Topical minocycline foam 4%: Results of four phase 1 studies evaluating the potential for phototoxicity, photoallergy, sensitization, and cumulative irritation.

FMX101 4% contains 4% micronized minocycline (as an HCl) formulated in a lipophilic foam vehicle for topical administration. FMX101 4% has been shown to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment for moderate-to-severe acne in three Phase 3 pivotal studies, however, skin sensitization and toxicity potential remains to be fully evaluated. Four single-center, randomized, controlled, within-subject comparison studies were conducted to evaluate the potential for phototoxicity, photoallergy, skin sensitization, and cumulative skin irritation with topical administration of FMX101 4% and the corresponding vehicle. Across the four studies, healthy male and non-pregnant female volunteers (age ≥18 years) were randomized to FMX101 4%, vehicle, or other controls. In the phototoxicity study, treated skin was irradiated at 3 and 24 hr post-application, and local tolerability was assessed pre- and post-irradiation. In the photoallergy study, the skin was treated and irradiated (post-24 hr) twice weekly for 3 wk (induction phase), rested for 10-17 d, and naive skin sites were treated and irradiated (challenge phase); skin reactions were assessed after patch removal and post-irradiation. In the sensitization study, the skin was treated for 3 wk (induction phase), then rested for 10-14 d, and naive skin sites were treated for 48 hr (challenge phase); contact sensitization was assessed for both phases. In the cumulative irritation study, treatment and vehicle were applied daily for 21 d; skin irritation was assessed after each application. In all studies, standard safety assessments were conducted. A total of 32, 56, 233, and 42 subjects were enrolled in the phototoxicity, photoallergy, sensitization, and skin irritation studies, respectively. There was no evidence of phototoxicity, photoallergy, skin sensitization, or skin irritation potential with FMX101 4%. Few adverse events, mostly mild to moderate, were reported. In conclusion, FMX101 4% appeared to be well tolerated and non-irritating, and was considered to be non-sensitizing, non-phototoxic, and non-photoallergic.

Open-label Extension Study Evaluating Long-term Safety and Efficacy of FMX101 4% Minocycline Foam for Moderate-to-Severe Acne Vulgaris.

Objective: This study sought to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of FMX101 4% topical minocycline foam for the treatment of moderate-to-severe acne. Design: This was an open-label extension of two double-blind studies, Study 04 and Study 05. Setting: Subjects were enrolled at 35 sites in the United States and one site in the Dominican Republic. Participants: Eligible subjects who completed 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with FMX101 4% or vehicle in those studies could continue for an additional nine months of open-label treatment with FMX101 4%. Eligibility required an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score that had not worsened when compared to baseline at the 12-week visit. Measurements: Safety, efficacy, and satisfaction assessments were performed. Results: Of the 961 subjects enrolled in Study 04 (n=466) and Study 05 (n=495), 657 subjects entered the open-label phase (Study 04: n=284; Study 05: n=373), with 414 subjects completing the study (Study 04, n=172; Study 05, n = 242). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar to those in the double-blind studies. No serious TEAEs led to subject discontinuation. At Week 52, for facial tolerability assessment, over 95 percent of subjects had no or only mild signs and symptoms. Through Week 52, there were ongoing reductions in inflammatory lesions and increasing IGA treatment success. Conclusion: FMX101 4% minocycline foam appeared to be safe, effective, and well-tolerated for up to 52 weeks in the treatment of moderate-to-severe acne.

A novel topical minocycline foam for the treatment of moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris: Results of 2 randomized, double-blind, phase 3 studies.

BACKGROUND: FMX101 4% is a topical minocycline foam for the treatment of moderate-to-severe acne. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of FMX101 4% in treating moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris. METHODS: Two identical phase 3 studies were conducted. Subjects were randomized 2:1 to once-daily FMX101 4% or foam vehicle for 12 weeks. The coprimary end points were the change in inflammatory lesion count from baseline and the rate of treatment success according to the Investigator's Global Assessment (a score of 0 or 1 for clear or almost clear, with a ≥2-grade improvement) at week 12. RESULTS: A total of 961 subjects were enrolled (study 04, N = 466; study 05, N = 495). Compared with vehicle, FMX101 4% demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in inflammatory lesions in both studies (P < .05) and a greater rate of treatment success in study 05 according to the Investigator's Global Assessment (P < .05). Pooled analyses of the 2 studies demonstrated statistical significance for both coprimary end points (all P < .05). Noninflammatory lesion count was also significantly reduced with FMX101 4% versus with vehicle in both studies. FMX101 4% was generally safe and well tolerated. Skin-related adverse events were reported in less than 1% of subjects treated with FMX101 4%. LIMITATIONS: Longer-term efficacy and safety outcomes are needed (ongoing). CONCLUSION: FMX101 4% topical minocycline foam significantly reduced both inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions and improved Investigator's Global Assessment scores in patients with moderate-to-severe acne.

