RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Brugada syndrome is an arrhythmogenic disease characterized by an ECG pattern of ST-segment elevation in the right precordial leads and an increase risk of sudden cardiac death. Risk stratification for the life-threatening arrhythmic events in Brugada syndrome is not yet established. In the present study, we report our experience in patients with Brugada syndrome, following an ICD implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 12 patients (11 men, 1 woman) with a mean age of 46.5+/-11.8 were studied. At diagnosis, 7 patients had syncope of unknown origin, 2 patients were asymptomatic, 2 patients were survivors of cardiac arrest, and 1 had documented clinical VT requiring direct cardioversion for termination. Age was similar between the symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (46.6+/-13 vs. 46+/-2.8, respectively). Two patients reported a family history of sudden cardiac death. In 3 patients, spontaneous coved-type ECG was found at baseline. In 9 patients, a class I antiarrhythmic drug administration unmasked the characteristic type I ECG. In 4 patients (2 symptomatic with syncope at presentation and 2 asymptomatic), who underwent PES, sustained polymorphic VT or VF was induced. VF was induced by single extrastimuli in 2 symptomatic patients (1 from RV apex and 1 from RVOT). In 2 asymptomatic patients, VF was induced by two and triple ventricular extrastimli (1 from RV apex and 1 from RVOT). None of them experienced an event during follow-up. No significant difference was found between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (p=NS). The mean follow-up period for the entire study population was 27.83+/-11.25 months. During follow-up, 2 patients (one with prior cardiac arrest and another with syncope) had VF. Both of them had a type I ECG after provocation with a class I antiarrhythmic drug. None of them had undergone programmed ventricular stimulation. Five patients (41.7 %) had inappropriate ICD interventions during follow-up. The cause of inappropriate therapy was sinus tachycardia in 2 patients, AF in 2 patients and T wave oversensing in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: Knowledge about Brugada syndrome is steadily progressing but there are still unanswered issues dealing with the risk stratification and the management of patients.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Following RF ablation of reentrant supraventricular tachycardia, inappropriate sinus tachycardia may occur. Local parasympathetic denervation is a possible mechanism for these rhythm disturbances. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of sinus tachycardia and to determine the relation between endocardial lesions at different ablation sites and alterations in autonomic tone in several different groups of patients with supraventricular tachycardia, using techniques of heart rate variability analysis. METHODS: The subjects of this study were 75 patients (48 women, 27 men) with a mean age of 39.99 (SD = 13.39). They underwent RF ablation of AV nodal slow pathways (40 cases), posteroseptal APs (23 cases), left lateral and right free wall APs (12 cases) because of symptomatic tachycardias. The mean sinus rate and time domain (standard deviation of RR intervals and root mean square of differences of adjacent RR intervals) and frequency domain (low frequency, high frequency and low frequency/high frequency ratio) analyses of heart rate variability were obtained by use of 24 hour Holter monitoring before and 1 month after ablation compared with pre-ablation values. RESULTS: Analysis of 24 hour ambulatory Holter-monitors, performed 1 month after RF ablation, showed no significant changes in time and frequency domain parameters of heart rate variability in different groups. A significant increase in mean heart rate was noted after RF ablation at AV nodal slow pathway group and left freewall/right free wall accessory pathways group. Patients undergoing RF ablation of right or left posteroseptal accessory pathways had no significant increase in the mean heart rate. CONCLUSION: In summary, an increase in sinus tachycardia may be initiated by RF ablation of atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and right free wall or left free wall accessory pathways. This finding shows that the modifications of heart rate are not directly related to the posteroseptal region or to the accessory pathways.
