Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BJU Int ; 126(5): 633-640, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32741099

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (posterior approach) on early recovery of urinary continence (UC) compared to the conventional approach (anterior approach) for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: A total of 110 consecutive patients with clinically localized PCa were prospectively randomized in a 1:1 ratio to an anterior group (n = 55) or a posterior group (n = 55). The primary outcome was immediate UC, defined as freedom from any pad use within 1 week after removal of the urinary catheter. The UC rate following surgery was also calculated with Kaplan-Meier curves, and the log-rank test was used for statistical comparison. Intra-operative outcomes, pathological data and oncological outcomes, including positive surgical margin (PSM) status and biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS), were also compared between the two groups. The comparison of the two approaches was also analysed in subgroups after risk stratification. RESULTS: Of the patients who underwent the posterior approach, 69.1% achieved immediate UC compared with 30.9% in the anterior group (relative risk 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48-3.51; P = 0.000). The relative Kaplan-Meier curves for UC during the 12-month follow-up revealed statistically better recovery in the posterior group when compared with the anterior group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.51, 95% CI 1.01-2.24; log-rank P = 0.007). No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups regarding complications (P = 0.399), PSM status (P = 0.225) or BCRFS (HR 4.80, 95% CI 0.97-23.78; log-rank P = 0.111). In sub-analyses, no significant difference between the two approaches with regard to UC recovery in patients with high-risk PCa was observed (HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.63-2.51; log-rank P = 0.415). CONCLUSIONS: The Retzius-sparing approach significantly improved early recovery of UC compared to the conventional approach. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the benefits of the Retzius-sparing approach for clinically localized PCa, especially for high-risk cases.


Assuntos
Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Prostatectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Incontinência Urinária/epidemiologia , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Próstata/cirurgia , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...