Association between characteristics of previous cesarean delivery and pelvic adhesions: a case-controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the correlation of previous cesarean delivery characteristics to pelvic adhesions in infertile patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This Case-controlled study was conducted in the period from January 2018 to December 2020 at Tanta University. All patients (222) presenting with post-cesarean infertility who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy were included in the study. According to presence of adhesions during laparoscopy, two groups were allocated. Characteristics of previous cesarean delivery were assessed in patients with or without adhesions. RESULTS: There were significant differences between both groups regarding type of CS, shape of skin scar, parietal peritoneal closure, and postoperative complications of the prior CS between both groups. Independent predictors of adhesions were age [OR: 1.43 (1.15-1.77); p = 0.001], BMI [OR: 0.76 (0.61-0.95); p = 0.02], emergency CS [OR: 7.74 (1.61-37.19); p = 0.01], parietal peritoneal closure [OR: 0.06 (0.01-0.24); p = 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Post-cesarean adhesions were correlated to age, BMI, emergency CD, double layer closure, and closure of peritoneum and to postoperative complications. No correlation to duration of infertility or number of cesarean sections.

Outcomes of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Infertile Men with Nontense Vaginal Hydrocele: A Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of nontense vaginal hydrocele in male partner with oligoasthenospermia on the success rates of the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Enrolled patients (n = 60) were divided into two groups: Group I who have oligoasthenospermia with nontense vaginal hydrocele (study group) and Group II who have oligoasthenospermia with no hydrocele group (control group). The primary outcomes included the fertilization and pregnancy rates whereas the secondary outcomes included any complications occurred. RESULTS: There were no differences in demographic characteristics between both groups. Semen parameters were poorer in the hydrocele group than in the nonhydrocele group regarding count and motility (P < 0.001). The volume of testis was reduced significantly in the hydrocele group (P < 0.001). The results of ICSI regarding fertilization rate, number and quality of developed embryos, and pregnancy rates are not statistically different between both groups. CONCLUSION: Hydrocele affects both sperm count and motility, but it has no effects on ICSI outcomes. Clinical pregnancy rate was comparable in patients with or without hydrocele. Hence, the surgical management of hydrocele before ICSI is not recommended.