Assessment of physical properties of bioactive glass-modified universal multimode adhesive and its bonding potential to artificially induced caries affected dentin.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the physical properties of bioactive glass-modified universal multimode adhesive and its micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) to artificially induced caries-affected dentin. METHODS: All bond universal adhesive was used in the study. Specimens were divided into 2 main groups: control unmodified adhesive and 5 wt% BAG modified adhesive. The degree of conversion, pH, bioactivity, and viscosity of the adhesives were tested with n = 5 for each test. Micro-tensile bond strength evaluation was done in etch & rinse (ER) and selective-etch (SE) modes, where 24 human molar teeth were used (n = 3), 12 teeth for immediate bond strength, and the other 12 were tested after 6 months of storage in simulated body fluid (SBF). RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the control and the 5wt% BAG groups regarding the degree of conversion (61.01 ± 0.43 and 60.44 ± 0.61 respectively) and the viscosity (109.77 ± 22.3 and 124.3 ± 9.92 respectively). The control group revealed significantly lower pH values than the 5wt% BAG group (3.16 ± 0.5 and 4.26 ± 0.09 respectively). Immediate bond strength results revealed that the 5wt% BAG in the ER mode had the highest bond strength followed by the control group in the ER mode (44.16 ± 7.53 and 44.00 ± 7.96 respectively). SE groups showed that the immediate strength of the 5wt% BAG group was higher than the control group (42.09 ± 6.02 and 39.29 ± 6.64 respectively). After 6 months of storage, bond strength results revealed a decrease in bond strength values for the control groups but not for the 5wt% BAG in both application modes. CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of BAG (5wt%) improved the universal adhesive micro-tensile bond strength and bond durability for both adhesive application modes without affecting its degree of conversion or viscosity.

Change in surface properties of two different dental resin composites after using various beverages and brushing.

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to evaluate the influence of various beverages; with and without brushing; on the surface mechanical properties of two resin composites. METHODS: A total of 160 disc-shaped specimens were prepared for each of the following dental composites; nanohybrid ormocer (Admira fusion, VOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany) and nanohybrid resin composite (Grandio, VOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany). The baseline surface hardness and roughness measurements were carried out after 24 h. The composite samples were randomly distributed into one of the two groups; brushing and non-brushing, which were further divided into one of the four subgroups (n = 10); artificial saliva as control, coffee, red wine, and soft drink. In the non-brushing group, the specimens were immersed in the different beverages for five minutes three times daily for 30 days. The same procedure was done for the brushing group, in addition to brushing the specimens for five seconds. The surface hardness and roughness measurements were repeated after 30 days. One-way ANOVA and independent t-tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The soft drink had the most deteriorating effect and artificial saliva had the least. The change in surface properties was higher in the brushing subgroups. Grandio exhibited a higher change in surface microhardness while Admira fusion exhibited a higher change in surface roughness. CONCLUSIONS: The surface properties of both dental resin composites were negatively affected by using beverages and brushing.

Enamel Deproteinization: Will It Save The Shear Bond Strength For The Sake Of Preventing White Spot Lesions? / Desproteinização do esmalte: salvará a resistência ao cisalhamento para prevenir lesões de manchas brancas?

Objective: This study attempted to investigate the effect of enamel deproteinization using citric acid, PEG 400 and NaOCL on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to enamel using nano-silver modified resin for the prevention of white spot lesions. Material and Methods: 68 premolars were used in the study; nano-silver modified adhesive resin was used to bond orthodontic brackets to the enamel. Specimens were divided into 4 groups according to the applied surface treatment before bonding. Group I (control): acid etching with 37% phosphoric acid. Group II: deproteinization using 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) before acid etching. Group III:deproteinization using 10% citric acid before acid etching. Group IV:deproteinization using 5% polyethylene glycol (PEG 400) before acid etching. The specimens were then thermo- cycled for 6000 cycles. They were examined for surface roughness, shear bond strength and using electron microscope. Results: In both surface roughness and shear bond strength tests, Group III (citric acid) showed the highest values, followed by Group II (sodium hypochlorite); (p < 0.001). The least values were shown for Groups I (control) and IV (PEG 400), with no statistically significant difference between them (p = 0.948). SEM revealed etching pattern type 1 and 2 in the citric acid group while PEG 400 showed shallower micro- porosities. Conclusions: Deproteinization of enamel using either NaOCl or citric acid increased the bond strength of nano-sliver modified resin to enamel, with citric acid showing greater increase in bond strength. Deproteinization using PEG 400 did not increase the bond strength. (AU)

