Validation of virtual-reality-based simulations for endoscopic sinus surgery.

BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) simulators provide an alternative to real patients for practicing surgical skills but require validation to ensure accuracy. Here, we validate the use of a virtual reality sinus surgery simulator with haptic feedback for training in Otorhinolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery (OHNS). METHODS: Participants were recruited from final-year medical students, interns, resident medical officers (RMOs), OHNS registrars and consultants. All participants completed an online questionnaire after performing four separate simulation tasks. These were then used to assess face, content and construct validity. anova with post hoc correlation was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The following groups were compared: (i) medical students/interns, (ii) RMOs, (iii) registrars and (iv) consultants. Face validity results had a statistically significant (P < 0.05) difference between the consultant group and others, while there was no significant difference between medical student/intern and RMOs. Variability within groups was not significant. Content validity results based on consultant scoring and comments indicated that the simulations need further development in several areas to be effective for registrar-level teaching. However, students, interns and RMOs indicated that the simulations provide a useful tool for learning OHNS-related anatomy and as an introduction to ENT-specific procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The VR simulations have been validated for teaching sinus anatomy and nasendoscopy to medical students, interns and RMOs. However, they require further development before they can be regarded as a valid tool for more advanced surgical training.

A prospective, single-blind, randomised, crossover study comparing three nasal hygiene systems and corresponding patient preference for such devices.

OBJECTIVE: To assess subjective preference using three nasal hygiene systems: Stérimar Original(®), Emcur(®) and Sinus Rinse™. DESIGN: We used a prospective, single-blind, randomised, crossover study to compare three nasal hygiene systems: Stérimar Original, Emcur and Sinus Rinse. SUBJECTS: Eighteen adult volunteers were recruited and were asked to rate their experience over three days using three well-established nasal hygiene systems. A standard visual analogue scale was used to assess five criteria: (1) simplicity of instructions; (2) ease of use; (3) comfort; (4) perceived nasal clearance (effectiveness) and (5) single best overall system. RESULTS: Stérimar Original was found to have the easiest instructions to understand compared to the other two systems. There was no significant difference between Stérimar Original and Sinus Rinse with regards to ease of use but they were both significantly easier to use than Emcur (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the three systems when comparing the last three criteria. There was no alteration in preference when the cost of each treatment was disclosed to the subjects, and no significant side effects were reported. CONCLUSION: The instructions accompanying Stérimar Original appeared to be the easiest to understand, while Stérimar Original and Sinus Rinse were easier to use than Emcur.

Optimising outcomes in the management of spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea.

BACKGROUND: To describe our experience of the management of spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhoea in a large case series focusing on surgical approach, peri-operative management and outcomes; to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic CSF leak repairs. METHODOLOGY: Retrospective chart review was performed for all patients with spontaneous CSF rhinorrhoea managed from 2003 to 2011 at a tertiary referral centre. Data regarding demographics, presentation, site of leak, peri-operative management, surgical approach, body mass index (BMI), follow up and success rates was collated. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were identified: 9 male and 27 female with a mean age of 50.4 years. Eight patients had previous failed repairs in other units. Success rate after first surgery was 89 % and after second surgery was 100 %. Four patients had recurrences, 3 underwent successful revisions and the fourth had complete cessation of the leak after gastric bypass surgery and weight reduction. All failures were before 2004 prior to instigation of an anatomic three-layered repair with no further failures in the following 7 years. Mean follow up was 21.5 months. Mean body mass index was 34.0 kg/m2. Fifty percent of spontaneous leaks were from the cribriform plate, 22 % sphenoid, 14 % ethmoid and 14 % frontal sinus. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic CSF fistula closure has become the gold standard of care. In order to optimise the outcome, we recommend a multidisciplinary approach to manage the associated idiopathic intracranial hypertension and an anatomic three-layered closure technique for recalcitrant cases.

Surgical voice restoration after total laryngectomy: an overview.

