Remote ischemic conditioning in a rat model of testicular torsion: does it offer testicular protection?

BACKGROUND: Testicular torsion is a surgical emergency mainly affecting adolescent boys, with a relatively high rate of missed torsion and testicular loss secondary to delay in prompt diagnosis and surgical intervention. With ischemic reperfusion injury as its underlying culprit, testicular torsion may respond favorably to remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) where a non-privileged site (e.g. limb) is concurrently rendered ischemic to divert the cascade of reperfusion injury from the privileged organ (e.g. testicle), thus offering a protective effect in improving salvage. This mechanism is established for other organs, whereas it has not been evaluated for testis. AIM: It was aimed to evaluate RIC in a rat model of testicular torsion as a proof of principle that, similar to what has been demonstrated in other organs, RIC does offer testicular protection. STUDY DESIGN: This is an animal experimental study. Thirty Sprague-Dawley male rats were divided into control group (n = 15) and experimental group (n = 15). Non-survival surgeries of right-sided spermatic cord torsion (720° counter-clockwise twist) were performed for both the groups (45 min) followed by detorsion and reperfusion (5 min) and then orchiectomy. For the experiment group, an intervention of tail clamping to create RIC was applied 5 min after torsion, then unclamping 5 min before detorsion, followed by detorsion and reperfusion for 5 min and then orchiectomy. The testicles were histologically and immunologically examined using a hypoxia inducible factor (HIF-1α) ELISA Kit. The histological findings on ischemic changes, vascular congestion, and immunohistochemistry were quantified using previously described, validated grading systems. RESULTS: DISCUSSION: This is the first study to demonstrate the concept of RIC in an animal model of testicular torsion. It is limited by the non-availability of similar studies to compare outcomes and by the caution of extrapolating animal studies on humans. It does lay grounds, however, to subsequent studies to further elaborate on this concept and its clinical applicability. CONCLUSION: When RIC is applied in the experimental setting of testicular torsion, there is less evidence of hypoxic injury by histology and immunohistochemistry.

A controlled sequential evaluation of open donor nephrectomy versus classical and modified laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: an update.

This study sought to determine the procedure of choice for kidney retrieval for transplantation by comparing open donor nephrectomy to laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and modified laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and by analyzing intraoperative donor and recipient graft function parameters. In this single-center, controlled, sequential analysis, 100 consecutive donor-recipient pairs were recruited, grouped according to surgical procedure, and operated upon between 1997 to 2004, as follows: group 1, open donor nephrectomy (n = 30), performed from 1997 to 2000; group 2, laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (n = 28), performed from 2000 to 2002; and group 3, modified laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (n = 42), performed from 2002 to 2004. Data were analyzed by type of operative procedure, graft function, length of hospital stay, and donor recovery time. Operative time was similar for all three surgical approaches. Warm ischemia times for open donor nephrectomy and modified laparoscopic donor nephrectomy were similar. Acute tubular necrosis occurred in 7% of patients in all groups. Donor recovery and lengths of hospital stay were significantly shorter for laparoscopic approaches. Donor complications were similar in numbers, differing only in complication type. Graft function and survival were similar for all three surgical approaches. We conclude that modified laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is the procedure of choice for living kidney retrieval.

Observations on quadruple immunosuppression maintenance therapy using rapamycin, low-dose cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone following ATG induction.

INTRODUCTION: We prospectively evaluated an immunosuppressive regimen consisting of rapamycin (Rapa), low-dose cyclosporine (CsA), low-dose mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisone (group 1) versus a regimen of CsA, MMF, and prednisone (group 2) in mismatched living related donor (LRD) and living unrelated donor (LUD) kidney transplantation. METHODS: Group 1 included 24 transplant recipients of eight mismatched LRD and 16 LUD, treated with Rapa, low-dose MMF, CsA, and prednisone. Group 2 included 53 transplant recipients (25 LRD, 27 LUD, and one cadaveric donor), treated with MMF, CsA, and prednisone. All patients in group 1 received a single bolus of rabbit-anti-human T-lymphocyte immune serum (ATG-Fresenius 4 to 6 mg/kg). In group 2, patients received either a single ATG or an extended ATG course (3 to 5 days postoperatively). RESULTS: Acute rejection occurred in one patient in group 1 (4.2%) and in five patients (9.4%) in group 2, all of which resulted in graft loss. Serum creatinine was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The immunosuppressive protocol of Rapa, CsA, MMF, and prednisone with single-bolus induction ATG achieves excellent immunosuppression and graft survival with no apparent risks in the short and intermediate term.

A controlled sequential evaluation of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open donor nephrectomy: an update.

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we compared laparoscopic (lap Nx) to open donor nephrectomy (open Nx) with specific emphasis on outcomes in the donor and recipient. METHODS: This single-center sequential analysis recruited 100 consecutive donor-recipient pairs operated on from 1997 until 2003. The open Nx (n = 30), were performed between 1997 and 2000; the lap Nx (n = 70) were performed between 2000 and 2003. Prospective records included operative data, anatomic details of the graft, hospital stay, and donor recovery. RESULTS: Donor characteristics and renal function were similar for open Nx and lap Nx. Operative parameters were similar except for the longer warm ischemia time in lap Nx versus open Nx (3.14 +/- 2.10 vs 1.5 +/- 0.5 minute, P < .001). Donor complications were equivalent in number, but differed in spectrum with a trend toward more intraoperative complications with lap Nx versus more postoperative complications for open Nx. Donor recovery, hospital stay, and return to work were improved in lap Nx versus open Nx (P < .001). Renal function of grafts after lap Nx were similar to open Nx: 2-year serum creatinine values of 1.26 +/- 0.21 versus 1.31 +/- 0.40, respectively. Graft survivals were similar. CONCLUSION: Compared to open Nx lap Nx offers major advantages to the donor, and yields similarly favorable results in graft outcomes. However, it is more surgically demanding. Consequently, lap Nx should be adopted as the procedure of choice for living kidney retrieval.

Technical modifications of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: improved results with refinements in technique that mimic open nephrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: We have performed laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (lap Nx) since 2000. In June 2002, we modified the technique to minimize the known disadvantages of ATN and delayed graft function. We review our series of lap Nx before and after introduction of these modifications, respectively. METHODS: Four technical modifications of lap Nx were introduced following the initial previously described 28 cases (Group I) and applied to the consecutive 42 cases described herein (Group II): (1) decreasing the intra-abdominal pressure from 15 mm Hg to 8 mm Hg; (2) early dissection of the ureter and gonadal vein followed by vascular dissection (sharp and blunt using hydrodissection); (3) leaving the left gonadal vein in continuity with the left renal vein; and (4) early introduction of the Endocatch bag. RESULTS: Operative time was 276.6 +/- 67.1 min vs 210.0 +/- 38.0 min for groups I and II, respectively (P = .04). Warm ischemia was 4.9 +/- 1.9 min vs 1.5 +/- 0.9, min for groups I and II, respectively (P < .01). ATN occurred in 3/28 (10.7%) in group I vs 2/42 (4.8%) in-group II. There was one-vascular insult in the initial 5 Rt lap Nx, namely, transection of a segmental artery, that was reconstructed by bench repair without an impact on the outcome. Conversion was needed in 3/28 (10.7%) group I, but none of group II donors. CONCLUSION: The outcome of lap Nx can be significantly improved by applying technical modifications that simulate open Nx.