RESUMO
Stress fractures are a common and significant source of pain and burden that can require long periods of rest from physical activity to allow adequate healing. Specifically in athletes or those with physically demanding occupations, the prolonged period of rest and the potential for requiring surgical intervention in the case of poor or delayed healing can have devastating impacts on these individuals' careers and socioeconomic well-being. In this population, successful healing, in addition to a quicker healing time and a sooner return to activity, are important outcomes when faced with treating stress fractures. The use of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) to accelerate bone healing has been a topic of investigation, though little research has explored the use of LIPUS specifically in the physically active population. The purpose of this study was to review the existing literature on the use of LIPUS for stress fracture healing in the physically active population with the outcome of a quicker return to sport or physical duties. The PubMed and Embase databases were screened for relevant articles using defined Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. Two independent researchers screened articles using PICOS criteria for inclusion in the review. Data were independently extracted regarding study and population characteristics as well as outcome measures, including time to healing of fractures and time to return to sport or physical activity. Five studies were ultimately included in the systematic review. One study investigated the use of LIPUS in pediatric athletes with spondylolysis, while four studies investigated lower extremity stress fractures in adult populations. All reported the outcomes of either rate or time to healing and ability to return to sport or activity. One study found a statistically significant improvement in the rate of bone union in the intervention group undergoing LIPUS compared to the control. Two studies found a statistically significant decrease in the time to resolution of symptoms, allowing an earlier return to sport or physical duties. Two studies found no difference in the time to healing or success rate of healing between the LIPUS group and the control group. This review of the literature suggests that the use of LIPUS for the treatment of stress fractures in the athletic or physically active population has the potential to expedite the resolution of symptoms and return to activity. Due to the heterogeneity of the existing studies, more research is needed to definitively determine the most appropriate clinical application of LIPUS and its most effective ultrasound settings. Further research should be directed toward more controlled studies specifically investigating the athletic and physically active population.
RESUMO
Purpose of Review: Individuals with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) are at a much greater risk for developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to the general population. This review discusses dietary patterns as a means of addressing modifiable risk factors following TBI exposure. Evidence-based resources for practicing Physiatrists and Brain Injury Medicine specialists pertaining to nutrition education and counseling are also provided. Recent Findings: We examined Mediterranean, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension, plant-based, ketogenic, and intermittent fasting dietary patterns through publications of clinical trials and systematic reviews. While many reviews had significant positive findings, some were limited by generalizability. Summary: While there is extensive literature on the immediate nutrition goals in the inpatient setting following an acute TBI exposure, there is limited literature discussing the nature of diet and nutrition in the post-acute setting. Fortunately, most individuals with TBI exposure survive their initial injury and continue into the recovery phase. The scientific literature supports increased morbidity and mortality with chronic TBI exposure compared to matched counterparts, most notably with CVD. A diet rich in fiber and nutrients but limited in added sugars, saturated fats, and excess calories would likely have the greatest cardiovascular and related neurologic protection. Future studies are needed to assess the specific impact of dietary interventions in the chronic phase of brain injury recovery.
RESUMO
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an increasingly recognized diagnosis with significant, and often costly, associated consequences. Yet, despite their increased recognition, TBIs remain underdiagnosed. This issue is especially prominent in the context of mild TBI (mTBI), where there often exists little to no objective evidence of brain injury. In recent years, considerable effort has been made to better define and interpret known objective markers of TBI, as well as identify and explore new ones. An area of particular interest has focused on research related to blood-based biomarkers of TBI. Advancements in our understanding of TBI-related biomarkers can make it possible to characterize the severity of TBI with greater accuracy, improve our understanding of staging within both the injury process and the recovery process, and help us develop quantifiable metrics representative of reversal and recovery from a brain injury following trauma. Proteomic and non-proteomic blood-based biomarkers are being studied extensively and have shown promise for these purposes. Developments in this realm have significant implications not only for clinical care but also for legislation, as well as civil and criminal litigation. Despite their substantial potential, most of these biomarkers are not yet ready for use within the clinical setting, and therefore, are not appropriate for use within the legal or policy-making systems at this time. Given that existing standardization for the accurate and reliable use of TBI biomarkers is currently insufficient for use within either the clinical or legal realms, such data can be vulnerable to misuse and can even result in the abuse of the legal system for unwarranted gain. Courts will need to carefully evaluate the information presented in their role as gatekeepers of the admissibility of scientific evidence within the legal process. Ultimately, the development of biomarkers should lead to improved clinical care following TBI exposure, coherent and informed laws surrounding TBI, and more accurate and just results in litigation surrounding TBI-related sequelae.
