Serum Hepcidin and GDF-15 levels as prognostic markers in urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract and renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Cancer is a life-threatening disease that causes every fourth death. It is often hard to determine the time point of progression. Therefore, biomarkers for cancer entities that indicate disease progression or aggressiveness and thereby guide therapeutic decisions are required. Unfortunately, reliable biomarkers are rare. In this study, the potential of serum hepcidin and serum GDF-15 as biomarkers that correlate with patient's survival in the two entities upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UUTUC) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were analyzed. METHODS: In this retrospective study n = 38 patients suffering from UUTUC, n = 94 patients suffering from RCC and n = 21 patients without infections or cancer, all hospitalized at the University Hospital Muenster, were included. Serum samples of patients were retrospectively analyzed. Serum hepcidin and GDF-15 levels were measured and correlated to aggressiveness and progression of the disease as well as patient's outcome. RESULTS: For both entities, UUTUC and RCC, serum hepcidin levels as well as serum GDF-15 levels were increased compared to sera of controls. High serum hepcidin and GDF-15 levels were associated with metastases and cancer relapse. Also, in both entities, the overall survival was decreased in patients with increased serum hepcidin and GDF-15 levels. Hence, high serum hepcidin and GDF-15 levels correlated with patient's outcome. CONCLUSION: To conclude, the data of this study show a correlation of high serum hepcidin and GDF-15 levels with aggressiveness and progression of the disease and demonstrate potential prognostic properties of serum hepcidin and GDF-15 levels. The data support the further assessment of serum hepcidin and GDF-15 as prognostic markers in RCC and UUTUC.

Hepcidin as a potential predictor for preoperative anemia treatment with intravenous iron-A retrospective pilot study.

Preoperative anemia occurs in about one third of patients who undergo elective surgery and is associated with an impaired outcome. Therefore, screening of preoperative anemia was established in the context of a multidisciplinary Patient Blood Management (PBM) program at the University Hospital of Muenster, Germany. Anemic patients without contraindications were treated with intravenous (IV) iron (ferric carboxymaltose) to increase their hemoglobin (Hgb) levels and hence to treat anemia prior to surgery. Interestingly, we detected a large variability in the response of Hgb levels after IV iron administration. Systemic iron homeostasis is mainly regulated by the hepatic hormone hepcidin, which regulates the cell surface expression of the sole known iron exporter ferroportin. The objective of this retrospective pilot study was to analyze the potential of hepcidin to predict the response of anemic patients to preoperative IV iron treatment measured as increase in Hgb. Serum samples of non-anemic (n = 48), untreated anemic (n = 64) and anemic patients treated with IV iron (n = 79), in total 191 patients, were collected between October 2014 until June 2016. Serum hepcidin levels were determined and data were analyzed retrospectively. The analysis revealed at first a correlation between serum hepcidin levels and the parameters of the iron status. Second, patients treated with IV iron showed a noticeably higher increase in their delta Hgb level between PBM consultation and surgery (0.45g/dl [0.05, 1.05] compared to patients without IV iron (0.1g/dl [-0.48, 0.73], *p = 0.03). Patients were then grouped into 'non-responders', defined as delta Hgb <0.6g/dl and 'responders', with delta Hgb ≥0.6g/dl between the day of IV iron treatment and the day of surgery. Within normal ranges and clinically unapparent, a statistically noticeable difference between responders and non-responders was found for CRP and leukocytes. Serum hepcidin levels were higher in the group of non-responders (10.6ng/ml [3.93, 34.77]) compared to responders (2.1ng/ml [0.25, 7.97], *p = 0.04). To conclude, the data of this retrospective pilot study indicate that hepcidin might be a promising biomarker to predict a patient`s responsiveness to IV iron in preoperative anemia treatment. Prospective studies have to investigate serum hepcidin levels as a biomarker to guide physician`s decision on IV iron substitution.

