Relationship between the ABO blood group and COVID-19 susceptibility, severity and mortality in two cohorts of patients.

BACKGROUND: Several articles reported the existence of an association between ABO blood groups and COVID-19 susceptibility. Group A and group O individuals showed a higher and lower risk, respectively, of becoming infected. No association was observed between ABO groups and mortality. To verify this association, we performed a retrospective study of two cohorts of patients with different demographic and clinical characteristics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 854 regular blood donors were recruited for convalescent plasma donation after recovering from a mild COVID-19 infection, and a group of 965 patients more severely affected who were transfused during hospitalisation were also included. We also investigated the potential role of the different risk factors on patient outcome and death. To eliminate the confounding effect of risk factors on mortality, a propensity score analysis was performed. RESULTS: Blood group A and blood group O COVID-19 blood donors showed a higher and lower risk, respectively, for acquiring COVID-19. In contrast, this association was not found in the group of patients transfused during hospitalisation, probably due to the great differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between the two groups. Regarding severity, age was one of the most significant risk factors. ABO blood groups were also seen to represent important risk factors for COVID-19 severity and mortality. Mortality risk in group A individuals was significantly higher than in group O individuals (OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.22-2.51). DISCUSSION: The association between the ABO blood groups and the susceptibility to acquire COVID-19 infection was confirmed in the group of blood donors. ABO blood groups were also associated to COVID-19 severity and mortality in the group of patients transfused during hospitalisation. Therefore, blood groups A and O are two important factors to be considered when evaluating the prognosis of patients with COVID-19.

Recomendaciones del Grupo Catalán de Trombosis (Tromboc@t Working Group) para el tratamiento de los pacientes que reciben anticoagulantes orales directos / Tromboc@t Working Group recommendations for management in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants

Antecedentes y objetivos: En los últimos años los anticoagulantes orales directos (ACOD) se han convertido en una alternativa a los antagonistas de la vitamina K (AVK) para la prevención del ictus y embolia sistémica en pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular (FANV), así como para la prevención y tratamiento de la trombosis venosa profunda. Los ensayos clínicos han demostrado la no inferioridad y la potencial superioridad en comparación con la warfarina, lo cual permite ampliar las opciones de anticoagulación. En nuestro medio, las Unidades de Tratamiento Anticoagulante (UTA) y los Centros de Atención Primaria (CAP) son los encargados de la educación, seguimiento, control de adherencia y del manejo en situaciones especiales de los pacientes anticoagulados. Estas consideraciones han motivado la preparación del presente documento de consenso, que tiene como objetivo establecer recomendaciones que incorporen los hallazgos de la investigación científica a la práctica clínica para mejorar la calidad asistencial en el ámbito de la anticoagulación. Material y métodos: Un grupo de expertos del Grupo Catalán de Trombosis (TROMBOC@T) ha revisado la bibliografía publicada entre 2007 y 2016 para poder establecer recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia clínica. Resultados: Como resultado del proyecto se han establecido un conjunto de recomendaciones de carácter práctico que facilitarán el tratamiento, educación, seguimiento y manejo en situaciones especiales de los pacientes anticoagulados con ACOD. Conclusiones: El aumento progresivo del uso de los ACOD requiere establecer y homogeneizar las directrices de actuación clínica en el paciente anticoagulado con estos antitrombóticos tanto en las UTA como en los CAP

Background and objectives: In recent years, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) as well as for prevention and treatment of deep venous thrombosis. Pivotal trials have demonstrated non-inferiority and potential superiority compared to warfarin, which increases the options of anticoagulant treatment. In our setting, the Anticoagulant Treatment Units (ATUs) and Primary Care Centres (PCCs) play an important role in the education, follow-up, adherence control and management in special situations of anticoagulated patients. These considerations have motivated us to elaborate the present consensus document that aims to establish clear recommendations that incorporate the findings of scientific research into clinical practice to improve the quality of care in the field of anticoagulation. Material and methods: A group of experts from the Catalan Thrombosis Group (TROMBOC@T) reviewed all published literature from 2009 to 2016, in order to provide recommendations based on clinical evidence. Results: As a result of the project, a set of practical recommendations have been established that will facilitate treatment, education, follow-up and management in special situations of anticoagulated patients with ACODs. Conclusions: Progressive increase in the use of DOACs calls for measures to establish and homogenise clinical management guidelines for patients anticoagulated with DOACs in ATUs and PCCs