Total laryngectomy is potentially a debilitative surgery resulting in compromise of some of the most basic functions of life including speech and swallowing. This may have a profound adverse effect on the patient's physical, functional, and emotional health, and may result in a decreased quality of life (QOL). Until the 1980s, total laryngectomy was regarded as a dreadful, but often, life-saving procedure for which there was little alternative, and was used as a last resort. At that time survival at any cost in terms of QOL was paramount and many laryngectomies were forced into an isolated life as a mute and dysphasic recluse. Most attempts at voice restoration produced inconsistent results and often techniques were laborious, expensive, and ineffective, particularly when carried out as a salvage procedure after failed radiotherapy. Progress in voice rehabilitation, following total laryngectomy, over the last 30 years, has made an enormous difference in the whole concept of the management of laryngeal cancers. Currently there are several options available for these patients, namely, esophageal speech, artificial larynx, and tracheoesophageal speech. The choice of speech rehabilitation varies from patient to patient, but tracheoesophageal voice has become the preferred method. This article provides a brief account of surgical voice restoration after total laryngectomy. Special emphasis has been given to the surgical technique, special considerations, complications, and the prevention / treatment of tracheoesophageal voice restoration.

The current role of tissue engineering in head and neck reconstruction.

Tissue engineering is an emerging field that has the potential to revolutionize the field of reconstructive surgery by providing off-the-shelf replacement products. The literature has become replete with tissue engineering studies, and the aim of this article is to review the contemporary application of tissue-engineered products. The use of tissue-engineered cartilage, bone and nerve in head and neck reconstruction is discussed.

Quality of life and outcomes research in head and neck cancer: a review of the state of the discipline and likely future directions.

Quality of life (QOL) is by definition a multi-dimensional global construct that has become an increasingly important outcome measure in cancer treatment. The impact of a head and neck cancer (HNC) diagnosis on the person and the consequences of its treatment cross multiple functional domains that have a clear and direct influence on one's post-treatment well-being and associated QOL. The evaluation of QOL and performance outcome in cancer is critical to optimal patient care, comprehensive evaluation of treatment alternatives, and the development of informed rehabilitation and patient education services. Despite the difficulties of going from concept to quantification of patient perceptions, the number of instruments available to measure QOL psychometrically has increased rapidly. Assessments can now be made in a variety of distinctive ways using both specific and generic measures. There is no gold-standard questionnaire and the choice is based on psychometric properties, research objectives and study design. QOL assessment has evolved over the years into an organised scientific discipline, such that useful insights can be obtained by a review of the current literature. However, more work needs to be done to improve the applicability and clinical utility of QOL assessment. Most importantly, QOL studies should be reported in such a way as to provide clinically meaningful data to physicians and surgeons, in order to link research to clinical practice. Further attention should be paid to the development of newer theoretical models, minimalist approaches, development of more sensitive and specific instruments and the effective use of modern technology to achieve this objective.

Perspectives on quality of life following total laryngectomy.

Quality of life (QOL) considerations are uniquely important in head and neck oncology outcomes research due to the multidimensional impact of these tumors and their treatment. The impact of a head and neck cancer diagnosis on the person and the consequences of its treatment cross multiple functional domains that have a clear and direct influence on one's post-treatment well-being and associated QOL. Total laryngectomy can result in significant alterations in the physical, psychological, social, and emotional domains with an ultimate influence on the individual's judgment of his or her own QOL. Loss of voice, altered swallowing and a permanent tracheostoma, together with the uncertainty of cure, have a profound effect on the patient's physical and psychological rehabilitation. The evaluation of QOL and performance outcome in laryngectomees remains critical to optimal patient care, comprehensive evaluation of treatment alternatives, and the development of informed rehabilitative services and patient education.

Needle-stick injuries in the National Health Service: a culture of silence.

Injury by contaminated sharp instruments and needles constitutes a major occupational hazard for healthcare workers. In a confidential survey at a district general hospital, 300 healthcare professionals were asked about their personal experience of needle-stick injury and their attitudes to reporting. 279 individuals responded, of whom 38% had experienced at least one needle-stick (mean 1.8) in the past year and 74% had sustained such an injury during their careers (mean 3.0). Although 80% of respondents were aware that such incidents should be notified, only 51% of those affected had reported all needle-stick injuries. Doctors were less likely to report than nurses, despite a higher liability to injury. This survey adds to evidence of a culture of silence pertaining to needle-stick injuries. The consequent risks to health, and the ethical and financial implications, remain uncertain.