Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
3.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 34(2): 271-276, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31004273

RESUMO

Major hemodynamic changes are frequently noted during liver transplantation (LT). We evaluated the performance of electrical velocimetry (EV) as compared to that of TEE in SV optimization during liver transplantation. This was an observational study in 32 patients undergoing LT. We compared SV values measured simultaneously by EV (SVEV) and TEE (SVTEE) at baseline 30 min after induction, at the end of dissection phase, 30 min after anhepatic phase, 30 min after reperfusion. We also evaluated the reliability of EV to track changes In SV before and after 49 fluid challenges. Finally, the SV variation (SVV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) were tested as predictors for volume responsiveness, defined as an increase in SV ≥ 10% after 250 ml of colloid. For 112 paired SV data, the overall correlation was 0.76 and bias (limits of agreement) 0.3 (- 29 to 29) ml percentage error 62%. The EV was able to track changes in SV with a concordance rate of 97%, and a sensitivity and specificity of 93% to detect a positive fluid challenge. The AUC values (with 95% confidence intervals) for SVV and PPV were 0.68 (0.52-0.83) and 0.72 (0.57-0.86), respectively, indicating low predictive capacity in these setting. The absolute values of SV derived from EV did not agree with SV derived from TEE. However, EV was able to track the direction of changes in SV during hemodynamic management of patients undergoing liver transplantation.Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03228329 prospectively Registered on 13-July-2017.


Assuntos
Monitorização Hemodinâmica/métodos , Transplante de Fígado , Monitorização Intraoperatória/métodos , Ressuscitação , Reologia/métodos , Adulto , Cardiografia de Impedância/métodos , Cardiografia de Impedância/estatística & dados numéricos , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Feminino , Hidratação , Monitorização Hemodinâmica/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monitorização Intraoperatória/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Reologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Volume Sistólico
4.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 19(1): 56, 2019 04 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30987597

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mini-fluid challenge is a well tested and effective tool to predict fluid responsiveness under various clinical conditions. However, mini-fluid challenge has never been tested in patients with end-stage liver disease. This study investigated whether infusion of 150 ml albumin 5% can predict fluid responsiveness in cirrhotic patients following liver transplant. METHODS: Fifty patients receiving living donor liver transplant were included in the analysis. Mini-fluid challenge composed of 150 ml of albumin 5% administered over 1 min in three consecutive 50-ml fluid boluses. An additional 350 ml was then infused at a constant rate over 15 min (for a total of 500 ml). Stroke volume (SV) was measured as the product of the subaortic velocity time integral (VTI) and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) area. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in SV by ≥15% after the infusion. RESULTS: Fifty patients were enrolled in the study. Fourteen patients were classified with Child A, 15 patients with Child B, and 21 patients with Child C cirrhosis. Thirty four patients were fluid responders and 16 patients were fluid non-responders. After 150 ml of albumin 5%, the SV increased significantly in our cohort. The area under receiver operating curve (AUROC) was 0.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5-0.8, P = 0.005). In subgroup analysis, the SV increased significantly after mini fluid challenge in the Child A group (P = 0.017) but not Child B or C groups (P = 0.3 and 0.29, respectively). The AUROC for mini-fluid challenge in the Child A group was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6-0.9, P = 0.0004), while mini-fluid challenge failed to discriminate between responders and non-responders in Child B and C groups. CONCLUSION: A mini-fluid challenge of 150 ml albumin 5% can predict fluid responsiveness in liver transplant patients with fair sensitivity and specifiicty. Subgroup analyis revealed that minifluid challenge can predict fluid responsiveness in patients with Child A cirrhosis but not patients with Child B or C cirrhosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03396159 . (Prospective registered). Initial registration date was 10/01/2018.


Assuntos
Doença Hepática Terminal/cirurgia , Hidratação/métodos , Hidratação/normas , Transplante de Fígado/normas , Albumina Sérica Humana/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Doença Hepática Terminal/diagnóstico , Doença Hepática Terminal/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Hemodinâmica/fisiologia , Humanos , Transplante de Fígado/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...