Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine ; 15(2): 185-189, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38957766

RESUMO

Background: Spondylodiscitis (SD) is an inflammatory condition affecting the intervertebral discs and adjacent structures, often leading to serious complications, including epidural abscesses. This study aimed to differentiate postoperative SD from spontaneous cases caused by osteoporotic defects and associated pathologies, evaluating the frequency of SD in spinal diseases at a single center. Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational study involving 25 patients was conducted, analyzing variations between postoperative revisions in SD patients and spontaneous SD due to concurrent pathology and osteoporotic defects. The effects of postoperative wound healing following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompressive hemilaminectomy with pedicle screws were also investigated. Ethical guidelines were strictly followed during the study, conducted from January 2023 to September 2023 at Moscow City Clinical Hospital No. 68, Demikhova V.P. Results: Among the 25 patients with spontaneous SD, 15 females and 10 males were included, with only two undergoing surgical revision. Predominant purulent inflammatory foci were observed at specific spinal levels, and demographics revealed prevalent comorbidities such as arterial hypertension (80%) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (60%). Postoperative complications included paravertebral abscesses and wound-related issues. Structural observations indicated vertebral destruction, joint gaps, and localized spinal canal narrowing, revealing complexities in SD cases. Conclusion: Surgical intervention remains crucial for addressing SD-related vertebral complications, while antimicrobial therapy tailored to specific pathogens is pivotal. Concurrent conditions necessitate comprehensive management, often involving cardiological interventions. Postoperatively, a combined approach of conservative therapy and calcium phosphate adjuncts is recommended, especially considering the observed low bone density, aiming to optimize patient recovery and spinal stability.

6.
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine ; 15(1): 99-104, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38644921

RESUMO

Background: One of the most frequent etiologies for spinal surgery is unstable lumbar spondylolisthesis (ULS). To decompress affected structures while maintaining or restoring stability through fusion, surgeons utilize a variety of procedures. When paired with interbody fusion, posterior fusion is most applied, resulting in greater fusion rates. The two most popular techniques for implementing spinal fusion are posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). As a result, these two procedures have been assessed formally. Methodology: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent interbody fusion for lumbar stenosis through PLIF and minimally invasive (MI)-TLIF was performed. The patients were followed up for 24 months and fusion rates, Visual Analog Score (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) alongside the MacNab clinical outcome score, were assessed. The Bridwell interbody fusion grading system was used to evaluate fusion rates in computed tomography (CT). Results: Operations were performed in 60 cases where patients suffered from ULS. PLIF was performed on 33 patients (55%) (14 males and 19 females) and 27 patients (45%) (11 males and 16 females) who underwent MI-TLIF. In 87% of our respective cohort, either the L4-5 or the L5-S1 level was operated on. Overall fusion rates were comparable between the two groups; however, the TLIF group improved more in terms of VAS, ODI, and MacNab scores. On average, MI-TLIF surgery was longer and resulted in reduced blood loss. MI-TLIF patients were more mobile than PLIF patients postoperatively. Conclusion: With well-established adequate results in the literature, TLIF offers benefits over other methods used for interbody lumbar fusion in ULS or other diseases of the spine. However, MI-TLIF may procure more advantageous for patients if MI methods are implemented. In this instance, TLIF outperformed PLIF due to shorter operating times, less blood loss, faster ODI recovery, better MacNab scores, and a greater decline in VAS pain ratings.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...