Treating Anemia in the Preanesthesia Assessment Clinic: Results of a Retrospective Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative anemia is challenging during hospital stay because anemia and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions are associated with an increased morbidity and mortality. With the implementation of patient blood management (PBM), a preanesthesia assessment clinic to screen and treat anemia before elective surgery was institutionalized at Muenster University Hospital, Germany. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the association between treating preoperative anemic patients with intravenous iron (IVI) and (primarily) presurgical hemoglobin levels and (secondarily) use of RBCs and mortality. METHODS: Between April 1, 2014, and July 4, 2016, patients scheduled for elective surgery with a risk for RBC transfusions >10% in 2013 were screened for preoperative anemia and, if indicated, treated with IVI. Patients' data, time span between visit in the anesthesia/PBM clinic and surgery, demographic data, type of surgery, the difference of hemoglobin levels between visit and surgery, RBC transfusion, infectious-related International Classification of Disease codes during hospital stay, and 1-year survival were determined retrospectively by screening electronic data files. In addition, patients were interviewed about adverse events, health-related events, and infections via telephone 30, 90, and 365 days after visiting the anesthesia/PBM clinic. RESULTS: A total of 1101 patients were seen in the anesthesia/PBM clinic between days -28 and -1 (median [Q1-Q3], -3 days [-1, -9 days]) before elective surgery. Approximately 29% of patients presented with anemia, 46.8% of these anemic patients were treated with ferric carboxymaltose (500-1000 mg).In the primary analysis, hemoglobin levels at median were associated with a reduction between the visit in the anesthesia/PBM clinic and the surgery in all nonanemic patients on beginning of medical treatment (nonanemic patients at median -2.8 g/dL [-4, -0.9 g/dL], while anemic patients without IVI presented with median differences of -0.8 g/dL [-2, 0 g/dL] and anemic patients with IVI of 0 g/dL [-1.0, 0.5 g/dL]). Hemoglobin levels raised best at substitution 22-28 days before surgery (0.95 g/dL [-0.35, 1.18 g/dL]). Due to the selection criteria, transfusion rates were high in the cohort. Overall, there was no association between IVI treatment and the use of RBC transfusions (odds ratio for use of RBCs in anemic patients, no IVI versus IVI: 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.82). Patients treated with or without IVI presented a comparable range of International Classification of Disease codes related to infections. Telephone interviews indicated similar adverse events, health-related events, and infections. Cox regression analysis showed an association between anemia and reduced survival, regardless of IVI. CONCLUSIONS: An anemia clinic within the preanesthesia assessment clinic is a feasible and effective approach to treat preoperative anemia. The IVI supplementation was safe but was associated with decreased RBC transfusions in gynecology/obstetric patients only. The conclusions from this retrospective analysis have to be tested in prospective, controlled trials.

Intravenous Iron for Treatment of Anemia in the 3 Perisurgical Phases: A Review and Analysis of the Current Literature.

Anemia is a common comorbidity throughout the entire hospital stay. Treatment options include intravenous (IV) iron, oral iron, erythropoietin, and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. IV iron has gained in popularity with the implementation of patient blood management programs. A variety of studies have been performed to investigate the use of IV iron in preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative settings. An objective review on these studies has yet to be performed. The current narrative review provides an overview of trials investigating IV iron use in the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative settings. We performed a literature research of English articles published between 1964 and March 2017 in Pubmed including Medline and The Cochrane Library. Only studies with a control group were included. The final review includes 20 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 7 observational trials, and 5 retrospective studies. Measured outcomes included hemoglobin (Hb) levels, reticulocyte counts, and/or RBC concentrates. Meta-analyses of RCTs using IV iron administration before surgery led to an increase in Hb levels, a reduction of RBC use, and an improvement in patient outcome. Only a few studies investigated the use of IV iron in the perioperative setting. These studies recommended the use of perioperative IV iron in cases of severe anemia in orthopedic surgery but not in all types of surgery. Published RCTs in the postoperative setting have shown positive effects of IV iron on Hb levels, length of hospital stay, and transfusion requirements. Some studies demonstrated an increase of Hb of 0.5-1 g/dL over 4 weeks postoperatively, but the clinical relevance and effect of this increase on an improvement of patient's long-term outcomes are uncertain. To summarize, the evidence to use IV iron is strongest in the preoperative setting, while it remains an individual treatment decision to administer IV iron perioperatively or postoperatively.

[Organization of an anaesthesia preoperative evaluation clinic - The Anaesthesia/Patient Blood Management Clinic: one Model]. / Organisation der Prämedikationsambulanz - Die Anästhesie-†/†Patient Blood Management-Sprechstunde: ein Modell.

The anesthesia preoperative evaluation has been developed in recent years in a centralized clinic, that can be visited by the majority of patients, in order to evaluate and obtain patient's consent for anesthesia. In the current article, the organization and structure of such a central anesthesia preoperative evaluation clinic in the Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine at the University Hospital of Muenster, is described. Besides the central preoperative evaluation clinic, 3 clinics are localized in separate buildings and preoperative visits have to be completed in special scenarios on the wards, too. A pharmaceutical evaluation for patient's medication and the patient blood management have been integrated into the anesthesia preoperative evaluation clinic. Processes are explained and current numbers of patients are mentioned.