Cluster randomised controlled trial of specialist-led integrated COPD care (INTEGR COPD).

OBJECTIVE: Studies in hospital settings demonstrate that there is greater guideline adherence when care is delivered by a respiratory specialist, however, this has not been explored in primary care. The aim of this study is to determine the impact integrating respiratory specialists into primary care has on the delivery of guideline adherent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) care. METHODS: 18 general practitioner (GP) practices were randomised to provide either usual or specialist-led COPD care. Patients at participating practices were included if they had an existing diagnosis of COPD. Outcomes were measured at the individual patient level. The primary outcome was guideline adherence, assessed as achieving four or more items of the COPD care bundle. Secondary outcome measures included quality of life, number of exacerbations, number of COPD-related hospitalisations and respiratory outpatient attendances. RESULTS: 586 patients from 10 practices randomised to the intervention and 656 patients from 8 practices randomised to the control arm of the study were included. The integration of respiratory specialists into GP practices led to a statistically significant (p<0.001) improvement in the provision of guideline adherent care when compared with usual care in this cohort (92.7% vs 70.1%) (OR 4.14, 95% CI 2.14 to 8.03). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to demonstrate that guideline adherence is improved through the integration of respiratory specialists into GP practices to deliver annual COPD reviews. To facilitate changes in current healthcare practice and policy, the findings of this paper need to be viewed in combination with qualitative research exploring the acceptability of specialist integration. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03482700.

Quality of Life and Mortality Outcomes for Augmentation Naïve and Augmented Patients with Severe Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency.

Background: Intravenous alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) augmentation therapy is the only specific treatment available for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD)-related lung disease. It is widely used worldwide but remains unavailable to patients with AATD in the United Kingdom. While randomized trials of augmentation therapy have demonstrated biochemical efficacy and lung tissue preservation using computed tomography (CT) densitometry, these studies were not adequately powered to demonstrate effectiveness in well-accepted clinical endpoints such as quality of life (QOL) or survival. We used large, prospectively followed AATD patient populations in the United States and United Kingdom to explore these important clinical endpoints. Methods: Our inclusion criterion was adults with severe AATD and associated lung disease. The treatment group was U.S. AATD patients receiving augmentation therapy for lung disease. The control group was augmentation therapy naïve AATD patients. Multivariable regression and survival analyses were used to assess QOL and mortality outcomes respectively. Results: Mean annual deterioration of the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score was 1.43 points greater/year in the control group compared to those receiving augmentation therapy (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47 to 2.39, p=0.003). At 7 years, median survival was 82.7% (95% CI 75.3 to 90.7) for the control group versus 87.8% (95% CI 82.8 to 93.2) in the augmentation group, p=0.66. There was significant heterogeneity between cohorts. Conclusions: A comparison of 2 highly characterized AATD cohorts was not able to reliably determine if AAT augmentation therapy improves QOL or mortality in patients with severe AATD-related lung disease. Alternative surrogate biomarkers of disease progression, such as CT lung density, may be a more pragmatic option.

Exacerbations of Lung Disease in Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency.

Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is an important risk factor for development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Patients with AATD classically develop a different pattern of lung disease from those with usual COPD, decline faster and exhibit a range of differences in pathogenesis, all of which may be relevant to phenotype and/or impact of exacerbations. There are a number of definitions of exacerbation, with the main features being worsening of symptoms over at least 2 days, which may be associated with a change in treatment. In this article we review the literature surrounding exacerbations in AATD, focusing, in particular, on ways in which they may differ from such events in usual COPD, and the potential impact on clinical management.