Clinically isolated syndromes or clinically isolated patients? A patient and clinician perspective on the utility of CIS as a diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: The term "Clinically Isolated Syndrome" (CIS) was introduced to describe a first clinical neurologic episode suggestive of an inflammatory demyelinating CNS disorder. Thereafter, the risk of developing clinically definite multiple sclerosis ranges from 20% to 80%, depending on a number of prognostic factors. Although the concept of CIS has been an important component in improving our understanding of risk levels in Multiple Sclerosis and prognosis, communicating uncertainty in this context remains a challenge for both patients and their clinicians. We therefore wished to explore both the patients understanding of the concept of CIS and the subsequent impact of a diagnosis. We also explored the concept of CIS from the clinician's perspective. METHODS: The study uses a qualitative descriptive design involving both a semi-structured interview of patients with CIS as well as a short questionnaire sent to practising clinicians in the Republic of Ireland. Narrative data was coded onto themes. RESULTS: Thirty CIS patients were interviewed. The majority of patients understood the term "CIS" but not the link between CIS and MS. Two themes were identified: emotional reactions following CIS diagnosis; and terminology and communication. Confusion and anxiety among patients due to inconsistent communication of CIS was identified. Of the thirty-three clinicians surveyed, only thirty-nine per cent found the term "CIS" clinically useful. Eighteen per cent of clinicians diagnosed MS from the CIS case vignette provided. CONCLUSION: In the diagnosis of a first demyelinating event, use of the term "CIS" is confusing to patients and inconsistent among clinicians. We suggest that the term "CIS" be abandoned in favour of terminology that reflects both its pathogenesis and inherent risk of subsequent MS.