Effect of Thermomechanical Dynamic Loading on the Retention of Metallic and Nonmetallic Telescopic Mandibular Overdentures.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of thermomechanical dynamic loading on the retention of telescopic mandibular overdentures with different metallic and nonmetallic material combinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four groups were tested: (1) ZP (zirconia abutments/PEEK framework); (2) PP (PEEK abutments/PEEK framework); (3) TP (titanium abutments/PEEK framework); and (4) TG (titanium abutments/gold copings/cobalt-chromium framework). Each specimen contained four implants positioned over a polyvinylchloride-cylindrical base. After 10,000 removal/insertion cycles, the specimens were subjected to thermomechanical dynamic load in a chewing simulator for 1,200,000 loading cycles, corresponding to 5-year clinical fatigue. A screw was used to receive the chewing load, and 0.5 mm was permitted between the screw and the metal top fixed into the base to simulate the resilience of the posterior residual ridge tissues. Vertical chewing loads of 60 N were applied at a speed of 30 mm/second. Thermocycling was applied with a temperature ranging between 5°C and 55°C. The retentive force was measured using a universal testing machine 10 times before and after the thermomechanical dynamic loading test with a speed of 8 mm/second. RESULTS: The mean retentive force increased significantly from 13.2 (± 4.6) N to 16.4 (± 6.1) N in group ZP (P = .002), while in group TP, it decreased significantly from 4.9 (± 2.1) N to 3.3 (± 1.7) N (P = .046). There was no statistically significant change in the retentive force for groups PP and TG. CONCLUSIONS: The investigated metallic and nonmetallic combinations of double-crown-retained mandibular overdentures maintained acceptable levels of retention after thermomechanical dynamic loading. Further laboratory and clinical studies are needed before their routine clinical use can be recommended.

Effect of thermo-mechanical dynamic loading on the retention of metallic and non-metallic telescopic mandibular overdentures.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of thermomechanical dynamic loading on the retention of telescopic mandibular overdentures with different metallic and nonmetallic material combinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four groups were tested: (1) ZP (zirconia abutments/PEEK framework); (2) PP (PEEK abutments/PEEK framework); (3) TP (titanium abutments/PEEK framework); and (4) TG (titanium abutments/gold copings/cobalt-chromium framework). Each specimen contained four implants positioned over a polyvinylchloride-cylindrical base. After 10,000 removal/insertion cycles, the specimens were subjected to thermomechanical dynamic load in a chewing simulator for 1,200,000 loading cycles, corresponding to 5-year clinical fatigue. A screw was used to receive the chewing load, and 0.5 mm was permitted between the screw and the metal top fixed into the base to simulate the resilience of the posterior residual ridge tissues. Vertical chewing loads of 60 N were applied at a speed of 30 mm/second. Thermocycling was applied with a temperature ranging between 5°C and 55°C. The retentive force was measured using a universal testing machine 10 times before and after the thermomechanical dynamic loading test with a speed of 8 mm/second. RESULTS: The mean retentive force increased significantly from 13.2 (± 4.6) N to 16.4 (± 6.1) N in group ZP (P = .002), while in group TP, it decreased significantly from 4.9 (± 2.1) N to 3.3 (± 1.7) N (P = .046). There was no statistically significant change in the retentive force for groups PP and TG. CONCLUSIONS: The investigated metallic and nonmetallic combinations of double-crown-retained mandibular overdentures maintained acceptable levels of retention after thermomechanical dynamic loading. Further laboratory and clinical studies are needed before their routine clinical use can be recommended.

Retention of metallic and non-metallic double-crown-retained mandibular overdentures on implants: An in-vitro study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the change in the retention of novel metallic and non-metallic combinations for double-crown-retained mandibular overdentures on implants. METHODS: Cylindrical bases were used to insert four implants arranged in an arch, with 10 mm inter-implant spacing anteriorly, and 35 mm posteriorly. Five groups (n = 8 each) of different materials combinations were tested for retention: zirconia abutments/PEEK framework (ZP), PEEK abutments/PEEK framework (PP), titanium abutments/PEEK framework (TP), titanium abutments/CoCr framework (TC), and titanium abutments/gold copings/cobalt-chromium framework as the control group (TG). The abutment retention height was 4 mm with 1° convergence angle. The retention was measured in a wet condition using a chewing simulator initially, and then at 100, 200, 500, 1,000, 2,000, 3,000, 5,000, 8,000, and 10,000 insertion/separation cycles, which simulates the removing and inserting of an overdenture three times daily for 10 years of function. RESULTS: The initial median retention of all groups ranged from 10.0 to 33.3 N. After 10,000 insertion/separation cycles, the median retention ranged from 10.3 to 35.0 N. The change in the retention after 10,000 cycles was not statistically significant within groups ZP and TG. For groups PP and TP, there was a slight increase in retention with partial significance. The retention of group TC showed fluctuation with a partially significant decrease in retention. CONCLUSIONS: The use of novel metallic and non-metallic combinations in the construction of double-crown-retained mandibular overdentures on implants resulted in acceptable levels of retention and might be recommended for clinical application.