Cohort study on immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated acute kidney injury: Incidence, risk factors, and management strategies.

INTRODUCTION: Case studies and retrospective chart reviews of health system data have demonstrated an increased risk of nephrotoxicity in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors compared to clinical trials. This study investigated the frequency, causes, and risk factors for acute kidney injury in a real-world, rural setting. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who received at least one dose of a checkpoint inhibitor at a rural health system from May 2013 to February 2020 and who received at least one dose of a checkpoint inhibitor. Electronic and manual chart review helped to determine the incidence of, risk factors for, and renal outcomes and management strategies of checkpoint inhibitor-related acute kidney injury. Multivariable Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard models were used to assess the impact of patient characteristics on the incidence of sustained acute kidney injury and checkpoint inhibitor-induced acute kidney injury. RESULTS: After exclusion criteria, 906 patients who received at least one dose of a checkpoint inhibitor at Marshfield Clinic Health System during the study period were included. The incidence of acute kidney injury of any duration and due to any cause was 36.1%, while sustained acute kidney injury occurred in 28.7% of patients. Checkpoint inhibitor-related acute kidney injury was thought to have occurred in 2.7% of patients. Baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 was the sole predictor of checkpoint inhibitors-related acute kidney injury. Most patients with suspected checkpoint inhibitor-related acute kidney injury were managed with corticosteroids, and 62.5% experienced complete renal recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Ours is the first retrospective cohort study to test whether baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score and checkpoint inhibitor place in therapy were associated with checkpoint inhibitor-related acute kidney injury, and neither of these data points were found to be predictive. Even after expanding the parameters and methodologies of our study as compared to other retrospective cohort studies, we found only three baseline characteristics to be predictive of sustained acute kidney injury: Baseline eGFR, loop diuretic, and spironolactone use. For checkpoint inhibitor-related baseline, eGFR alone was predictive.

False Elevation of Troponin Levels in a Patient With Chest Pain and Significant Psychoemotional Stress.

We present a case of a 63-year-old woman who experienced significant psychoemotional stress and was seen in the emergency department for an evaluation of chest pain. She was sent home after reassurance. Subsequent troponin levels came back above the normal range. The patient was called back to the hospital for further assessment, including a potential workup for the exclusion of acute coronary syndrome, given the existing risk factors, symptoms, and elevated cardiac enzymes. The patient has risk factors for atherosclerosis, including hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and age. She has recently gone through hard personal, emotional, and psychosocial stress. She presented with atypical chest pain, subjective sense of breathlessness, and anxiety. She was reassured, had blood tests ordered, and was discharged after relative improvement. Later that day, her blood test results, which were taken earlier, showed elevated troponin levels. Therefore, she was asked to come back for a cardiology assessment and underwent coronary angiography, which showed normal patent coronary arteries. This case report highlights a patient with a non-cardiac elevation of troponin, emphasizing the importance of considering non-cardiac causes when interpreting elevated troponin levels. The objective of this report is to raise awareness among healthcare professionals regarding the potential causes of false troponin elevation and promote a comprehensive diagnostic approach to minimize unnecessary interventions.

Three-Year Survival after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Findings from the Marshfield Aortic Valve Experience (MAVE) Study.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a rapidly evolving treatment for severe aortic stenosis. However, uncertainties exist for optimal valve selection as there are few long-term studies comparing patient survival by valve type.Objective: We hypothesized that self-expandable valves (SEV) would provide a survival advantage over balloon expandable valves (BEV), as SEV continue to expand and might better accommodate to the anatomy of the aortic valve over time.Methods: We examined outcomes according to valve type from a rural tertiary referral center between 2012 and 2017.Results: Out of 269 patients, 77 deaths (28.6%) occurred over the study period with 6 deaths by 1 month post-TAVR and 37 deaths by 1 year post-TAVR. The median observation time for survivors was 21.5 months. The probability of survival at 3 years was 60.7% and 61.9% for patients who underwent treatment with SEV and BEV, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in overall patient survival with or without adjustment for factors such as age, sex, race, and aortic valve area. Additionally, in a secondary analysis restricted to those patients treated in later years (2015-2017) survival among patients with BEV appeared superior (HR=0.456, P=0.015).Conclusion: Patients who underwent TAVR at a rural medical center with SEV showed similar survival compared to those who received a BEV. Superior survival was observed among those who received BEV versus SEV between 2015 and 2017.