Stress Testing the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Novel Use of In Situ Simulation to Identify and Mitigate Latent Safety Threats During Acute Airway Management.

INTRODUCTION: Although uncommon, cardiac arrests in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) are often catastrophic and likely to increase with rising case complexity. In situ simulation (ISS) has been used to identify latent safety threats (LSTs) in inpatient units but has not yet been studied in the CCL. METHODS: Three Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles leveraging ISS were conducted focused on acute airway management. Data collected through debriefs focused on (1) airway management, (2) equipment availability, and (3) interdepartmental communication. The LSTs were subcategorized and plotted on the Survey Analysis for Evaluating Risk (SAFER)-Matrix. A SAFER score was calculated based on quantifying the likelihood of harm, scope, and the number of times a threat was identified during simulation. Time to definitive airway was collected as a secondary measure. Interventions were developed using cause and effect and driver diagrams between PDSA cycles. RESULTS: Eleven total simulations through 3 PDSA cycles were conducted between January and December 2021 (5 in PDSA 1, 4 in PDSA 2, and 2 in PDSA 3). One hundred one LSTs were identified with 14 total subcategories. The mean SAFER score decreased from 5.37 in PDSA 1, to 2.96 in PDSA 2, and to 1.00 in PDSA 3. Bivariate regression analysis showed a decrease in SAFER score of 2.19 for every PDSA cycle ( P = 0.011). Ordinary least squares regression had a decrease of 1.65 in airway-related threats every PDSA cycle ( P < 0.01) as well as an increase in intubation time of 35.0 seconds for every 1-unit increase in communication threat identified ( P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: This study successfully leveraged ISS and existing quality improvement initiatives in the CCL, resulting in a decrease in airway-related threats as measured through simulation.

The Development of an Assessment Rubric for the Core and Contingency Team Interaction Among Rapid Response Teams.

INTRODUCTION: Teamwork training is critical in the development of high-functioning rapid response teams (RRT). Rapid response teams involve interactions between a patient's core care team and a hospital contingency team, which can lead to disorganized and unsafe resuscitations, largely due to problems with communication and information dissemination. An extensive literature search found no assessment tools specific to the unique communicative challenges of an RRT, and thus, this study sought to develop an assessment rubric validated for training RRTs. METHODS: This study elucidates the development, implementation, and testing of an RRT rubric based on Kane's framework for validating testing instruments. Twenty-four inpatient code teams underwent team training using a Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) didactic, an online module on the TeamSTEPPS RRT program, and a subsequent presimulation and postsimulation experience. Two raters were randomized to give a bedside assessment for each team using the proposed RRT rubric. Simulation scores were assessed with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Interrater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. These analyses were then used to argue Kane's scoring, generalization, and extrapolation inferences. RESULTS: All teams significantly improved from the presimulation to postsimulation scenarios across all TeamSTEPPS domains. Content validity was obtained from 5 resuscitation experts with a scale-level content validity index of 0.9, with individual content validity index of 0.8 to 1.0. Intraclass correlation coefficient for "pre" scores were 0.856 (n = 24, P < 0.001), "post" scores of 0.738 (n = 24, P < 0.001), and a total of 0.890 (n = 48, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The authors argue for the validity of a new RRT rubric based off Kane's framework, with a specific focus on teamwork training to improve coordination and function of core and contingency teams. A follow-up study with longitudinal data along with external validation of this rubric is needed.

The Addition of High-Technology Into the Stop the Bleed Program Among School Personnel Improves Short-Term Skill Application, Not Long-Term Retention.

INTRODUCTION: The Stop the Bleed (STB) program trains the general public on identifying and treating life-threatening bleeding. Data on efficacy and retention of skills taught through this program are limited, with the role of high-technology modalities to augment the program, such as simulation and feedback devices, untested. METHODS: A convenience sample of 66 school personnel participated in an open-label observational study from January to August 2019. The control group received the standard bleeding control course, while the intervention group received the bleeding control course with addition of a simulation and a feedback device for wound packing. Assessment was performed by STB instructors using performance metrics from prior studies as well as a feedback device. Retention testing was performed 2 to 8 months after intervention. The study was approved by the hospital's institutional review board. RESULTS: The intervention group performed better than the control group on correct tourniquet application [90.3% vs. 71.0%; odds ratio (OR) = 11.28; P = 0.015; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.86 to 104.67] wound packing scores (59.5% vs. 29.6%; OR = 0.33; P = 0.007; 95% CI = 9.36 to 56.00) and were more likely to assess their safety (OR = 5.49; P = 0.034; 95% CI = 1.28 to 27.66), and reported higher comfort scores on stepping into an emergency scenario (OR = 11.19; P = 0.004; 95% CI = 2.51 to 63.11), wound packing (OR = 5.16; P = 0.025; 95% CI = 1.35 to 22.46), and using a tourniquet (OR = 11.41; P = 0.003; 95% CI = 2.57 to 67.59). Thirty-one participants (46.9%) were assessed again at retention 2 to 8 months later where scores for tourniquet placement and wound packing were not significantly different in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Augmenting STB with simulation and feedback improved both self-reported comfort level and skill set of participants, but the retention of skills was poor in both groups.

A Microdebriefing Crisis Resource Management Program for Simulated Pediatric Resuscitation in a Community Hospital: A Feasibility Study.

INTRODUCTION: Crisis Resource Management (CRM) is a team training tool used in healthcare to enhance team performance and improve patient safety. Our program intends to determine the feasibility of high-fidelity simulation for teaching CRM to an interprofessional team in a community hospital and whether a microdebriefing intervention can improve performance during simulated pediatric resuscitation. METHODS: We conducted a single-center prospective interventional study with 24 teams drawn from 4 departments. The program was divided into an initial assessment simulation case (pre), a 40-minute microdebriefing intervention, and a final assessment simulation case (post). Post and pre results were analyzed for each team using t tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Primary outcome measures included (a) completion of program, (b) percent enrollment, (c) participant reaction, and (d) support of continued programs on completion. Secondary outcomes included (a) change in teamwork performance, measured by the Clinical Teamwork Scale; (b) change in time to initiation of chest compressions and defibrillation; and (c) pediatric advanced life support adherence, measured by the Clinical Performance Tool. RESULTS: We successfully completed a large-scale training program with high enrollment. Twenty-four teams with 162 participants improved in Clinical Teamwork Scale scores (42.8%-57.5%, P < 0.001), Clinical Performance Tool scores (61.7%-72.1%, P < 0.001), and time to cardiopulmonary resuscitation initiation (70.6-34.3 seconds, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our center ran a well-attended, well-received interprofessional program in a community hospital site demonstrating that teaching CRM skills can improve simulated team performance in a diverse experienced cohort.