RESUMO
Aim: Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common female cancer worldwide. Nevertheless, there is no available universal screening method for malignant ovarian masses. This study compares the value of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) and Pelvic Mass Score (PMS) scoring systems in the diagnosis of malignant ovarian masses. Material and methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted from March 2021 until April 2022. A total of 258 women diagnosed with ovarian mass and eligible for surgical intervention according to institutional guidelines were enrolled in the study. Ultrasound was performed for the assessment of masses, ascites and metastases, also color flow Doppler was done to measure the resistance index of the mass vasculature. Preoperative venous blood samples were collected to measure CA 125 and HE4. PMS and ROMA scoring systems were calculated for each patient. All women were subjected to a surgical intervention (according to applicable institutional guidelines), using either open or laparoscopic techniques. Histopathological examination of the removed specimens was done, and in line with the recognized gold standard, the results were compared with the pre-operative diagnosis of both scoring systems. Results: Both PMS and ROMA showed a high predictive probability for ovarian malignancies (AUC = 0.93, sensitivity = 83.3%, specificity = 90.37%; AUC = 0.91, sensitivity = 84.4%, specificity = 95.56%, respectively), yet no statistical significant difference was found between the two scoring systems (p = 0.353, 95% CI -0.025 to 0.070). Conclusions: Both PMS and ROMA seem to be promising scoring systems for discriminating benign from malignant ovarian masses, but more research is needed to determine the optimum diagnostic pathway, especially one yielding the least false-negative results.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of micronised flavonoids versus tranexamic acid in reducing menstrual blood loss (MBL) associated with the use of the TCu 380A intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) in women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). METHODS: We conducted a randomised double-blind clinical trial between October 2016 and August 2017 in 100 women with HMB (defined as a pictorial blood assessment chart [PBAC] score >100) secondary to IUD use. After assessment of MBL using PBAC score in a baseline cycle, participants were randomised to receive either oral tranexamic acid 500 mg or oral micronised flavonoids 500 mg every 6 h for the first three days of menstruation. PBAC scores were collected in the three subsequent treatment cycles. The primary outcome was the difference in PBAC scores between the groups. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess the primary outcome of the change in PBAC scores. RESULTS: Mean PBAC scores were significantly improved in the tranexamic acid group compared with the micronised flavonoids group (236 ± 48, 105 ± 26, 97 ± 16 and 93 ± 15 at the baseline, first, second and third study cycle, respectively, versus 227 ± 52, 139 ± 29, 128 ± 25 and 125 ± 24 in the micronised flavonoids group; p = .01). Moreover, the number of bleeding days and number of pads used were significantly reduced in the tranexamic acid group compared with the micronised flavonoids group (p = .009 and p = .03, respectively). Side effects were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Oral tranexamic acid compared with oral micronised flavonoids is more effective in reducing HMB associated with copper IUD use. Treating IUD-induced HMB using tranexamic acid was more effective compared with micronised flavonoids in decreasing MBL volume and the number of bleeding days.
