The Third-Time Recurrence of a Thoracic Solitary Fibrous Tumor in a Patient Presenting With Paraneoplastic Hypoinsulinemic Hypoglycemia (Doege-Potter Syndrome).

We present a case of a 76-year-old Caucasian female with a recurrent solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) of the pleura, showcasing a rare manifestation of hypoglycemia associated with Doege-Potter syndrome (DPS). Having undergone two previous surgeries for SFT, the patient presented to the emergency department with severe fatigue, recurrent episodes of loss of consciousness, and hypoglycemia, despite lacking a history of diabetes mellitus. Radiological evaluation revealed a substantial recurrent SFT in the left lung, prompting excision through a left posterolateral thoracotomy. Remarkably, the patient's altered mental status and hypoglycemia resolved postoperatively. The case meets the criteria for aggressive SFT behavior, warranting consideration for adjuvant radiation therapy to control the risk of recurrence. This report highlights the nuanced interplay between SFT recurrence, paraneoplastic syndromes like DPS, and the potential benefits of adjuvant therapeutic strategies in managing these complex clinical scenarios.

Unilateral Versus Bilateral Cages in Lumbar Interbody Fusions: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral cages are often used for interbody fusion. However, this procedure may not be possible in some cases making unilateral cages a reasonable alternative. The literature remains divided on the clinical and radiological distinctions when comparing unilateral to bilateral cages in lumbar interbody fusion. Thus, this meta-analysis will analyze the clinical and radiographic outcomes between these 2 groups. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (page 1-20) were searched till January 2024. The clinical outcomes evaluated were the incidence of adverse events, surgery-related parameters, and patient reported outcomes. RESULTS: Lower rates of pseudoarthrosis, subsidence, were reported in the bilateral cages group (P = 0.01, P = 0.001, respectively) whereas shorter operative time (OR time), and lower estimated blood loss were seen in unilateral cage group (P < 0.001, and P = 0.003). There was no statistically significant difference in the remaining analyzed outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral cages were shown to be superior due to their reduced OR time and estimated blood loss. As for the higher rate of pseudoarthrosis, this outcome may not be related to the cage numbers and it did not affect clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, one must consider other factors such as radiographic sagittal parameters before making a surgical decision.

Will ChatGPT be Able to Replace a Spine Surgeon in the Clinical Setting?

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates ChatGPT's performance in diagnosing and managing spinal pathologies. METHODS: Patients underwent evaluation by two spine surgeons (and the case was discussed and a consensus was reached) and ChatGPT. Patient data, including demographics, symptoms, and available imaging reports, were collected using a standardized form. This information was then processed by ChatGPT for diagnosis and management recommendations. The study assessed ChatGPT's diagnostic and management accuracy through descriptive statistics, comparing its performance to that of experienced spine specialists. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients with various spinal pathologies participated in the study, with a gender distribution of 40 males and 57 females. ChatGPT achieved a 70% diagnostic accuracy rate and provided suitable management recommendations for 95% of patients. However, it struggled with certain pathologies, misdiagnosing 100% of vertebral trauma and facet joint syndrome, 40% of spondylolisthesis, stenosis, and scoliosis, and 22% of disc-related pathologies. Furthermore, ChatGPT's management recommendations were poor in 53% of cases, often failing to suggest the most appropriate treatment options and occasionally providing incomplete advice. CONCLUSIONS: While helpful in the medical field, ChatGPT falls short in providing reliable management recommendations, with a 30% misdiagnosis rate and 53% mismanagement rate in our study. Its limitations, including reliance on outdated data and the inability to interactively gather patient information, must be acknowledged. Surgeons should use ChatGPT cautiously as a supplementary tool rather than a substitute for their clinical expertise, as the complexities of healthcare demand human judgment and interaction.