Tromboc@t Working Group recommendations for management in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants. / Recomendaciones del Grupo Catalán de Trombosis (Tromboc@t Working Group) para el tratamiento de los pacientes que reciben anticoagulantes orales directos.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In recent years, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) as well as for prevention and treatment of deep venous thrombosis. Pivotal trials have demonstrated non-inferiority and potential superiority compared to warfarin, which increases the options of anticoagulant treatment. In our setting, the Anticoagulant Treatment Units (ATUs) and Primary Care Centres (PCCs) play an important role in the education, follow-up, adherence control and management in special situations of anticoagulated patients. These considerations have motivated us to elaborate the present consensus document that aims to establish clear recommendations that incorporate the findings of scientific research into clinical practice to improve the quality of care in the field of anticoagulation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A group of experts from the Catalan Thrombosis Group (TROMBOC@T) reviewed all published literature from 2009 to 2016, in order to provide recommendations based on clinical evidence. RESULTS: As a result of the project, a set of practical recommendations have been established that will facilitate treatment, education, follow-up and management in special situations of anticoagulated patients with ACODs. CONCLUSIONS: Progressive increase in the use of DOACs calls for measures to establish and homogenise clinical management guidelines for patients anticoagulated with DOACs in ATUs and PCCs.

Cost of vitamin K antagonist anticoagulant treatment in patients with metallic prosthetic valve in mitral position.

BACKGROUND: The initiation of oral anticoagulation therapy after valve replacement surgery requires strict monitoring because these patients are at high risk for the development of thrombotic complications and present an increased risk of bleeding. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the total healthcare costs of oral anticoagulant treatment with vitamin K antagonists in patients with metallic prosthetic valves in the mitral position. METHODS: Data from clinical records were used in the study including international normalized ratio results, number of medical visits, type of anticoagulant, use of rescue medication and hospital admissions from related complications. The drug cost was calculated based on the official Spanish Ministry of Health price list. Monitoring expenses were included in the cost of the medical supplies used in the procedures. Hospitalization costs were calculated using the diagnosis-related group price for each case. RESULTS: We collected data from 151 patients receiving oral anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonist who were diagnosed with mitral prosthesis (n = 90), mitro-aortic prosthesis (n = 57), and mitral and tricuspid prosthesis (n = 4). The total direct healthcare cost was €15302.59, with a mean total cost per patient per year of €1558.15 (±2774.58) consisting of 44.38 (±42.30) for drug cost, €71.41 (±21.43) for international normalized ratio monitoring, €429.52 (±126.87) for medical visits, €26.31 (±28.38) for rescue medication and €986.53 (±2735.68) for related complications. CONCLUSION: Most direct healthcare costs associated with the sampled patients arose from the specialist-care monitoring required for treatment. Good monitoring is inversely related to direct healthcare costs.

Asociación entre enfermedad tromboembólica venosa y dislipidemia / Association between venous thrombosis and dyslipidemia

Fundamento y objetivo: La trombosis venosa y la trombosis arterial, a pesar de haber sido consideradas durante años como 2 entidades distintas, comparten ciertos factores de riesgo. La dislipidemia es una condición clínica con una prevalencia relativamente elevada en la población, que se ha asociado a un incremento del riesgo trombótico. Los lípidos y lipoproteínas modulan la expresión y/o función de factores trombóticos, fibrinolíticos y reológicos. Pacientes y método: Se ha desarrollado un estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo, comparativo y transversal en el que se ha incluido un grupo de 313 pacientes con enfermedad tromboembólica venosa (ETEV). Se recogieron los datos de filiación básica, factores de riesgo cardiovascular clásicos y complicaciones trombóticas. En todos los pacientes se estudió el perfil lipídico: colesterol total, colesterol unido a high density lipoproteins (HDL, «lipoproteínas de alta densidad»), colesterol unido a low density lipoproteins (LDL, «lipoproteínas de baja densidad») y triglicéridos. Resultados: La dislipidemia es un factor de riesgo para la ETEV, con una odds ratio (OR) de 3,87 (intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC 95%] 2,72-5,56; p < 0,0001). El 31% (n = 97) de los pacientes sufrió un episodio recurrente y el 23% (n = 72) desarrolló síndrome postrombótico. Los valores de colesterol HDL < 35 mg/dl y los de colesterol LDL > 180 mg/dl resultaron ser factores de riesgo para el desarrollo de trombosis recurrente, con una OR de 3,12 (IC 95% 1,35-7,74; p = 0,008) y de 2,35 (IC 95% 1,24-4,45; p = 0,008), respectivamente, y síndrome postrombótico: OR 3,44 (IC 95% 1,43-8,83; p = 0,005) y OR 2,35 (IC 95% 1,24-4,45; p = 0,008). Conclusiones: Existe una asociación entre la dislipidemia y la ETEV, siendo el riesgo de trombosis casi 4 veces mayor en individuos con esta enfermedad. Las alteraciones del perfil lipídico también están relacionadas con una mayor prevalencia de recurrencia y síndrome postrombótico (AU)