Objetivo: Este estudo buscou investigar o efeito da desproteinização do esmalte utilizando ácido cítrico, PEG 400 e NaOCl na resistência ao cisalhamento de braquetes ortodônticos ao esmalte usando resina modificada com nanoprata para a prevenção de lesões de manchas brancas. Material e Métodos: 68 pré-molares foram usados no estudo; resina adesiva modificada com nanoprata foi usada para colar os braquetes ortodônticos ao esmalte. Os corpos-de-prova foram divididos em 4 grupos de acordo com o tratamento de superfície aplicado antes da colagem. Grupo I (controle): condicionamento ácido com ácido fosfórico a 37%. Grupo II: desproteinização com hipoclorito de sódio a 5,25% (NaOCl) antes do condicionamento ácido. Grupo III: desproteinização com ácido cítrico a 10% antes do condicionamento ácido. Grupo IV: desproteinização com polietilenoglicol 5% (PEG 400) antes do condicionamento ácido. As amostras foram então termocicladas por 6.000 ciclos. Eles foram examinados quanto à rugosidade da superfície, resistência ao cisalhamento e usando microscópio eletrônico. Resultados: Nos testes de rugosidade superficial e resistência ao cisalhamento, o Grupo III (ácido cítrico) apresentou os maiores valores, seguido do Grupo II (hipoclorito de sódio); (p <0,001). Os menores valores foram apresentados para os Grupos I (controle) e IV (PEG 400), sem diferença estatisticamente significativa entre eles (p = 0,948). A microscopia eletrônica revelou padrão de ataque tipo 1 e 2 no grupo de ácido cítrico, enquanto PEG 400 mostrou microporosidades mais rasas. Conclusões: A desproteinização do esmalte com NaOCl ou ácido cítrico aumentou a força de união da resina modificada com nanoprata ao esmalte, com o ácido cítrico apresentando maior aumento na força de união. A desproteinização usando PEG 400 não aumentou a resistência de união. (AU)

Mechanical properties and bonding potential of partially stabilized zirconia treated with different chemomechanical treatments.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of different chemomechanical surface treatments of zirconia on fracture toughness, flexural strength, bond strength of zirconia to composite cement, surface topography, and phase transformation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pre-sintered yttrium-stabilized zirconium oxide blocks (in Coris ZI) were used. Specimens were prepared using a milling machine (Cerec InLab). Specimens for each testing procedure were classified into 6 groups according to the surface treatment applied: group 1: air-borne particle abrasion (ABA); group 2: silica coating; group 3: hot etching solution; group 4: hot etching solution followed by ABA; group V: hot etching solution followed by silica coating; group 6: control. Fracture toughness, biaxial flexural strength, and shear bond strength were tested using a universal testing machine. Surface topography was evaluated using a surface roughness tester and scanning electron microscope. Phase transformation was examined using x-ray diffraction analysis. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's HSD multiple comparisons test at p < 0.05. The strength reliability was analyzed using the Weibull distribution. RESULTS: Silica coating revealed the highest mean fracture toughness (9.18 ± 0.11 MPa • m½), biaxial flexural strength (1614.1 ± 124.6 MPa), and bond strength value (31.5 ± 5.06 MPa) among all tested groups. Surface topography evaluation revealed variations among the different surface-treated groups. CONCLUSIONS: Silica coating induced significant improvement in the tested properties compared to other treatments. The use of combined treatment of hot etching solution followed by either air-borne particle abrasion or silica coating of the zirconia surface did not provide an added advantage over silica coating alone.