Residual cardiovascular risk reduction guided by lifetime benefit estimation in patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic disease: effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.

AIMS: To determine the (cost)-effectiveness of blood pressure lowering, lipid-lowering, and antithrombotic therapy guided by predicted lifetime benefit compared to risk factor levels in patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: For all patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic disease in the UCC-SMART cohort (1996-2018; n = 7697) two treatment strategies were compared. The lifetime benefit-guided strategy was based on individual estimation of gain in cardiovascular disease (CVD)-free life with the SMART-REACH model. In the risk factor-based strategy, all patients were treated the following: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) < 1.8 mmol/L, systolic blood pressure <140 mmHg, and antithrombotic medication. Outcomes were evaluated for the total cohort using a microsimulation model. Effectiveness was evaluated as total gain in CVD-free life and events avoided, cost-effectiveness as incremental cost-effectivity ratio (ICER). In comparison to baseline treatment, treatment according to lifetime benefit would lead to an increase of 24 243 CVD-free life years [95% confidence interval (CI) 19 980-29 909] and would avoid 940 (95% CI 742-1140) events in the next 10 years. For risk-factor based treatment, this would be an increase of 18 564 CVD-free life years (95% CI 14 225-20 456) and decrease of 857 (95% CI 661-1057) events. The ICER of lifetime benefit-based treatment with a treatment threshold of ≥1 year additional CVD-free life per therapy was €15 092/QALY gained and of risk factor-based treatment €9933/QALY gained. In a direct comparison, lifetime benefit-based treatment compared to risk factor-based treatment results in 1871 additional QALYs for the price of €36 538/QALY gained. CONCLUSION: Residual risk reduction guided by lifetime benefit estimation results in more CVD-free life years and more CVD events avoided compared to the conventional risk factor-based strategy. Lifetime benefit-based treatment is an effective and potentially cost-effective strategy for reducing residual CVD risk in patients with clinical manifest vascular disease.

Efficacy of host-dendritic cell vaccinations with or without minor histocompatibility antigen loading, combined with donor lymphocyte infusion in multiple myeloma patients.

Donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) can induce durable remissions in multiple myeloma (MM) patients, but this occurs rather infrequently. As the graft-versus-tumor (GvT) effect of DLI depends on the presence of host-dendritic cells (DCs), we tested in a phase I/II trial whether the efficacy of DLI could be improved by simultaneous vaccination with host-DCs. We also analyzed the possibility of further improving the GvT effect by loading the DCs with peptides of mismatched hematopoietic cell-specific minor histocompatibility antigens (mHags). Fifteen MM patients not responding to a first DLI were included. Eleven patients could be treated with a second equivalent dose DLI combined with DC vaccinations, generated from host monocytes (moDC). For four patients, the DC products did not meet the quality criteria. In four of the treated patients the DCs were loaded with host mHag peptides. Toxicity was limited and no acute GvHD occurred. Most patients developed objective anti-host T-cell responses and in one patient a distinct mHag-specific T-cell response accompanied a temporary clinical response. These findings confirm that DLI combined with host-DC vaccination, either unloaded or loaded with mHag peptides, is feasible, safe and capable of inducing host-specific T-cell responses. The limited clinical effects may be improved by developing more immunogenic DC products or by combining this therapy with immune potentiating modalities like checkpoint inhibitors.

The impact of circulating suppressor cells in multiple myeloma patients on clinical outcome of DLIs.

Allo-SCT followed by DLIs can establish long-term remissions in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. In many patients, however, the immunotherapeutic graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect is moderate and not sustained, implying that immune suppression is mediated, among other factors, by regulatory T cells (Tregs) or myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Towards a better understanding and, eventually, manipulation of the immune-regulatory mechanisms in transplanted MM patients, we retrospectively sought a correlation between DLI outcome and circulating CD14(+) MDSCs, CD14(-) MDSCs and Tregs in 53 MM patients before their first DLI. We found significantly elevated frequencies of highly suppressive CD14(+) MDSCs, CD14(-) MDSCs and Tregs in pre-DLI samples from patients. Higher frequencies of Tregs, but not of MDSCs, were significantly associated with non-responsiveness to DLI. Furthermore, a lower frequency of Tregs predicted the development of chronic GVHD, which, in turn, displayed a high association with GVT. Elevated Treg frequencies before DLI were also associated with significantly shorter PFS and OS. Hence, our data reinforce the idea of active suppression of antitumor responses by Tregs in MM patients and therefore suggest that targeting patient Tregs before DLI may improve outcome of DLI.