RESUMO
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a frequent glomerular kidney disease that is revealed by proteinuria or even nephrotic syndrome. A diagnosis can be established from a kidney biopsy that shows focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis. This histopathological lesion may be caused by a primary podocyte injury (idiopathic FSGS) but is also associated with other pathologies (secondary FSGS). The first-line treatment for idiopathic FSGS with nephrotic syndrome is a prolonged course of corticosteroids. However, steroid resistance or steroid dependence is frequent, and despite intensified immunosuppressive treatment, FSGS can lead to end-stage renal failure. In addition, in some cases, FSGS can recur on a graft after kidney transplantation: an unidentified circulating factor may be implicated. Understanding of its physiopathology is unclear, and it remains an important challenge for the scientific community to identify a specific diagnostic biomarker and to develop specific therapeutics. This study reviews the treatment of primary FSGS and the recurrence of FSGS after kidney transplantation in adults.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Third generation parathyroid hormone (PTH) assays are new generation assays that do not recognize the PTH7-84 fragment whereas second generation assays detect both PTH1-84 and PTH7-84 fragments. Despite the excellent correlation between both assays in chronic renal failure (CRF) subjects, the mean PTH levels are typically 50% lower with the third compared to the second generation assays. The assessment of third generation PTH assays has not been extensively studied in hemodialysis subjects. The purpose of our study was to compare a third generation PTH assay to a second generation one in a population of hemodialysis subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 92 haemodialysis subjects (36 women and 56 men) with a mean age of 67±12.9 years were included in this study. Anthropometric and clinical parameters (Body Mass Index (BMI) and blood pressure) were measured. Second and third generation PTH assays (Cis biomedical and Diasorin respectively) were performed in each subject. In addition, the following biochemical tests were measured: 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-(OH)D), 1,25-hydroxyvitamin D (1,25-(OH)2D), crosslaps and alkaline phosphatase. RESULTS: The mean second and third generation PTHs are respectively 211±205 pg/ml and 151±164 pg/ml. The mean third generation PTH values are 28.4% lower compared to the second generation ones. Both methods are strongly correlated (r=0.923, p<0.001). This correlation persisted without any significant difference after controlling for gender, age, BMI and Blood Pressure. However, the difference between both methods increases when baseline PTH increases. Each of the second and third generation method is significantly correlated with hemodialysis duration (p<0.01), crosslaps (p<0.001), alkaline phosphatase (p<0.05), but not with age, BMI, Blood Pressure, 25-(OH)D or 1,25-(OH) 2D levels. CONCLUSION: Our results show that both second and third generation PTH methods are strongly correlated in hemodialysis patients mainly when PTH values are low. However, the difference between both methods increases when PTH values are high. More research is needed to establish which method is the gold standard when PTH values are high.
