Validación de un nuevo modelo de simulación inorgánica para la anastomosis uretrovesical laparoscópica / Validation of a new artificial model for simulated training of a laparoscopic vesicourethral anastomosis

Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio es demostrar la validez de un modelo inorgánico de bajo coste para el aprendizaje y entrenamiento de la anastomosis uretrovesical laparoscópica. Materiales y métodos: En este estudio participaron alumnos que asistieron a alguna de las ediciones de los cursos monográficos sobre prostatectomía radical laparoscópica (PRL) celebrados durante el periodo de 2015 a 2017. Estos participantes se dividieron en 2 grupos de acuerdo con su experiencia previa en cirugía laparoscópica (CL). Las tareas que realizaron sobre el simulador inorgánico fueron la resección de la próstata, "tarea 1" y la anastomosis uretrovesical, "tarea 2". Una vez realizados estos ejercicios, los participantes del estudio completaron un cuestionario anónimo donde se recogieron sus datos demográficos y su nivel de experiencia en CL. Además, los asistentes realizaron una valoración de la capacidad didáctica del órgano sintético empleado, evaluando su utilidad como herramienta para la formación específica de PRL. Para demostrar la validación aparente y de contenidos los participantes mostraron su opinión acerca de la textura, la consistencia, la morfología y la similitud del órgano con el paciente real. La valoración se realizó según una escala de Likert de 5 puntos. Resultados: Los alumnos se distribuyeron en 2 grupos: 10 expertos (grupo E) y 12 noveles (grupo N). La única diferencia significativa entre las puntuación de noveles y de expertos fue respecto a la inclusión de esta herramienta en los programas de formación (grupo E = 5 puntos frente al grupo N = 4,4 ± 0,59, p = 0,024). Los expertos calificaron todas las cuestiones con mayores puntaciones que los noveles. En cuanto a la valoración general del modelo inorgánico, los participantes noveles dieron una calificación media de 8,00±0,91 puntos sobre 10, siendo superada por la valoración de los participantes del grupo de expertos, que dieron una puntuación media de 9,4 ± 0,51. Conclusión: Este modelo inorgánico ha demostrado poseer validez aparente, de contenidos y constructiva, además de ser una herramienta didáctica ideal para el aprendizaje y el entrenamiento de la resección prostática y de la anastomosis uretrovesical laparoscópica

Objective: The aim of this study is to prove the effectiveness of a low cost, artificial model for training of a laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis. Materials and methods: This study included urologists who attended specialised courses on laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) held during the period 2015 to 2017. They were divided into 2 groups according to their previous experience in laparoscopic surgery. The tasks performed on the artificial simulator were prostate resection, "task 1", and urethrovesical anastomosis, "task 2". Once these exercises were completed, the study participants filled in an anonymous questionnaire regarding their demographic data and experience level in laparoscopic surgery (LS). In addition, they gave their opinions about the didactic capacity of the artificial organ and evaluated its usefulness as a tool for LRP training. To demonstrate face and content validity, the participants judged the texture, consistency, morphology and evaluated its similarity to the real organ. The assessment was made with a five-point Likert scale. Results: The students were divided into 2 groups: 10 experts (Group E) and 12 novices (Group N). The only significant difference between the scores of novices and experts was regarding the inclusion of this tool in the training programs (Group E = 5 points versus group N = 4.4 ± 0.59, P = .024). The experts' group rated all the items with higher scores than the novices’ one. Regarding the general assessment of the simulation model, the novice participants gave an average score of 8.00 ± 0.91 points out of 10, while the experts’ group granted higher scores of 9.4 ± 0,51. Conclusion: This artificial model has shown to have an elevated face, content and construct validity, as well being an optimal didactic tool for training in the techniques of prostate resection and laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis

Validation of a new artificial model for simulated training of a laparoscopic vesicourethral anastomosis. / Validación de un nuevo modelo de simulación inorgánica para la anastomosis uretrovesical laparoscópica.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to prove the effectiveness of a low cost, artificial model for training of a laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included urologists who attended specialised courses on laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) held during the period 2015 to 2017. They were divided into 2 groups according to their previous experience in laparoscopic surgery. The tasks performed on the artificial simulator were prostate resection, "task 1", and urethrovesical anastomosis, "task 2". Once these exercises were completed, the study participants filled in an anonymous questionnaire regarding their demographic data and experience level in laparoscopic surgery (LS). In addition, they gave their opinions about the didactic capacity of the artificial organ and evaluated its usefulness as a tool for LRP training. To demonstrate face and content validity, the participants judged the texture, consistency, morphology and evaluated its similarity to the real organ. The assessment was made with a five-point Likert scale. RESULTS: The students were divided into 2groups: 10 experts (Group E) and 12 novices (Group N). The only significant difference between the scores of novices and experts was regarding the inclusion of this tool in the training programs (Group E=5 points versus group N=4.4±0.59, P=.024). The experts' group rated all the items with higher scores than the novices' one. Regarding the general assessment of the simulation model, the novice participants gave an average score of 8.00±0.91 points out of 10, while the experts' group granted higher scores of 9.4±0,51. CONCLUSION: This artificial model has shown to have an elevated face, content and construct validity, as well being an optimal didactic tool for training in the techniques of prostate resection and laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis.

Decomposition and analysis of laparoscopic suturing task using tool-motion analysis (TMA): improving the objective assessment.

PURPOSE: The laparoscopic suturing task is a complex procedure that requires objective assessment of surgical skills. Analysis of laparoscopic suturing task components was performed to improve current objective assessment tools. METHODS: Twelve subjects participated in this study as three groups of four surgeons (novices, intermediates and experts). A box-trainer and organic tissue were used to perform the experiment while tool movements were recorded with the augmented reality haptic system. All subjects were right-handed and developed a surgeon's knot. The laparoscopic suturing procedure was decomposed into four subtasks. Different objective metrics were applied during tool-motion analysis (TMA). Statistical analysis was performed, and results from three groups were compared using the Jonckheere-Terpstra test, considering significant differences when P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: Several first, second and fourth subtask metrics had significant differences between the three groups. Subtasks 1 and 2 had more significant differences in metrics than subtask 4. Almost all metrics showed superior task executions accomplished by experts (lower time, total path length and number of movements) compared with intermediates and novices. CONCLUSION: The most important subtasks during suture learning process are needle puncture and first knot. The TMA could be a useful objective assessment tool to discriminate surgical experience and could be used in the future to measure and certify surgical proficiency.