The effect of restored medial knee anatomy in total knee arthroplasty with the flexion first balancer technique on mid-flexion laxity and functional outcome.

BACKGROUND: The Flexion First Balancer (FFB) technique for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was developed to maintain the isometry of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) by restoring the medial anatomy of the knee. Inability to correct MCL isometry could hypothetically result in an increased mid-flexion laxity. The aim of the current study was to evaluate if the FFB technique results in improved functional outcome and less mid-flexion laxity compared to Measured Resection (MR). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed comparing 27 FFB patients with 28 MR patients. Groups were matched for age, gender, BMI and ASA classification. All patient received the cruciate retained type, Vanguard Complete Knee System (Biomet Orthopedics, Warsaw, IN, USA). Stress X-rays of the knee with 30 degrees of flexion were made to assess varus-valgus laxity. Furthermore, three tests were conducted to asses functional outcome: a 6 min walk test, a stair climb test and quadriceps peak force measurements. Mean follow-up was respectively 2.6 (SD 0.4) and 3.9 years (SD 0.2). RESULTS: The MR group showed a postoperative elevation in joint line in contrast to the FFB group, the mean difference between the two groups was 3 mm (p < 0.001). No differences in total laxity between the two groups was found. The FFB group showed a higher quadriceps peak force (1.67 (SD 0.55) N/BMI) in comparison with the MR group (1.38 (SD 0.48) N/BMI) (p < 0.05). All other outcome parameters were comparable between the two groups (p: n.s.). Correlation analysis showed a moderate negative correlation between joint line elevation and quadriceps peak force (r = - 0.29, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The FFB technique did not lead to less coronal laxity in the mid-flexion range compared to MR. Although peak quadriceps force was significantly higher for the FFB group no clinically relevant benefits could be identified for the patients with regards to functional outcome. Therefore, minor deviations in joint line seems to have no effect on functional outcome after TKA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN85351296. Registered 23 april 2021 - Retrospectively registered, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN85351296.

Flexion First Balancer: description of new technique in TKA to reproduce joint line and pre-disease mechanical alignment.

A considerable proportion of patients (19%) are dissatisfied after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Possible factors contributing to this dissatisfaction are decreased posterior condylar offset (PCO) with subsequent joint line elevation, leading to mid-flexion instability. Secondly, the pre-disease mechanical alignment is changed into a neutral alignment. The Flexion First Balancer was developed to avoid these problems. This technique aims to maintain MCL isometry by restoring medial PCO and medial joint line to its pre-disease level. Also, to reconstruct the pre-disease mechanical alignment by adjusting the distal femoral angle. In this study we provide a detailed technical overview of the Flexion First Balancer technique.

Adequate joint line restoration and good preliminary clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty using the Flexion First Balancer technique.

INTRODUCTION: Up to 20% of patients are dissatisfied after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Factors which could possibly contribute to this dissatisfaction are a decreased posterior condylar offset (PCO) and subsequent joint line elevation which leads to mid-flexion instability. The Flexion First Balancer (FFB) technique aims to adequately restore the medial PCO and thereby reconstruct the medial native joint line to its pre-disease height. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 59 patients operated using the FFB technique was analyzed and matched with a historic measured resection (MR) cohort of 59 patients. Groups were matched for age, gender, BMI and ASA classification. Joint line and PCO changes as well as patient reported outcome measurement scores (PROMs) were evaluated at one year [1.0 - 1.6] postoperatively. RESULTS: Radiographic evaluation revealed no changes in joint line height in the FFB group, whereas an elevation in joint line was seen in the MR group (p = 0.002). The PCO increased after surgery in both group without any statistically significant differences. Evaluation of PROMs found no differences between the two groups for total OKS and KOOS scores, nor in re-operation or complication rates. CONCLUSION: The FFB technique seems to be a safe technique to use in TKA and reconstructs the pre-disease joint line in contrast to the MR technique. The clinical outcomes were comparable between both groups.