[Hormone anti-müllérienne (AMH) en pédiatrie : établissement de valeurs de référence avec le dosage de l'AMH Fujirebio® Lumipulse G et comparaison avec le dosage Roche® Elecsys sur les mêmes échantillons pédiatriques]. / Anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) in pediatrics: establishment of reference values with the Fujirebio® Lumipulse G AMH assay and comparison with Roche® Elecsys assay on the same pediatric samples.

We performed a method comparison between the Fujirebio® Lumipulse G AMH assay and the Roche® Elecsys AMH assay using the same pediatric samples. We described full pediatric gender and age-specific reference ranges for AMH using the Fujirebio® AMH assay on the Lumipulse G 600 II. The study was performed on 281 plasma samples collected in tubes with lithium heparin. The samples were from patients (135 males and 146 females) aged from 3 days to 22 years collected at the University Hospital Center of Tours. The Fujirebio® Lumipulse method showed excellent correlation with Roche® Elecsys but had a significant proportional positive bias. The data were used to propose pediatric reference values adapted to the Fujirebio® method. Our study described full pediatric gender and age-related reference ranges for AMH using the Fujirebio® AMH assay on the Lumipulse G600II. The delineation between normal male and female AMH concentrations make them valuable clinical tools for the monitoring of pediatric sexual and reproductive development from early childhood through the pubertal transition into adulthood.

Insulin: Know what your immunoassay detects. Evaluation of two new immunoassays.

BACKGROUND: Insulin is essential for glycemic regulation but diseases can cause a default or an excess of insulin secretion leading to dysregulated glycemia. Hence, measurement of insulinemia is useful to investigate hypoglycemia, determine the pathogenesis of diabetes and evaluate ß-cell function. Thus, diabetic patients need supplementation with recombinant human insulin and/or insulin analogues. Analogues have primary sequences different from native human insulin and may not be detected by some immunoassays. The objective of our study was to evaluate new insulin immunoassays by determining their ability to detect different types of human insulin or analogues. METHODS: This study compared the reactivity of two new insulin immunoassays with five well-established immunoassays on ten commercial insulins. We also measured insulin in blood samples from diabetic or pancreas transplant patients with known treatment. RESULTS: Contrary to recombinant human insulin, there were differences in the specificity to insulin analogues. We distinguished three immunoassay categories: those recognizing all types of insulin such as the non-specific BI-INS-IRMA®, Architect® and Access® immunoassays; those recognizing human insulin only (Cobas®); and those recognizing human insulin and analogues in variable proportions (Liaison XL®, iFlash® and Maglumi®). CONCLUSION: An accurate biological interpretation of insulinemia relies on knowledge of the specificity of the immunoassay used.