Pharmacokinetic Comparison of Once-Daily Topical Minocycline Foam 4% vs Oral Minocycline for Moderate-to-Severe Acne.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize minocycline pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability following multiple-dose topical administration of minocycline hydrochloride (HCl) foam 4% (FMX101 4%) as compared with single-dose oral administration of minocycline HCl extended-release tablets (Solodyn®) in subjects with moderate-to-severe acne. METHODS: A Phase 1, single-center, nonrandomized, open-label, active-controlled, 2-period, 2-treatment crossover clinical study. The study included 30 healthy adults (mean age, 22.6 years; 90% white, and 60% females) who had moderate-to-severe acne. Subjects were assigned to first receive a single oral dose of a minocycline HCl extended-release tablet (approximately 1 mg/kg). At 10 days after the oral minocycline dose, topical minocycline foam 4% was applied, once daily for 21 days. Serial blood samples were obtained before and after administration of oral minocycline and each topical application of minocycline foam 4% on days 1, 12, and 21. RESULTS: Following oral administration of minocycline (approximately 1 mg/kg), plasma minocycline concentration increased until 3 hours, followed by a log-linear decrease over the remainder of the 96-hour sampling period. Following topical application of a 4-g maximal-use dose of minocycline foam 4% for 21 days, plasma minocycline concentration was very low, with geometric mean Cmax values ranging from 1.1 ng/mL to 1.5 ng/mL. Steady state was achieved by day 6. Overall, minocycline exposure with topical minocycline foam 4% was 730 to 765 times lower than that with oral minocycline. There was no evidence of minocycline accumulation over the 21 days of topical application of minocycline foam 4%. Topical minocycline foam 4% appeared to be safe and well tolerated, with no serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), treatment-related TEAEs, or TEAEs that led to treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Once-daily topical application of minocycline foam 4% did not lead to significant systemic exposure to minocycline. It appears to be a well-tolerated treatment option for individuals with moderate-to-severe acne.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16(10):1022-1028.

Norethindrone acetate 1.0 milligram and ethinyl estradiol 10 micrograms as an ultra low-dose oral contraceptive.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of an extended-duration, combined hormonal oral contraceptive pill (OCP) that reduces the estrogen exposure by almost half compared with other OCPs. METHODS: This open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter study used an ultra low-dose OCP (1.0 mg norethindrone acetate and 10 micrograms ethinyl E2). The OCP was administered in a regimen of 24 days of a 28-day cycle followed by 10 micrograms ethinyl E2 for 2 days and an inactive tablet for 2 days. The study included healthy, heterosexually active women aged 18-45 years who were at risk of pregnancy. RESULTS: The discontinuation rate was 41.7% (692/1,660 patients). Twenty-six pregnancies occurred in 1,555 participants during 15,596 at-risk cycles, resulting in a Pearl Index of 2.2 and a cumulative pregnancy rate of 2.1 for the overall population. Participants experienced an average of 2.6 days of intracyclic (unscheduled) bleeding or spotting per cycle over treatment cycles 213. Intracyclic bleeding was more common in users new to OCPs than in users switching from another OCP and in women aged 18-35 years compared with those aged 36 years or older. The frequency of bleeding episodes decreased after cycle 2 and throughout treatment in all subpopulations. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study demonstrate that this ultra low-dose OCP regimen is effective in preventing pregnancy with a safety and tolerability profile that is comparable with that reported for other low-dose OCPs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00391807. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Efficacy and safety of a new 24-day oral contraceptive regimen of norethindrone acetate 1 mg/ethinyl estradiol 20 micro g (Loestrin 24 Fe).

