Effect of caring leadership intervention program for first-line nurse managers on their managerial actions and nurse outcomes.

AIM: The aim of the study was to examine the effect of a caring leadership intervention program for first-line nurse managers (FLNM) on their caring knowledge and managerial actions as well as nurses' perceived FLNM caring behaviours and nurse outcomes. DESIGN: A quasi-experimental study design was implemented on two groups; study and control, including 30 FLNM and 150 nurses for each. METHODS: Self-report questionnaires about FLNMs' knowledge of caring behaviours and their managerial actions, nurses perceived line nurse managers' caring behaviours and nurses' outcomes (job satisfaction and work engagement) were utilized to collect study data from 1 July 2022 to 30 December 2022. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference and changes were revealed between the study and control groups in FLNMs' caring knowledge and their managerial actions, and nurses' perceived FLNMs' caring behaviours, nurses' job satisfaction and nurses' work engagement during post-test in comparison to pre-test. Higher total mean scores of post-test in the study group were recorded compared to those of control group regarding FLNMs' caring knowledge and their managerial actions as well as nurses 'perceived FLNMs' caring behaviour, job satisfaction and work engagement. CONCLUSION: The caring leadership intervention program for FLNMs was highly effective in enhancing their caring knowledge and managerial actions as well as nurses' perceived FLNM caring behaviours and nurse outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: Caring leadership can help FLNMs to create a healthy environment, resulting in a positive outcome for nurse staff, patients and healthcare organizations. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient and public contribution.

Nursing workplace and its relation to occupational health outcomes and physical activity.

Background: Working in hospitals entails several risks to nurses. A better nursing workplace can help in improving physical activity and reducing adverse occupational health outcomes among nurses. Aim: This study aimed to investigate the relationships of the nursing workplace with occupational health outcomes and physical activity. Methods: A cross-sectional correlation study was conducted with 623 nurses. Data were collected through report self-administered questionnaires that included employment and occupational conditions, hospital workplace environment, and adverse occupational health outcomes as well as physical activity pattern. Results: The current study showed that the nursing workplace environment and conditions had a negative effect on occupational health outcomes and physical activity among nurses in the study units. Nurses in this study reported a high prevalence of low back pain (82.7%), burnout (78.3%), and occupational injuries (70.5%). They also reported insufficient physical activities (90.6%). High prevalence of burnout and low back pain were associated with low levels of physical activities among nurses. Conclusion: A fair working environment and conditions have been implicated as a causative factor of negative occupational health outcomes and limitations of physical activity among nurses. Adverse occupational health outcomes also affect the nurses engaging in physical activity.

A Newly Developed Egyptian Tool for Evaluating Rationing of Nursing Care: Relation to Organization Attributes and Patient Outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This work developed an Egyptian tool for evaluating rationing of nursing care in critical units and investigated its association with nursing organization attributes and six nurse-sensitive patient outcomes. METHODS: Rationing of the nursing care questionnaire and concurrent record review were conducted to collect data. RESULTS: Developed Egyptian tool of rationing of nursing care contained 36 items in six components. Adverse patient outcomes were detected as medication administration errors (27.9%), pulmonary infection (24.5%), pressure ulcer (20.3%), bloodstream infections (12.6%), urinary tract infections (10.3%), and patient falls (4.7%). The mild level of rationing of nursing care was positively associated with negative patient outcomes and negatively correlated with fair nursing organization attributes. CONCLUSION: The valid and reliable Egyptian tool for evaluating the rationing of nursing care was developed.

Using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Blood Administration Process in Surgical Care Units: New Categories of Errors.

BACKGROUND: Blood administration failures and errors have been a crucial issue in health care settings. Failure mode and effects analysis is an effective tool for the analysis of failures and errors in such lifesaving procedures. These failures or errors would lead to adverse outcomes for patients during blood administration. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to: use health care failure mode and effect analysis (HFMEA) for assessing potential failure modes associated with blood administration processes among nurses; develop a categorization of blood administration errors; and identify underlying reasons, proactive measures for identified failure modes, and corrective actions for identified high-risk failures. METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in surgical care units by using observation, HFMEA, and brainstorming techniques. Prioritization of detected potential failures was performed by Pareto analysis. RESULTS: Eleven practical steps and 38 potential failure modes associated with 11 categories of errors were detected in this process. These categories of errors were newly developed in this study. In total, 17 of 38 potential failures were detected as high-risk failures that occurred during the sample-drawing, checking, preparing, administering, and monitoring steps. For cause analysis of failures and errors, proactive suggested actions were undertaken for 38 potential failure modes, and corrective actions for 17 high-risk failures. CONCLUSION: HFMEA is an efficient and well-organized tool for identification of and reduction in high-risk failures and errors in the blood administration process among nurses without building punitive culture. This tool also helps pay attention to redesigning and standardizing the blood administration process as well as providing training and educational programs for providing knowledge.