RESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is no agreed gold standard method to confirm nasogastric tube position before every use. However, many global guidelines recommend testing the pH of gastric aspirates obtained from an NGT before each use. This study aims to determine whether ongoing pH testing has been shown to reduce adverse events. Secondary aims are to determine how frequently aspirates can be obtained, and how often pH correctly confirms ongoing NGT tip position. METHODS: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed and protocol was published on PROSPERO. Keywords were used to search PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL and MEDLINE. Article assessment for inclusion was completed by two independent authors and risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I. RESULTS: The systematic search and review methodology was followed due to wide variety and high risk of bias in the included studies. One full study and five abstracts met inclusion criteria for the primary aim. The full article contained one instance where pH testing and external NGT length together identified a misplaced NGT. The abstracts identified missed or delayed feeds and medications, and frequent unnecessary X-rays, as negative outcomes of ongoing pH testing. Ten full studies and one conference abstract addressed the secondary aims, but the studies varied widely which prevented meta-analysis and made it difficult to draw conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: This review confirmed that ongoing pH testing is based on expert opinion due to limited evidence. More primary research is required to determine the clinical impact of ongoing pH testing to confirm NGT position.