BACKGROUND: New low-dose formulations of combination oral contraceptives (COCs) are safe and effective, but they may be associated with an increased risk of breakthrough bleeding. Extending the duration of active hormonal treatment may reduce the frequency of intracyclic bleeding/spotting while maintaining efficacy and tolerability. METHODS: This 6-month, open-label, randomized, active-controlled study involved healthy women aged 18-45 years who were at risk for pregnancy. Women were randomized 4:1 to a 24-day regimen of norethindrone acetate 1 mg/ethinyl estradiol 20 micro g (NETA/EE-24) or to a 21-day regimen of the same combination (NETA/EE-21). The outcomes assessed included pregnancy and incidence, duration of bleeding and intensity of bleeding. RESULTS: The cumulative risk of pregnancy in the NETA/EE-24 group (n=705) was 0.9% during six cycles of treatment. Compared with NETA/EE-21 (n=181), NETA/EE-24 was associated with significantly fewer intracyclic bleeding days (0.95 vs. 1.63; p=.005), fewer days of withdrawal bleeding (2.66 vs. 3.88; p<.001) and fewer total bleeding/spotting days for Cycles 2-6 (18.6 vs. 23.2; p<.001). NETA/EE-24 was well tolerated, and side effects were generally mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: NETA/EE-24 is an effective well-tolerated COC that is associated with a bleeding profile more favorable than that of NETA/EE-21.

Effects of low-dose norethindrone acetate plus ethinyl estradiol (0.5 mg/2.5 microg) in women with postmenopausal symptoms: updated analysis of three randomized, controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Based on the potential risks of post-menopausal hormone therapy (HT) found by the Women's Health Initiative, guidelines for HT now recommend use of the lowest effective dose and shortest treatment duration consistent with individual treatment goals. Current (2003) guidance established by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends that clinical assessments of HT include women with more frequent and more intense vasomotor symptoms than previously studied. Therefore, this analysis was conducted to further assess the efficacy of a low-dose combination of norethindrone acetate and ethinyl estradiol (NA/EE) previously assessed in dose-ranging studies, while meeting conservative FDA trial design and analysis criteria. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this post hoc analysis and overview was to present data on the efficacy and tolerability of a low-dose combination-NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 microg-in the treatment of postmenopausal symptoms, based on data from previously published studies of NA/EE. In addition, the effects of low-dose NA/EE on bone and endometrium are briefly reviewed. METHODS: Data from 3 previously published randomized, placebo-controlled trials were analyzed using current FDA guidance for the assessment of HT in postmenopausal women. Studies 1 and 2 assessed the efficacy of NA/EE at various doses, including 0.5 mg/2.5 microg, in vasomotor symptom (hot-flush [HF]) relief over 16 and 12 weeks, respectively, using self-reporting of symptom frequency and intensity (scores: 0=none; 1=mild; 2=moderate; and 3=severe) in daily diaries. Study 3 assessed the effects of NA/EE at various doses, including 0.5 mg/2.5 microg, on bone and endometrium, using quantitative computed tomography of the lumbar spine at 12 and 24 months and endometrial biopsy at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of treatment. In all 3 studies, women were asked to record vaginal bleeding and spotting in diaries. Any adverse events were recorded in diaries and/or at clinic visits. Physical and gynecologic examinations and standard clinical laboratory testing were conducted at baseline and at appropriate follow-up visits in all 3 studies. RESULTS: Studies 1, 2, and 3 enrolled 219, 266, and 1265 women, respectively. Overall, in studies 1 and 2, 91% of women were white, the mean age was approximately 52 years, and mean time since last menstrual period was approximately 24 months. In study 1, NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 microg was associated with significant reductions from baseline in mean weekly total HF frequency from week 4 (63.6%) through week 16 (73.7%) (all, P<0.05). In study 2, the frequency of moderate or severe HFs was decreased by 61.1% at week 4 (P<0.05) and by 82.2% at week 12 (P<0.001) with NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 microg, and the mean intensity score was significantly lower than that with placebo at weeks 8 and 12 (both, P=0.001). In study 3, cumulative amenorrhea rates were approximately 90% in the NA/EE 0.5-mg/2.5-microg and placebo groups at 12 months. Lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was maintained at 24 months with NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 microg but was significantly decreased from baseline, by 7.4%, in the placebo group (P<0.001). Endometrial hyperplasia was not observed in the group receiving NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 microg over 24 months. The tolerability of NA/EE was similar to that of placebo. The most common adverse events experienced with NA/EE were headache (15.2%), abdominal pain (10.2%), and breast pain (9.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The results from this post hoc analysis and overview of 3 previously published studies suggest that NA/EE 0.5 mg/2.5 microg was associated with decreased frequency and intensity of vasomotor symptoms. This dose of NA/EE was also associated with maintenance of BMD over 24 months, a significant positive effect on BMD compared with placebo. Low-dose NA/EE was also associated with cumulative amenorrhea rates comparable to those of placebo and was not associated with endometrial hyperplasia. This dose was well tolerated, with rates of adverse events generally similar to those of placebo.

