Cervical, Thoracic, and Spinopelvic Compensation After Proximal Junctional Kyphosis (PJK): Does Location of PJK Matter?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: Compensatory changes above a proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) have not been defined. Understanding these mechanisms may help determine optimal level selection when performing revision for PJK. This study investigates how varying PJK location changes proximal spinal alignment. METHODS: Patients were grouped by upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV): lower thoracic (LT; T8-L1) or upper thoracic (UT; T1-7). Alignment parameters were compared. Correlation analysis was performed between PJK magnitude and global/cervical alignment. RESULTS: A total of 369 patients were included; mean age of 63 years, body mass index 28, and 81% female, LT (n = 193) versus UT (n = 176). The rate of radiographic PJK was 49%, higher in the LT group (55% vs 42%, P = .01). The UT group displayed significant differences in all cervical radiographic parameters (P < .05) between PJK versus non-PJK patients, while the LT group displayed significant differences in T1S and C2-T3 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (CTS). In comparing UT versus LT patients, UT had more posterior global alignment (smaller TPA [T1 pelvic angle], SVA, and larger PT [pelvic tilt]) and larger anterior cervical alignment (greater cSVA [cervical SVA], T1S-CL [T1 slope-cervical lordosis] mismatch, CTS) compared to LT. Correlation analysis of PJK magnitude and location demonstrated a correlation with increases in CL, T1S, and CTS in the UT group. In the LT group, PT increased with PJK angle (r = 0.17) and no significant correlations were noted to SVA, cSVA, or T1S-CL. CONCLUSIONS: PJK location influences compensation mechanisms of the cervical and thoracic spine. LT PJK results in increased PT and CL with decreased CTS. UT PJK increases CL to counter increases in T1S with continued T1S-CL mismatch and elevated cSVA.

Understanding Thoracic Spine Morphology, Shape, and Proportionality.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe thoracic kyphosis (TK) in a normal asymptomatic population and to evaluate the association between TK magnitude and its shape. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Understanding spinal anatomy requires a three-dimensional appreciation of the spine's shape, morphology, and proportions. The customary definition of TK is the angle between T4 and T12. However, little is known on the actual shape of TK in adults. METHODS: Asymptomatic volunteers were recruited; demographic data along with full-body standing radiographs were recorded. Radiographic data such as T1-12 and T4-12 angles were collected. Maximum TK and vertebral orientation/tilt were also collected, in addition to cumulative TK and Centered Kyphosis at T7. The cohort was stratified by T1-12 value (<40°, 40°-60°, and>60°) and comparisons and regressions were performed afterward. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen subjects were included (average age 50.8 yrs, 81 female). Mean T1-12 kyphosis was 49.5°, mean T4-12 kyphosis 41.5°, and mean maximum TK was 52.6°. T1 was the most anteriorly tilted vertebra, L1 the most posteriorly tilted; T7 was horizontal, independently of T1-12 value or age. Cumulative kyphosis analysis revealed that the apex of kyphosis was located at T6-T7. Regression analysis predicting the value and the percentage of T1-7 both yielded T1-12 as a predictor (Adj. r = 0.32, Adj. r = 0.13). CONCLUSION: Changes in kyphosis distribution in an asymptomatic population suggest that TK is not a simple circle arc: with low TK, 2/3 of the kyphosis is located in the upper part and when TK increases, the distribution of kyphosis will be symmetric around T7. It is possible to predict the amount of kyphosis in the upper part using total kyphosis value. This could help estimate preoperative compensation and predict reciprocal change. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

The Amount of Proximal Lumbar Lordosis Is Related to Pelvic Incidence.

BACKGROUND: Given that the pelvis is the pedestal on which the spine lies, its morphology has been observed to be associated with specific sagittal spinal shapes and should therefore be taken into account when dealing with pathologic conditions of the spine. However, the exact relationship between the pelvic morphology and lumbar lordosis still remains poorly defined. We hypothesized that the shape of the lumbar lordosis and its relationship with the pelvis could be described using anatomic parameters, independently of posture. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the variation of lumbar segmental lordosis in an asymptomatic adult population? (2) Is there an association between increasing magnitude of pelvic incidence (PI) and segmental lordosis? (3) How does the position of the apex of lordosis change with increasing magnitude of PI value? METHODS: This retrospective study used data drawn from a longitudinally maintained database; between March 2014 and January 2015, 119 asymptomatic volunteers between 18 and 79 years old were enrolled in the study. Mean age was 51 years; there were 81 women and 38 men. Both segmental and cumulative lordosis were measured and used to describe the shape of the lumbar spine. We defined cumulative lordosis as the angle between L1 and S1, proximal lordosis as the angle between L1 and the superior endplate of L4, and distal lordosis as the angle between the superior endplates of L4 and S1. PI is defined as the angle between the line passing through the center of the femoral head and the center of the sacral endplate and a line perpendicular to the sacral endplate. Pearson's correlation was performed to analyze the relationship among PI, proximal and distal lordosis. Stratification by PI was performed (low, < 45°; average, 45°-60°; and high, > 60°) and the proportions of distal and proximal lordosis were then compared using an analysis of variance test. RESULTS: In the whole cohort, proximal lordosis accounted for 38% of total lordosis, whereas distal lordosis accounted for 62%. PI revealed a positive correlation with proximal lordosis (r = 0.546; p < 0.001). However, there was no correlation with distal lordosis (r = 0.087; p = 0.346). Stratification by PI showed that proximal lordosis increased across PI groups (16.6° [± 10] versus 21.6° [± 9] versus 30.1° [± 9]; p < 0.001), whereas distal lordosis remained relatively constant (34.8° [± 8] versus 36.7° [± 7] versus 35.9° [± 10]; p = 0.581). Apex position was overall more proximal as PI increased (r = -0.199; p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that PI influences only the proximal part of the lordosis, but not the distal part in an asymptomatic adult population. The proximal part of the lumbar spine had the most variability across individuals and appeared to accommodate to pelvic morphology (incidence). Further studies using a larger cohort size are encouraged not only to refine this relationship, but also to investigate the effect of restoration of normal lordotic shape of the lumbar spine on the functional outcomes after spinal fusion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings may be useful for surgical planning in an era of patient-specific care. The findings suggest that surgeons should aim for a patient-specific lumbar shape rather than simple global lordosis matched to the PI.