Use of computer-assisted rescreening as an ancillary tool to subclassify AGUS cervical smears.

A substantial percentage of women with a diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) on cervical smears harbor a significant squamous or glandular, preneoplastic or neoplastic lesion on subsequent follow-up. Attempts to subclassify AGUS smears by conventional methods have had mixed results. To determine whether subclassification of AGUS cervical smears using computer-assisted rescreening based on the neural network would improve correlation with subsequent histologic follow-up, 91 cervical smears, conventionally diagnosed as AGUS without concomitant squamous lesions, were subjected to analysis by a computer-assisted automated screening system. Computer-generated images were evaluated by a cytotechnologist without the knowledge of the histologic outcomes. Prior to manual review, each case was classified as either within normal limits, no review required; or abnormal, review required. Based on the degree of abnormality, the latter category was further subclassified into either low probability or high probability of abnormality. The results of the computer-assisted reclassification were then compared with the histologic follow-up of all patients. Thirty-three cases (38.8%) had a significant lesion on histologic follow-up. The lesions included 4 CIN I, 7 CIN II/III, 12 endocervical adenocarcinomas (ACA), and 10 endometrial ACA. Based on computer-generated images, 65% of the smears that were triaged as high probability of abnormality, 11.5% that were triaged as low probability of abnormality, and 10.5% that were triaged as within normal limits had a significant lesion on subsequent follow-up. We conclude that computer-assisted rescreening aids in the triage of AGUS smears and that computer-assisted rescreening based on the neural network or other algorithms may be a useful ancillary tool for subclassifying AGUS cervical smears.

Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. A follow-up study from an academic medical center.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) and the incidence of subsequent clinically significant lesions. STUDY DESIGN: A computer-based search of our cytology laboratory files was performed for cervicovaginal smears diagnosed as AGUS from January 1996 to December 1996. RESULTS: In 43,456 cervicovaginal smears examined during the 12-month period, AGUS was reported in 222 (0.5%) cases, with follow-up in 191 (86.0%) (133 [59.9%] biopsies and 58 [26.1%] repeat cervicovaginal smears). Among the patients with repeat cervicovaginal smears, 1 (1.7%) had a high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, and 10 (17.2%) had persistent AGUS/atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; the remainder were within normal limits. Thirty-three (24.8%) patients had preneoplastic or neoplastic, squamous or glandular lesions on biopsy (8 [6.0%] cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] 1, 18 [13.5%] CIN 2/3 and 7 [5.3%] endometrial adenocarcinomas). Half the patients with CIN 2/3 also had evidence of endocervical gland involvement. Squamous lesions were seen more commonly in premenopausal women, while glandular lesions were noted predominantly in postmenopausal women. Patients with a prior abnormal gynecologic history or a concomitant diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) had a higher incidence of significant lesions on subsequent biopsy. CONCLUSION: Our incidence of AGUS was 0.5%, similar to that in other published reports. AGUS is associated with a significant number of squamous or glandular, premalignant or malignant lesions. A majority of these lesions are high grade SIL, often with endocervical gland involvement. A small but significant number of patients had a glandular malignancy. Our results justify close and persistent follow-up for patients with a diagnosis of AGUS on cervicovaginal smears.

Cytology of polypoid adenomyomas: a report of two cases.

Uterine polypoid adenomyomas, both typical and atypical variants, often arise in the lower uterine segment or endocervical canal as pedunculated polypoid masses that may be accessible for cytologic sampling. However, their cytologic findings have rarely been described in the literature. Two women in their reproductive age presented with abnormal vaginal bleeding. The cervicovaginal smear of the first patient contained sheets and strips of reactive endocervical cells in an inflammatory background. In addition, loose aggregates of spindle-shaped smooth muscle cells were also noted. The findings were consistent with those of a typical polypoid adenomyoma. The cervicovaginal smears of the second patient consisted of tightly packed, crowded clusters of glandular cells which were initially interpreted as atypical glandular cells, suspicious of adenocarcinoma. In retrospect, loose aggregates of smooth muscle stromal cells were noted. Subsequent curettage revealed an atypical polypoid adenomyoma. The cytologic findings of typical polypoid adenomyoma were nonspecific except for the presence of loose aggregates of smooth muscle cells. The cytologic features of an atypical polypoid adenomyoma may mimic that of a neoplastic glandular process. The findings of tightly packed clusters of glandular cells and loose aggregate of bland-appearing smooth muscle cells in premenopausal patients may suggest the diagnosis of atypical polypoid adenomyoma. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2000;22:176-180.