On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity is a Predictor of Adverse Events in Peripheral Artery Disease Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Angioplasty.

OBJECTIVES: Few data are available on the association between a different entity of platelet inhibition on antiplatelet treatment and clinical outcomes in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the degree of on-treatment platelet reactivity, and its association with ischaemic and haemorrhagic adverse events at follow up in PAD patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). METHODS: In this observational, prospective, single centre study, 177 consecutive patients with PAD undergoing PTA were enrolled, and treated with dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor. Platelet function was assessed on blood samples obtained within 24 h from PTA by light transmission aggregometry (LTA) using arachidonic acid (AA) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) as agonists of platelet aggregation. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined by LTA ≥ 20% if induced by AA, and LTA ≥ 70% if induced by ADP. Follow up was performed to record outcomes (death, major amputation, target vessel re-intervention, acute myocardial infarction and/or myocardial revascularisation, stroke/TIA, and bleeding). RESULTS: HPR by AA and HPR by ADP were found in 45% and 32% of patients, respectively. During follow up (median duration 23 months) 23 deaths (13%) were recorded; 27 patients (17.5%) underwent target limb revascularisation (TLR), two (1.3%) amputation, and six (3.9%) myocardial revascularisation. Twenty-four patients (15.6%) experienced minor bleeding. On multivariable analysis, HPR by AA and HPR by ADP were independent predictors of death [HR 3.8 (1.2-11.7), p = .023 and HR 4.8 (1.6-14.5), p = .006, respectively]. The median value of LTA by ADP was significantly lower in patients with bleeding complications than in those without [26.5% (22-39.2) vs. 62% (44.5-74), p < .001). LTA by ADP ≤ 41% was independently associated with bleeding HR 14.6 (2.6-24.0), p = .001] on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In this study a high prevalence of on-clopidogrel and aspirin high platelet reactivity was found, which was significantly associated with the risk of death. Conversely, a low on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity was associated with a higher risk of bleeding. These results document that the entity of platelet inhibition is associated with both thrombotic and bleeding complications in PAD patients.

Role of vascular ultrasound scanning in repeated trans-radial coronary artery intervention (prospective randomized study).

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to detect if pre-procedure vascular ultrasound scanning (VUS) of radial arteries (RAs) can increase the radial access success (RAS) rate and/or reduce the vascular access time (VAT), by guiding the choice of the proper access site for repeated trans-radial interventions (TRIs). BACKGROUND: Currently, repeated-TRIs are encountered more frequently in most of the cath. labs. However, structural changes of the RAs after TRA may hinder it is usage for repeated-TRI. VUS is the most accurate noninvasive test for assessing RAs, nonetheless, its role in the setting of repeated-TRIs has not been studied before. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We randomly assigned 300 patients undergoing repeated-TRI, to either planning the vascular access site based upon the result of VUS that was performed pre-procedural (group A, 150 patients) or to be left to the operator's discretion (group B, 150 patients). RESULTS: In group A (143/145 [98.6%]), RAS rate was only numerically higher than group B (143/150 [95.3%]), P = 0.08. There was a statistically significant differences between both groups in VAT [(1.25 ± 0.17 min), vs. (4.95 ± 0.87 min) for group A and B, respectively, P = 0.02] and in procedure duration [(37.2 ± 19.8 min) vs. (51.8 ± 18.6 min) for group A and B, respectively, P = 0.04]. RA spasm was more common in group B [18% (27/150)] than group A [2% (3/145)], P = 0.001. CONCLUSION: VUS of RAs prior to repeated-TRI is associated with significant reduction in VAT, procedure duration, RA spasm and a mild increase in the RAS rate.

Long-Term Primary Patency Rate After Nitinol Self-Expandable Stents Implantation in Long, Totally Occluded Femoropopliteal (TASC II C & D) Lesions.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy for long femoropopliteal lesions using percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty or first-generation of peripheral stents has been associated with unacceptable one-year restenosis rates. However, with recent advances in equipment and techniques, a better primary patency rate is expected. This study was conducted to detect the long-term primary patency rate of nitinol self-expandable stents implanted in long, totally occluded femoropopliteal lesions TransAtlantic Inter-Society Census (TASC II type C & D), and determine the predictors of reocclusion or restenosis in the stented segments. METHODS: The demographics, clinical, anatomical, and procedural data of 213 patients with 240 de novo totally occluded femoropopliteal (TASC II type C & D) lesions treated with nitinol self-expandable stents were retrospectively analysed. Of these limbs, 159 (66.2%) presented with intermittent claudication, while 81 (33.8%) presented with critical limb ischaemia. The mean-time of follow-up was 36±22.6 months, (range: 6.3-106.2 months). Outcomes evaluated were, primary patency rate and predictors of reocclusion or restenosis in the stented segments. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 70.9±9.3 years, with male gender 66.2%. Mean pre-procedural ABI was 0.45±0.53. One-hundred-and-seventy-five (73%) lesions were TASC II type C, while 65 (27%) were type D lesions. The mean length of the lesions was 17.9±11.3mm. Procedure related complications occurred in 10 (4.1%) limbs. There was no periprocedural mortality. Reocclusion and restenosis were detected during follow-up in 45 and 30 limbs respectively, and all were re-treated by endovascular approach. None of the patients required major amputation. Primary patency rates were 81.4±1.1%, 77.7±1.9% and 74.4±2.8% at 12, 24, and 36 months respectively. Male gender, severe calcification, and TASC II D lesion were independent predictors for reocclusion, while predictors of restenosis were DM, smoking and TASC II D lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of long, totally occluded femoropopliteal (TASC II C & D) lesions with nitinol self-expandable stents is safe and is associated with highly acceptable long-term primary patency rates.

