RESUMO
Electrooculography (EOG) is a method to concurrently obtain electrophysiological signals accompanying an Electroencephalography (EEG), where both methods have a common cerebral pattern and imply a similar medical significance. The most common electrophysiological signal source is EOG that contaminated the EEG signal and thereby decreases the accuracy of measurement and the predicated signal strength. In this study, we introduce a method to improve the correction efficiency for EOG artifacts (EOAs) on raw EEG recordings: We retrieve cerebral information from three EEG signals with high system performance and accuracy by applying feature engineering and a novel machine-learning (ML) procedure. To this end, we use two adaptive algorithms for signal decomposition to remove EOAs from multichannel EEG signals: empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition (CEEMD), both using the Hilbert-Huang transform. First, the signal components are decomposed into multiple intrinsic mode functions. Next, statistical feature extraction and dimension reduction using principal component analysis are employed to select optimal feature sets for the ML procedure that is based on classification and regression models. The proposed CEEMD algorithm enhances the accuracy compared to the EMD algorithm and considerably improves the multi-sensory classification of EEG signals. Models of three different categories are applied, and the classification is based on a K-nearest neighbor (k-NN) algorithm, a decision tree (DT) algorithm, and a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm with accuracies of 94% for K-NN, 75% for DT, and 69% for SVM. For each classification model, a regression learner is used to assist as an evidence rule for the proposed artificial system and to influence the learning process from classification and regression models. The regression learning algorithms applied include algorithms based on an ensemble of trees (ET), a DT, and a SVM. We find that the ET-based regression model exhibits a determination coefficient R2 = 1.00 outperforming the other two approaches with R2 = 0.80 for DT and R2 = 0.76 for SVM.
