A systematic review on outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials on surgical interventions for female stress urinary incontinence: a call to develop a core outcome set.

BACKGROUND: Several meta-analyses have identified methodological limitations in female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) trials, precluding the synthesis of primary studies and high-quality evidence. OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of outcome measure selection and outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on surgery for SUI. SEARCH STRATEGY: Systematic review of RCTs identified from bibliographical databases, including Medline, Cochrane, and EMBASE. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of surgical interventions for the management of female SUI. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two researchers independently assessed the included studies and documented outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: Overall, 108 studies were identified that included 422 reported outcomes and 119 outcome measures. The three most common outcomes were cure rates (87 studies), quality of life (85 studies), and overactive bladder (78 studies). The median methodological quality rating was 3 (range 0-3) and the outcome reporting quality rating was 3 (range 0-5). Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that the methodological quality and use of validated questionnaire were significant predictors of the quality of outcome reporting (ß = 0.538, P < 0.001; ß = 0.218, P = 0.011, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Outcome reporting in SUI trials is highly variable. Until a core outcome set is developed and implemented, we propose an interim use of three commonly reported outcomes in each domain (treatment success rate - complete cure, partial improvement, or failure of response; urodynamic evaluation outcomes - overactive bladder (OAB), voiding dysfunction, and urodynamic stress incontinence; patient-reported outcomes - quality of life, sexual dysfunction, and patient satisfaction) with the use of validated questionnaires for patient-reported outcomes and subjective success rates. Complications should be also explicitly and comprehensively reported using validated outcome measures. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: There is significant variation in outcome reporting in SUI trials. Our systematic review findings aim to form the basis for the development of a core outcome set.

Do we need a core outcome set for childbirth perineal trauma research? A systematic review of outcome reporting in randomised trials evaluating the management of childbirth trauma.

BACKGROUND: Selecting appropriate outcomes to reflect both beneficial and harmful effects is a critical step in designing childbirth trauma trials. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes and outcome measures reported in randomised controlled trials evaluating interventions for childbirth trauma. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised trials were identified by searching bibliographical databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and EMBASE. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of different techniques in the management of perineal lacerations. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two researchers independently assessed studies for inclusion, evaluated methodological quality, and extracted the relevant data. Spearman's ρ correlation and multivariate linear regression analysis using the backward stepwise model were used for analysis. MAIN RESULTS: Forty-eight randomised trials, reporting data from 20 308 women, were included. Seventeen different interventions were evaluated. Included trials reported 77 different outcomes and 50 different outcome measures. Commonly reported outcomes included pain (34 trials; 70%), wound healing (20 trials; 42%), and anorectal dysfunction (16 trials, 33%). In the multivariate analysis, no relationship was demonstrated between the quality of outcome reporting and year of publication (P = 0.31), journal impact factor (P = 0.49), and methodological quality (P = 0.13). CONCLUSION: Outcome reporting in childbirth trauma research is heterogeneous. Developing, disseminating, and implementing a core outcome set in future childbirth trauma research could help address these issues. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Developing @coreoutcomes for childbirth trauma research could help to reduce #research waste.

Health education in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya: assessment of future needs.

The aim of this study was to determine priority health issues, target groups and education media for future health education programmes in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. A questionnaire was addressed to 2 groups: health officials (n=60) and the general public (n=300). In their lists of health issues to focus on, 7 were the same although prioritization differed. Children and youth were considered the most important target groups and the school setting the most appropriate medium for them. Broadcast media were acknowledged as valuable for health education for the general public. We recommend systematic consultation across official and lay groups as a preliminary requisite for health education initiatives.

Role of health education programmes within the Libyan community.

The effectiveness of existing Libyan health education programmes was evaluated in order to assess how the service may be improved. A representative sample of the general public completed a questionnaire on health knowledge, healthy behaviours and the impact of various health education media. The 872 participants ranked health education media by effectiveness, with television ranked highest and booklets and leaflets lowest. We recommend reorganization of the use of different health education media in future planning.

Role of health education programmes within the Libyan community

The effectiveness of existing Libyan health education programmes was evaluated in order to assess how the service may be improved. A representative sample of the general public completed a questionnaire on health knowledge, healthy behaviours and the impact of various health education media. The 872 participants ranked health education media by effectiveness, with television ranked highest and booklets and leaflets lowest. We recommend reorganization of the use of different health education media in future planning