Comparative study of non-contrast silent and time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiographic sequences in the evaluation of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula.

AIM: To compare the performance of two non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) sequences, silent MRA and time of flight (TOF) MRA, in the evaluation of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients with DAVF were enrolled and evaluated prospectively using silent MRA, TOF MRA, and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). The location, Cognard classification, arterial feeders, and venous drainage were evaluated. The therapeutic strategy and possible route were predicted on both silent and TOF MRA and these were compared with DSA during subsequent endovascular treatment. RESULTS: Sensitivity and accuracy of silent and TOF MRA for localisation (96.4% versus 96% and 96% versus 95%, respectively) and classification (96% versus 94% and 96% versus 93.5%, respectively) were high. Silent MRA showed higher sensitivity than TOF MRA for arterial feeders and draining veins (87% versus 79% and 81.6% versus 67%). This improved to a sensitivity of 96.4% and 89% when prominent feeders were considered. The sensitivity and accuracy were 92.6% and 85.8% for immediate draining veins. Both silent and TOF MRA were accurate for therapeutic planning (96% versus 85%), although silent MRA was more accurate. CONCLUSION: Silent MRA can more reliably evaluate the various angioarchtectural components of DAVF compared to TOF MRA.

Comparative Analysis of Volumetric High-Resolution Heavily T2-Weighted MRI and Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA in the Evaluation of Spinal Vascular Malformations.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Volumetric high-resolution heavily T2-weighted imaging or time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRA is used in the detection and characterization of spinal vascular malformations, though inherent trade-offs can affect their overall sensitivity and accuracy. We compared the efficacy of volumetric high-resolution heavily T2-weighted and time-resolved contrast-enhanced images in spinal vascular malformation diagnosis and feeder characterization and assessed whether a combined evaluation improved the overall accuracy of diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with spinal vascular malformations (spinal dural arteriovenous fistula, spinal cord arteriovenous malformation, and perimedullary arteriovenous fistula) were prospectively enrolled. MR images were separately analyzed by 2 neuroradiologists blinded to the final diagnosis. RESULTS: Both sequences demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 93.5% accuracy for the detection of spinal vascular malformations. Volumetric high-resolution heavily T2-weighted imaging was superior to time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR imaging for identification of spinal cord arteriovenous malformations (100% versus 90% sensitivity and 96.7% versus 93.5% accuracy), however, for the diagnosis of perimedullary arteriovenous fistula, time resolved contrast enhanced MRI was found to perform better than the volumetric T2 sequence (80% versus 60% sensitivity and 96.7% versus 93.5% accuracy). Both sequences showed equal sensitivity (100%) and accuracy (87%) for spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. Combined evaluation improved the overall accuracy across all types of spinal vascular malformation. Volumetric high-resolution heavily T2-weighted imaging was superior or equal to time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR imaging for feeder identification of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas for both observers (90.9% and 72.7% versus 72.7%), which improved to 90.9% when the sequences were combined. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR imaging performed better for major and total feeder identification of spinal cord arteriovenous malformation (80% versus 60%) and perimedullary arteriovenous fistula (80% versus 60%-80%). CONCLUSIONS: Combined volumetric high-resolution heavily T2-weighted imaging and time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR imaging can improve the sensitivity and accuracy of spinal vascular malformation diagnosis, classification, and feeder characterization.