Comparison of Safety and Effectiveness Between Right Versus Left Radial Arterial Access in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Transradial approach (TRA) is now considered the standard of care in many centres for elective and primary percutaneous intervention (PCI). The use of the radial approach in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients has been associated with a significant reduction in major adverse cardiac events. However, it is still unclear if the side of radial access (right vs. left) has impact on safety and effectiveness of TRA in primary PCI. So this study was conducted to compare the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of right radial access (RRA) vs. left radial access (LRA) in the setting of primary PCI. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the data of 400 consecutive patients presenting to our institution with STEMI for whom primary PCIs were performed via RRA and LRA. RESULTS: Mean age of the whole studied population was 57±12.8 years, with male predominance (77.2%). There were 202 cases in the RRA group and 198 in the LRA group, with no significant difference in demographics and clinical characteristics for patients included in both groups. There was no significant difference in procedure success rate (97.5% for RRA vs. 98.4% for LRA; P=0.77). In addition, no significant difference between both approaches was observed in the contrast volume, number of catheters, fluoroscopy time (FT), needle-to-balloon time, post-procedure vascular complications, in hospital reinfarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or death. CONCLUSION: Right radial access and LRA are equally safe and effective in the setting of primary PCI. Both approaches have a high success rate and comparable needle-to-balloon time.

Comparison between ultrasound-guided compression and para-aneurysmal saline injection in the treatment of postcatheterization femoral artery pseudoaneurysms.

Management of postcatheterization femoral artery pseudoaneurysm (FAP) is problematic. Ultrasound-guided compression (UGC) is painful and cumbersome. Thrombin injection is costly and may cause thromboembolism. Ultrasound-guided para-aneurysmal saline injection (PASI) has been described but was never compared against other treatment methods of FAP. We aimed at comparing the success rate and complications of PASI versus UGC. We randomly assigned 80 patients with postcatheterization FAPs to either UGC (40 patients) or PASI (40 patients). We compared the 2 procedures regarding successful obliteration of the FAP, incidence of vasovagal attacks, procedure time, discontinuation of antiplatelet and/or anticoagulants, and the Doppler waveform in the ipsilateral pedal arteries at the end of the procedure. There was no significant difference between patients in both groups regarding clinical and vascular duplex data. The mean durations of UGC and PASI procedures were 58.14 ± 28.45 and 30.33 ± 8.56 minutes, respectively (p = 0.045). Vasovagal attacks were reported in 10 (25%) and 2 patients (5%) treated with UGC and PASI, respectively (p = 0.05). All patients in both groups had triphasic Doppler waveform in the infrapopliteal arteries before and after the procedure. The primary and final success rates were 75%, 92.5%, 87.5%, and 95% for UGC and PASI, respectively (p = 0.43). In successfully treated patients, there was no reperfusion of the FAP in the follow-up studies (days 1 and 7) in both groups. In conclusion, ultrasound-guided PASI is an effective method for the treatment of FAP. Compared with UGC, PASI is faster, less likely to cause vasovagal reactions, and can be more convenient to patients and physicians.

Value of duplex scanning in differentiating embolic from thrombotic arterial occlusion in acute limb ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Management of acute limb ischemia (ALI) is largely based on the etiology of arterial occlusion (embolic vs. thrombotic). To our knowledge, the ability of duplex scanning to differentiate embolic from thrombotic occlusion has not been previously reported. PURPOSE: To determine the ability of duplex scanning to differentiate embolic from thrombotic acute arterial occlusion. METHODS: We prospectively recruited 97 patients (50.3 ± 19.7 years; 55% males) with 107 nontraumatic ALI in native arteries. All patients underwent surgical revascularization. Preoperative duplex scan detected arterial occlusion in the following arteries: iliac (11), femoral (38), popliteal (38), infrapopliteal (3), subclavian (3), axillary (1), brachial (9), and forearm arteries (4). We measured the arterial diameters at the site of occlusion (d(occl)) and at the corresponding contralateral healthy side (d(CONTRA)). The difference (Δ) between the two diameters was calculated as d(OCCL)-d(CONTRA). Duplex scan was also used to assess the state of the arterial wall whether healthy or atherosclerotic and the presence of calcification or collaterals. According to surgical findings, limbs were classified into embolic (E group=55 limbs) and thrombotic (T group=52 limbs) groups. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable regarding age, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, atrial fibrillation, and time of presentation. The status of arterial wall at the site of occlusion and presence of calcification or collaterals were all similar in both groups. Δ in the E group was 0.95 ± 0.92 mm vs. -0.13 ± 1.02 mm in the T group (P<.001). A value of ≥ 0.5 mm for Δ had 85% sensitivity and 76% specificity for the diagnosis of embolic occlusion (CI 0.72-0.90, P<.001), whereas a value of less than -0.5 mm for Δ had 85% sensitivity and 76% specificity for thrombotic occlusion (CI 0.72-0.90, P<.001). CONCLUSION: In acute arterial occlusion, ≥ 0.5 mm dilatation or diminution in the occluded artery diameter is a useful duplex sign for diagnosing embolic or thrombotic occlusion, respectively.