Lateralized readiness potentials can identify hemisphere of recovery in stroke patients.

BACKGROUND: Event related cortical potentials related to motor action are referred to as movement related cortical potentials. The late component of which is the readiness potential (RP) and its polarity is more negative in the hemisphere responsible for planning of motor action. This lateralized nature of RP during unilateral hand movement is studied as lateralized readiness potential (LRP) by calculating the contralateral-minus-ipsilateral difference wave for each hand. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to identify the hemisphere contributing to motor recovery in acute and chronic stroke patients through recording LRPs. METHODS: Twenty-nine cases with cerebrovascular stroke (15 acute and 14 chronic) were included in the study. EEG was recorded in response to self-cued button presses by the paretic side to obtain the averaged LRP amplitude. The hemisphere with greater negativity was considered the side of recovery. Functional recovery was assessed by Fugl Meyer test. RESULTS: In acute cases, recovery was more related to LRP activity in the contralesional hemisphere (73%), whereas lateralization was equal in chronic cases; 50% in either group. LRP amplitude was higher in the contralesional hemisphere (p = 0.02). Functional recovery assessed by the Fugl Meyer test (FM) was similar whether recovery was ipsi- or contralesional. CONCLUSIONS: Early after stroke, motor recovery is more likely to involve compensatory activity in the contralesional hemisphere, while in the chronic phase, the ipsilesional hemisphere may recover its function and become more active. Further research is needed to verify if the technique mentioned in our study could be used to guide customized NIBS protocols tailoring the optimal site and parameters for each patient.

Development of an Arabic version of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire as a tool to study eye diseases patients in Egypt.

AIM: To develop and test an Arabic version of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25). METHODS: NEI-VFQ-25 was translated into Arabic according to WHO translation guidelines. We enrolled adult consenting patients with bilateral chronic eye diseases who presented to 14 hospitals across Egypt from October to December 2012, and documented their clinical findings. Psychometric properties were then tested using STATA. RESULTS: We recruited 379 patients, whose mean age was (54.5±15)y. Of 46.2% were males, 227 had cataract, 31 had glaucoma, 23 had retinal detachment, 37 had diabetic retinopathy, and 61 had miscellaneous visual defects. Non-response rate and the floor and ceiling numbers of the Arabic version (ARB-VFQ-25) were calculated. Internal consistency was high in all subscales (except general health), with Cronbach-α ranging from 0.702-0.911. Test-retest reliability was high (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.79). CONCLUSION: ARB-VFQ-25 is a reliable and valid tool for assessing visual functions of Arabic speaking patients. However, some questions had high non-response rates and should be substituted by available alternatives. Our results support the importance of including self-reported visual functions as part of routine ophthalmologic examination.