RESUMO
We performed transplant experiments with Louisiana irises to test the assumptions of three models of hybrid zone structure: the bounded hybrid superiority model, the mosaic model, and the tension zone model. Rhizomes of Iris fulva, I. hexagona, and F1 and F2 hybrids were planted at four sites in southeastern Louisiana in 1994. Wild irises grew at all four sites, but differed in genotypic composition among sites. The sites were characterized by (1) pure I. fulva plants; (2) I. fulva-like hybrids; (3) I. hexagona-like hybrids; and (4) pure I. hexagona plants. The sites differed significantly in light availability, soil moisture and chemical composition, and vegetation. Survival of transplants was high in all sites and did not differ significantly among plant classes. Iris hexagona produced significantly more leaf material than I. fulva at the I. hexagona and I. hexagona hybrid sites. The two species did not differ in leaf production at the I. fulva and I. fulva hybrid sites. Leaf production by both classes of hybrid was as great as, or significantly greater than, both parental classes in all sites. Iris hexagona rhizomes gained mass in the I. hexagona and I. hexagona hybrid sites, but lost mass in the I. fulva and I. fulva hybrid sites. Iris fulva rhizomes lost mass in all sites. There were no significant differences in rhizome growth among classes at the I. fulva site. At all other sites, F1 rhizomes grew significantly more than all other classes except for I. hexagona at the I. hexagona hybrid site. There were no significant differences among classes in the production of new ramets. Overall blooming frequencies were 30% for I. fulva, 10% for F1 s, 3% for F2 s, and 0.7% for I. hexagona. Blooming frequency did not differ among sites for I. fulva, but significantly more F1 s bloomed at the I. hexagona site than at the I. fulva site. These results are inconsistent with all three models of hybrid zone structure. They suggest that once rhizomes become established, hybrids can reproduce by clonal growth as successfully as parents in all habitats, and can outperform them in some habitats. Clonal reproduction may ensure the long-term survival of early generation hybrids and allow the establishment of introgressed populations, despite the fact that F1 hybrids are rarely produced in nature.
RESUMO
We studied the relationship between inflorescence size and male fitness in the andromonoecious lily Zigadenus paniculatus, using experimentally manipulated inflorescences to eliminate possible correlations between flower number, resource availability, and other floral traits. Allozyme markers were used to determine the siring success of large versus small plants in 14 arrays of plants, each array containing five large and five small plants. The inflorescence size of small plants was held constant both within and among arrays; the size of large plants was held constant within an array but was varied among arrays. Large plants sired more than half the seeds in 12 of the 14 arrays, and significantly more than half in six of these 12. However, in eight of the arrays, large plants sired significantly fewer seeds than expected on the basis of their size advantage. Furthermore, there was no significant relationship between relative size and relative siring success in comparisons among arrays. A maximum-likelihood model estimated that 28% of seeds were sired by imported pollen, with 95% confidence limits of 13% and 50%. Within these limits, high import rates tended to mask the relative success of large plants in several arrays. These results suggest that the evolution of inflorescence size in Z. paniculatus is at least partly driven by selection for increased male success, assuming genetic variation for flower number. However, the data also support a growing body of evidence that estimates of male fitness in plants can be highly variable. We discuss the sources of this variability and the possible effects of inflorescence design on the relationship between inflorescence size and fitness.
