Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 46(3): 373-6, 2003 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12626914

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Our aim was to determine whether the mucosa of a canine jejunal pouch used as a rectal substitute after proctocolectomy retains its morphologic features better than the mucosa of a canine ileal pouch so used. METHODS: Among ten dogs that underwent proctocolectomy, five had a jejunal pouch-distal rectal anastomosis and five an ileal pouch-distal rectal anastomosis. After six months, the animals were killed, the intestinal pouches and portions of unaltered distal ileum were removed, and a blinded, mucosal morphometric analysis was performed. RESULTS: The mucosa of the jejunal pouches had an overall thickness (mean +/- standard deviation, anterior and posterior walls, 1,300 +/- 140 microm), villous height (286 +/- 46 microm), and crypt depth (790 +/- 77 microm) greater than that of the ileal pouches (920 +/- 170, 208 +/- 47, and 530 +/- 130 microm, respectively; P < 0.05). Moreover, the mucosal thickness of the jejunal pouches was similar to that of the distal ileum proximal to the pouch (1,200 +/- 200 microm; P > 0.05), whereas the mucosal thickness of the ileal pouch was thinner (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The jejunal mucosa retains its major morphometric features when the jejunum is used as a rectal substitute after proctocolectomy. In contrast, the ileal mucosa atrophies when the ileum is so used.


Assuntos
Bolsas Cólicas/patologia , Mucosa Intestinal/patologia , Proctocolectomia Restauradora/métodos , Animais , Cães , Feminino , Modelos Animais
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...