Public Health Dashboards in Overdose Prevention: The Rhode Island Approach to Public Health Data Literacy, Partnerships, and Action.

As the field of public health rises to the demands of real-time surveillance and rapid data-sharing needs in a postpandemic world, it is time to examine our approaches to the dissemination and accessibility of such data. Distinct challenges exist when working to develop a shared public health language and narratives based on data. It requires that we assess our understanding of public health data literacy, revisit our approach to communication and engagement, and continuously evaluate our impact and relevance. Key stakeholders and cocreators are critical to this process and include people with lived experience, community organizations, governmental partners, and research institutions. In this viewpoint paper, we offer an instructive approach to the tools we used, assessed, and adapted across 3 unique overdose data dashboard projects in Rhode Island, United States. We are calling this model the "Rhode Island Approach to Public Health Data Literacy, Partnerships, and Action." This approach reflects the iterative lessons learned about the improvement of data dashboards through collaboration and strong partnerships across community members, state agencies, and an academic research team. We will highlight key tools and approaches that are accessible and engaging and allow developers and stakeholders to self-assess their goals for their data dashboards and evaluate engagement with these tools by their desired audiences and users.

Comprehensive testing and rapid dissemination of local drug supply surveillance data in Rhode Island.

BACKGROUND: The North American overdose crisis has continued at unprecedented rates with more than 100,000 overdose deaths estimated to have occurred in the United States in 2022. Regional variations in overdose rates signify differences in local drug supplies. State-level drug supply surveillance systems have been limited in their ability to document and communicate the rapidly changing drug supplies which can hinder harm reduction efforts at the community level. We sought to address by piloting a two-year, community-engaged local drug supply surveillance program in Rhode Island (RI). METHODS: The first set of samples (n = 125) were collected from May 2022 to January 2023 across RI and included used paraphernalia (e.g., cookers), refuse (e.g., baggies), and product. Samples were tested using comprehensive toxicology testing approaches via liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS). Results were disseminated to participants and the broader public across platforms. RESULTS: Fentanyl was detected in 67.2% of all samples tested. 39.2% (n = 49) of samples were expected to be fentanyl. Xylazine was detected in 41.6% of all samples-always in combination with fentanyl-and no samples were expected to contain xylazine. In expected stimulant samples (n = 39), 10% contained fentanyl and/or analogues as major substances and 30.8% contained trace amounts of fentanyl and/or analogues. In expected stimulant samples, 15.4% contained xylazine with fentanyl. No opioids or benzodiazepines were detected in expected hallucinogen or dissociative samples (n = 7). In expected benzodiazepine samples (n = 8), no opioids were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Our results describe part of the local drug supply in Rhode Island, including a presence of NPS and adulterants (e.g., designer benzodiazepines, xylazine). Importantly, our findings underscore the feasibility of developing a community-driven drug supply surveillance database. Expanding drug supply surveillance initiatives is imperative for improving the health and safety of people who use drugs and informing public health approaches to addressing the overdose crisis.

Using Timely Overdose Data to Address a Spike in Nonfatal Overdoses and Inform a Coordinated Community-Level Response in Rhode Island, 2019.

The Rhode Island Department of Health (RIDOH) uses emergency department data to monitor nonfatal opioid overdoses in Rhode Island. In April 2019, RIDOH detected an increase in nonfatal opioid overdoses in Woonsocket, Rhode Island, and sent an alert to state and local partners (eg, fire departments, emergency departments, faith leaders) with guidance on how to respond. To guide community-level, strategic response efforts, RIDOH analyzed surveillance data to identify overdose patterns, populations, and geographic areas most affected. During April-June 2019, nonfatal opioid overdoses in Woonsocket increased 463% (from 13 to 73) when compared with the previous 3 months. Because of the sustained increase in nonfatal opioid overdoses, RIDOH brought together community partners at a meeting in June 2019 to discuss RIDOH opioid overdose data and coordinate next steps. Data analyses were essential to framing the discussion and allowed community partners at the event to identify an unexpected increase in cocaine-involved nonfatal opioid overdoses in Woonsocket. Many patients with cocaine-involved nonfatal overdoses also had fentanyl in their system, and input from community partners suggested that many patients were unaware of using fentanyl. Community response actions included targeting harm reduction services (eg, distribution of naloxone, mobile needle exchange); deploying peer recovery support specialists to overdose hotspots to connect people to treatment and recovery resources; placing harm reduction messaging in high-traffic areas; and targeted social media messaging. After the meeting, nonfatal opioid overdoses returned to pre-outbreak levels. This case study provides an example of how timely opioid overdose data can be effectively used to detect a spike in nonfatal opioid overdoses and inform a strategic, community-level response.

Impact of State Regulations on Initial Opioid Prescribing Behavior in Rhode Island.

The opioid epidemic presents an urgent public health problem. Rhode Island has enacted comprehensive rules to address primary prevention of opioid overdose. This study evaluates the efficacy of those regulations in altering prescribing behavior, specifically regarding the initial prescription. Using data extracted from the Rhode Island Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP), before and after the publication of updated acute pain management regulations, we studied the rate of opioid prescribing using statistical process control (SPC) charts and found that the rate of prescribing unsafe doses of opioids, more than 30 morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) per day or more than 20 doses to opioid naïve patients, decreased significantly.