Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Urol Ann ; 14(3): 232-235, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36117786

RESUMO

Aims: This study aimed to detect possible risk factors related to upstaging of clinical stage T2 organ-confined (OC) to non-OC (nOC) bladder cancer (BC) following radical cystectomy (RC). Settings and Design: This was a prospective multicenter study. Subjects and Methods: This is a multicenter prospective study including 196 Egyptian BC patients undergoing RC from January 2017 to February 2019 at Cairo University, Fayoum University, and Menoufia University. Only patients with muscle invasive BC (T2) were included in the study. Patients' characteristics, preoperative clinical data (including Hydronephrosis), cystoscopy data, and biopsy pathological data were recorded. Preoperative clinical staging is compared to postoperative pathological staging, to determine upstaged cases. The occurrence of upstaging in correspondence to each preoperative factor is recorded and statistically analyzed. Results: Among 196 BC patients of our study, upstaging from OC T2 to nOC occurred in 88 (44.9%) patients. Statistical analysis showed that the factors related to upstaging are older age (P ≤ 0.001), large tumor size (P = 0.048), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (P ≤ 0.001), and multifocal tumor (P ≤ 0.001). On the other hand, the following factors were not related to upstaging: gender (P = 0.159), smoking (P = 0.286), preoperative hydronephrosis (P = 0.242), and presence of carcinoma in situ (P = 0.349). Conclusions: The difference between clinical and pathological staging of BC patients following RC is a frequent problem with no clear guidelines to overcome it. Several factors including age of the patient, large tumor size, LVI, and multifocal tumor are predictors of upstaging in OC BC. A good concern must be taken in these patients to achieve an optimum treatment plan for them.

2.
Urol Ann ; 12(3): 271-275, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33100754

RESUMO

AIMS: The aim of the study was to investigate the relation between baseline prostate volume (PV) and the improvement of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) induced by tamsulosin monotherapy after 2-year follow-up in Egyptian benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a prospective comparative multicenter study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Three hundred and eighty-one BPH patients were included in the study from January 2014 to January 2017. The patients were divided according to their PV into two groups. Group A included patients with small-sized prostate (≤40 ml) and Group B included those with PV larger than 40 ml. Full evaluation was done at presentation. The patients are followed up at 6, 12, and 24 months of continued medical treatment with tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Data were coded and entered using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 24. Data were summarized using mean and standard deviation in quantitative data. Comparisons between quantitative variables were done using unpaired t-test or the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. A comparison between paired measurements in the same person was done using paired t-test (Chan, 2003). P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean age was 60.1 ± 7.2 years. The mean value of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was recorded for the 381 patients at presentation. In Group A, the mean value of IPSS was 20.44 ± 3.18, whereas in Group B, the mean value of IPSS was 21.23 ± 3.5. There was a significant improvement in symptoms (Qmax-IPSS) in both groups, but we found that this improvement was significantly better in Group A (P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: PV is an important prognostic factor affecting the improvement of the LUTS by α1-blocker monotherapy. Tamsulosin monotherapy may not be enough for large prostate (>40 mg) to maintain adequate symptom relief, and it is better to start with other medical options such as combined therapy or early nonmedical therapy. Starting α1-blocker monotherapy in smaller prostates may be of benefit in symptomatic patients without considering watchful waiting.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...