Efficacy of a new, oral estradiol acetate formulation for relief of menopause symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of three doses of a new, oral formulation of estradiol acetate (EA) for alleviation of vasomotor and urogenital symptoms in postmenopausal women. DESIGN: Two separate 12-week studies were undertaken in postmenopausal women with moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms. In the first study, women were randomly assigned to EA 0.9 mg/day, EA 1.8 mg/day, or placebo (study 1; N = 293), and in the second study to oral EA 0.45 mg/day or placebo (study 2; N = 259). Women recorded the frequency and severity of vasomotor symptoms daily and urogenital symptoms weekly on diary cards. Investigators assessed signs of vaginal atrophy. RESULTS: Frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms decreased significantly versus placebo, starting at week 2 in the EA 1.8-mg group (P = 0.005), week 3 in the EA 0.9-mg group (P = 0.003), and week 6 in the EA 0.45-mg group (P < 0.05). At week 12, mean percent reduction from baseline in vasomotor-symptom frequency was 91%, 78%, and 61%, respectively. Vasomotor-symptom severity decreased significantly versus placebo, starting at weeks 2 and 3 with EA 1.8 mg and 0.9 mg, respectively, and at week 5 with EA 0.45 mg. Vaginal pH and maturation index improved significantly in all EA groups versus placebo, and some signs and symptoms of vaginal atrophy improved at the EA 0.9- and 1.8-mg doses. Side effects were mild to moderate and consistent with estrogen therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Oral EA at all doses was well tolerated and significantly reduced the frequency and severity of postmenopause symptoms versus placebo.

Comparative controlled trial of a novel oral estrogen therapy, estradiol acetate, for relief of menopause symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of a new oral estradiol prodrug, estradiol acetate, with micronized estradiol or conjugated equine estrogens for alleviation of postmenopausal vasomotor and urogenital symptoms. DESIGN: A total of 249 postmenopausal women experiencing seven or more moderate or severe vasomotor symptoms daily for 1 week or 60 or more symptoms in 1 week were randomized to 0.9 mg of estradiol acetate (n = 79), 1 mg of micronized estradiol (n = 85), or 0.625 mg of conjugated equine estrogens therapy (n = 85). Efficacy endpoints were the change in frequency and severity of vasomotor symptoms from baseline to week 12, participant-assessed urogenital symptoms, and investigator-assessed signs of vaginal atrophy. Efficacy results were considered equivalent if estradiol acetate was at least 80% as effective as estradiol and conjugated estrogens. RESULTS: At week 12, frequency of vasomotor symptoms decreased comparably in all groups, and at weeks 4 and 12, the decrease in frequency of symptoms was statistically equivalent for estradiol acetate and conjugated estrogens. Severity of vasomotor symptoms also improved comparably for all groups, with least squares mean decreases of 1.05 for estradiol acetate, 1.34 for estradiol, and 1.17 for conjugated estrogens at week 12. Urogenital symptoms and vaginal signs showed similar improvement in all groups. Overall, the majority of adverse events were mild or moderate and consistent with estrogen therapy. CONCLUSION: Estradiol acetate 0.9 mg was comparable to 1 mg of estradiol and 0.625 mg of conjugated equine estrogens in reducing the number and severity of vasomotor and urogenital symptoms in postmenopausal women. Oral estradiol acetate was well tolerated.