A comparison of severity of illness between the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant and Delta variant.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionally affected traditionally marginalized groups. Both the Delta and Omicron variants raised concern amongst public health officials due to potentially higher infectivity rates and disease severity than prior variants. This study sought to compare disease severity between adults infected with the Omicron variant and adults infected with the Delta variant who presented to the Emergency Department at an academic, safety-net hospital in Virginia. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used electronic medical record data of patients who presented to the Emergency Department and received a positive SARS-CoV-2 test between September 1, 2021, and January 31, 2022. Positive tests were stratified by genotypic variant through whole genome sequencing. Participants with the Omicron variant were propensity scores matched with individuals with the Delta variant. Results: Among 500 Delta and 500 Omicron participants, 279 propensity score-matched pairs were identified. Participants were predominantly unvaccinated, with medical comorbidities, and self-identified as Black. Individuals infected with the Delta variant had more severe disease compared to those with the Omicron variant, regardless of vaccination status. Patients with kidney, liver, and respiratory disease, as well as cancer, are at higher risk for severe disease. Patients with 2 doses of COVID-19 immunization trended toward less severe disease. Conclusions: Overall, these data further support the literature regarding the disproportionate effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on vulnerable patient populations - such as those with limited access to care, people of color, and those with chronic medical conditions - and can be used to inform public health interventions.

An Integrated Care Model for Pregnant and Postpartum Individuals Receiving Medication for Opioid Use Disorder.

OBJECTIVES: Perinatal opioid use disorder is increasing. Integrated obstetric/addiction care models likely optimize parent-infant dyad outcomes, but the ideal combination of services is unknown. This study (1) describes pregnancy-to-postpartum service utilization by people receiving buprenorphine at an integrated Obstetric/Addiction Clinic and (2) explores the association between service utilization and postpartum buprenorphine continuation. METHODS: This retrospective medical record review study uses research registry data from an outpatient Obstetric/Addiction Clinic. All patients are invited to participate in the research registry. For patients who consent, monthly medical record abstractions are conducted beginning with their first clinic visit to collect demographic, obstetric, and substance use disorder treatment variables. Present analyses included patients who delivered an infant between June 2019 and June 2021, started buprenorphine during pregnancy, and were receiving buprenorphine at delivery. Overall service utilization was the number of services (range 0-12) used between 28-weeks gestation and 12-weeks postpartum. Bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression assessed associations between service utilization and buprenorphine continuation. RESULTS: Participants (n = 42) were primarily non-Latinx White (67%) with comorbid psychiatric diagnoses (95%). On average, participants used 6 services; prenatal care, mental health care, and postpartum contraception were most utilized. Overall, 69% of participants continued buprenorphine at 6 months postpartum. This did not differ by level of service utilization (bivariate [ P = 0.07], multivariable [ P = 0.16]). CONCLUSION: Integrated care with a harm reduction focus supports pregnancy-to-postpartum service utilization and buprenorphine continuation in a patient sample at high risk for medication for opioid use disorder discontinuation. Further work is needed to identify evidence-based methods to individualize integrated obstetric/addiction care.

Journey to the other side of the brain: asymmetry in patients with chronic mild or moderate traumatic brain injury.

Aim: Patients with chronic mild or moderate traumatic brain injury have some regions of brain atrophy (including cerebral white matter) but even more regions of abnormal brain enlargement (including other cerebral regions). Hypothesis: Ipsilateral injury and atrophy cause the eventual development of contralateral compensatory hypertrophy. Materials & methods: 50 patients with mild or moderate traumatic brain injury were compared to 80 normal controls (n = 80) with respect to MRI brain volume asymmetry. Asymmetry-based correlations were used to test the primary hypothesis. Results: The group of patients had multiple regions of abnormal asymmetry. Conclusion: The correlational analyses supported the conclusion that acute injury to ipsilateral cerebral white matter regions caused atrophy, leading eventually to abnormal enlargement of contralateral regions due to compensatory hypertrophy.

Patients with chronic mild or moderate traumatic brain injury have abnormal brain enlargement.

Introduction: Much less is known about brain volume abnormalities in patients with chronic mild or moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI) compared with patients with more severe injury. Commercially available software methods including NeuroQuant® are being used increasingly to assess MRI brain volume in patients with TBI.Methods: 50 patients with mild or moderate TBI were compared to the NeuroQuant® normal control database (n = thousands) with respect to MRI brain volume.Results: The patients had many areas of abnormal enlargement and fewer areas of atrophy, including abnormally small cerebral white matter (CWM) limited to the first 10 months after injury. Examination of correlations within the patient group between CWM volume and volumes of the abnormally enlarged regions showed multiple significant negative correlations, indicating that CWM atrophy correlated with enlargement of the other regions.Discussion: The finding of many regions of abnormal brain enlargement was relatively new, although a couple of previous studies of patients with mild TBI found similar but more limited findings. The cause of the abnormal enlargement was unknown, but possibilities included: (1) hyperactivity and hypertrophy; or (2) chronic neuro-inflammation and edema.Abbreviations: ADNI: Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative; CWM: cerebral white matter; GM: cerebral cortical gray matter; ICC: intraclass correlations coefficient; IFT: infratentorial; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; mTBI: mild TBI; NQ: NeuroQuant®; SCN: subcortical nuclei; t0: time of injury; t1: time of first NeuroQuanted MRI scan after injury; t2: time of second NeuroQuanted MRI scan after injury; TBI: traumatic brain injury; VBR: ventricle-to-brain ratio; WBP: whole-brain parenchyma.