Postpartum post-traumatic stress symptoms during the COVID-19 period: exposure and fear as mediating factors.

Background: Post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) following childbirth are common within a stressful environment and are mitigated by social support. During the COVID-19 pandemic, an increase in such symptoms has been reported. The current study aims to longitudinally model the influence of general and pandemic-specific risk and protective factors on the temporal unfolding of symptoms among postpartum women.Methods: Participants were 226 women following a liveborn, term birth during the first lockdown in Israel. Participants completed questionnaires 10 weeks (T1) and 6 months (T2) after delivery. PATH analyses included predictors of symptoms in T1: demographics, exposure to traumatic events, medical complications during delivery or pregnancy, exposure to COVID-19-related events and their subjective impact, fear of COVID-19, and social support. Predictors of symptoms in T2 were: T1 predictors, both as direct effects and mediated by T1 PTSS, as well as predictors measured again in T2.Results: Results showed the suggested model fit the data. The effect of COVID-19-related fear and subjective impact at T1 on symptoms at T2 were fully mediated by PTSS in T1, as were the effects of marriage and high social support at T1. COVID-19-related fear at T2 positively predicted symptoms at T2, while social support at T2 had the opposite effect. Medical complications during pregnancy negatively predicted symptoms in T2 only.Discussion: Persistent fear appears to be a risk factor and supports a consistent buffer in postpartum PTSS during the COVID-19 pandemic. Medical complications during pregnancy served as a protective factor, possibly due to habituation to medical settings.

Post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) following childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic may unfold in a unique manner, relating to pandemic-related stressors and fears.Women who experience stressful pandemic-related events are not at heightened risk of developing PTSS within the six months following birth, but those reporting COVID-19 related fears are.Women who had medical complications during pregnancy, but not delivery, are at lower risk of developing subsequent PTSS, perhaps due to their ongoing contact with medical facilities despite the pandemic.

The use of personal protective equipment as an independent factor for developing depressive and post-traumatic stress symptoms in the postpartum period.

BACKGROUND: New recommendations regarding the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during delivery have changed the maternal birth experience. In this study, we investigated the mental perceived impact of PPE use during delivery on the development of maternal postpartum depression (PPD) and post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study concerning women who delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic first lockdown period in Israel. Postpartum women were approached and asked to complete a comprehensive online questionnaire. Impact of PPE was graded on a scale of 1-5, and Impact of PPE ≥4 was considered high. PPD and PTSS were assessed using the EPDS and City BiTS questionnaires. RESULTS: Of 421 parturients, 36 (9%) reported high Impact of PPE. Parturients with high Impact of PPE had significantly higher PPD and PTSS scores)EPDS 8.4 ± 5.8 vs. 5.7 ± 5.3; City BiTS 9.2 ± 10.3 vs. 5.8 ± 7.8, p < 0.05 for both). Following adjustment for socio-demographic and delivery confounders and fear of COVID-19 (using Fear of COVID19 scale), Impact of PPE remained positively correlated with PPD symptoms (ß = 0.103, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.029-1.006, p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: When examining the risk factors for developing postpartum PTSS-experiences during labor and PPE were found to be significant variables. As the use of PPE is crucial in this era of COVID-19 pandemic in order to protect both parturients and caregivers, creative measures should be taken in order to overcome the communication gap it poses.

Should the interval between doses of antenatal corticosteroids be shortened in certain cases? Factors predicting preterm delivery < 48 h from presentation.

PURPOSE: Treatment with antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) to women at risk for preterm birth (PTB) is associated with a reduction in adverse neonatal outcomes. Obstetricians occasionally shorten the interval between the doses of steroids if delivery is predicted to occur before ACS are fully administered. In this study, we aimed to investigate predicting factors to identify patients that will deliver prematurely, less than 48 h from presentation. METHODS: The computerized medical files of all PTBs (< 34 weeks) were reviewed. Maternal demographics, pregnancy and delivery characteristics were compared between PTB that occurred < 48 h vs. > 48 h from triage presentation. RESULTS: In total, 494 PTB cases were included: 302 women in the study group (PTB < 48 h) and 192 women in the control group (PTB > 48 h). No significant differences were found in demographic characteristics between the groups. At presentation, the study group had higher rates of uterine contractions (p < 0.001) and cervical length < 25 mm (p < 0.001) as well as a higher rate of non-reassuring fetal (NRFHR) monitor (p < 0.001). In contrast, the control group presented with higher rates of preeclampsia (p = 0.003) and preterm premature rupture of membranes (p = 0.038). In multivariable analysis, all of the above factors remained significant after controlling for background confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Various factors at presentation can predict delivery < 48 h. These factors can be used to predict patients to whom the ACS interval should be shortened. Future prospective studies should investigate the effect of this shortening on neonatal outcomes.