Functional and patient-reported outcomes of the Swanson metacarpo-phalangeal arthroplasty in the rheumatoid hand.

INTRODUCTION: Replacement of the metacarpo-phalangeal joints (MCPJ) with silastic Swanson's implants can help decrease pain, stiffness and allow for improved function in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There is a lack of patient reported outcome measure (PROM) studies assessing the efficacy of this procedure in RA. The aim of this study was to report any change in function, pain, stiffness and satisfaction following the Swanson MCPJ replacement using patient reported outcomes in a rheumatoid population. METHODS: The combined results of 64 RA patients (71 hands) with 284 Swanson MCPJ arthroplasties (mean follow-up: 75.85 months) were assessed using the validated M-SACRAH questionnaire and a separate satisfaction questionnaire. Radiographic evaluation was performed to insure correct alignment of the hinged prosthesis postoperatively. No attempt was made to identify other predictors, radiologically or clinically. Data analysed in the study was interpreted in the context of the number of hands and survivorship was defined as implant fracture, loosening or revision. RESULTS: The mean total functional outcome score improved by 46.2% and the total pain outcome improved by 60.2%. The total stiffness outcome improved by 56.9% postoperatively and the results obtained from the satisfaction questions revealed that 73.2% of patients would retrospectively elect to have the procedure again. We report two postoperative complications in this group of superficial wound infections. Radiographically, all MCPJs showed improved alignment, however five patients reported worsening pain, four patients reported increased stiffness and four reported reduced function postoperatively. There was one re-operation of a 5th MCPJ Swanson's, which did not require implant exchange and one implant was revised. Implant survivorship was 98.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Patient satisfaction and functional surrogate markers were overall favourable. Our results support the continued use of Swanson silastic arthoplasty in advanced RA.

Patient rated outcomes study into the surgical interventions available for the rheumatoid hand and wrist.

INTRODUCTION: A multitude of surgical interventions are recognised for the treatment of the rheumatoid hand and wrist, however there seems to be a distinct lack of patient rated outcome measures (PROMs) studies reporting on the efficacy of these procedures. The aim of this study was to assess the PROMs related to hand and wrist surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single surgeon series identified 94 patients (133 hands) with RA who had undergone one of eight surgical procedures (Swanson's arthroplasty, finger joint or wrist arthrodesis, carpal tunnel decompression, posterior interosseous nerve denervation, RA nodule excision, synovectomy/tenosynovectomy and tendon repair/release) with a mean follow-up period of 3 years. The primary outcome measures were the same for all patients and comprised the validated modified score for the assessment and quantification of chronic rheumatoid affections of the hand (M-SACRAH) and a separate satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: Highly significant improvements in both function and pain scores are reported across the cohort as a whole following hand surgery, with this pattern replicated within all of the operative subgroups. In keeping with these favourable results very high levels of overall satisfaction were reported with 93 % of patients reporting themselves to be very or fairly satisfied with their procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patient reported outcomes in functional, stiffness and pain domains of the M-SACRAH questionnaire appear very favourable across the range of surgical procedures that can be performed in the rheumatoid hand. We believe this data supports the use of all the procedures explored, and will be helpful in patient guidance.

Functional and patient-reported outcome of partial wrist denervation versus the Mannerfelt wrist arthrodesis in the rheumatoid wrist.

INTRODUCTION: Wrist arthrodesis offers high success rates in patients with rheumatoid arthritis; however, loss of residual mobility may cause unnecessary disability. This makes wrist denervation an appealing alternative. However, there is a distinct lack of patient-reported outcome measure studies comparing these two procedures. The aim of this study was to report any change in function, pain and satisfaction following wrist arthrodesis compared to denervation in a single surgeon series of rheumatoid patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The results of 16 wrist arthrodesis in 15 patients and 14 partial (PIN) wrist denervations in 13 patients were compared with a mean follow-up period of 39 and 22 months, respectively. The primary outcome measures were the same for both groups and included the validated patient-rated wrist evaluation questionnaire and a satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: Wrist arthrodesis significantly improved the mean total pain and functional outcome scores by 54 and 36 %, respectively, at the time of follow-up. Wrist denervation patients also reported significant improvements of 44 and 42 % in total pain and functional outcomes, respectively; 87 % reported being very satisfied with their wrist arthrodesis procedure compared to 78 % in the denervation group. No statistically significant difference in response between the groups was observed in this series of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Both procedures enjoyed favourable results amongst patients with excellent satisfaction outcomes. PIN denervation is a simple procedure with low complication rates and we therefore consider it a valid alternative to more difficult treatment options, such as partial or total wrist arthrodesis.