Background and objective: Venous and arterial thrombosis, despite being historically considered as distinct conditions, share certain risk factors. Dyslipidemia is a clinical condition with a relatively high prevalence in the population and has been associated with an increased thrombotic risk. Lipids and lipoproteins modulate the expression and/or function of thrombotic, fibrinolytic and rheological factors. Patients and method: We have developed a descriptive, retrospective, comparative, cross-sectional study including a group of 313 patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). We collected basic demographic data, cardiovascular risk factors and thrombotic complications. All patients were subjected to a lipid profile study with determination of total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol (cHDL), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (cLDL) and triglycerides. Results: The multivariable analysis showed that dyslipidemia was a risk factor for VTE (odds ratio [OR] 3.87, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.72-5.56; P < .0001). Of a total of 313 patients included in the study, 31% (n = 97) had a recurrent thrombotic event and 23% (n = 72) developed post-thrombotic syndrome. cHDL levels below 35 mg/dl and cLDL levels higher than 180 mg/dl represented risk factors for the development of recurrent thrombosis, OR 3.12 (95% CI 1.35-7.74; P = .008) and OR 2.35 (95% CI Background and objective: Venous and arterial thrombosis, despite being historically considered as distinct conditions, share certain risk factors. Dyslipidemia is a clinical condition with a relatively high prevalence in the population and has been associated with an increased thrombotic risk. Lipids and lipoproteins modulate the expression and/or function of thrombotic, fibrinolytic and rheological factors. Patients and method: We have developed a descriptive, retrospective, comparative, cross-sectional study including a group of 313 patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). We collected basic demographic data, cardiovascular risk factors and thrombotic complications. All patients were subjected to a lipid profile study with determination of total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol (cHDL), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (cLDL) and triglycerides. Results: The multivariable analysis showed that dyslipidemia was a risk factor for VTE (odds ratio [OR] 3.87, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.72-5.56; P < .0001). Of a total of 313 patients included in the study, 31% (n = 97) had a recurrent thrombotic event and 23% (n = 72) developed post-thrombotic syndrome. cHDL levels below 35 mg/dl and cLDL levels higher than 180 mg/dl represented risk factors for the development of recurrent thrombosis, OR 3.12 (95% CI 1.35-7.74; P = .008) and OR 2.35 (95% CI 1.24-4.45; P = .008), respectively, and post-thrombotic syndrome, OR 3.44 (95% CI 1.43-8.83; P = .005) and OR 2.35 (95% CI 1.24-4.45; P = .008). Conclusions: Our study confirmed the association between dyslipidemia and VTE and showed a risk of thrombosis nearly 4 times higher in individuals with this disease. In addition, alterations in the lipid profile were also related to a higher prevalence of thrombotic complications, recurrence and postthrombotic syndrome (AU)

Direct vitamin K antagonist anticoagulant treatment health care costs in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence suggesting that most thromboembolic complications could be prevented with adequate pharmacological anticoagulation. We estimated the direct health care costs of anticoagulant treatment with oral vitamin K antagonists in patients diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS: This observational study examined the clinical records of patients diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who received anticoagulant treatment with oral vitamin K antagonists. Data from clinical records were used in the study: international normalized ratio, number of monitoring visits, type of anticoagulant, hospital admissions from complications, and concomitant medication. Drug cost was calculated based on the official Spanish Ministry of Health price list. Monitoring expenses were included the cost of the medical supplies used in the procedures. Hospitalization costs were calculated using the Diagnosis Related Group price for each case. Hospital visits costs were calculated by one of four different scenarios, using either the invoice rates for the regional health care authority or cost per visit as established by analytical accounting methods. RESULTS: We collected data from 1,257 patients diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who were receiving oral anticoagulant therapy. Depending on the scheme used, the direct health care costs for these patients ranged from €423,695 - €1,436,038 per annum. The average cost per patient varied between €392 - €1,341, depending on the approach used. Patients with international normalized ratio values within the therapeutic range on 25% of their visits represented an average cost between €441.70 - €1,592. Those within the therapeutic range on 25%-50% of visits had associated costs of €512.37 - €1,703.91. When international normalized ratio values were within the therapeutic range on 50% - 75% of the visits, the costs ranged between €400.80- €1,375.74. The average cost was €305.23 - €1,049.84 when the values were within the therapeutic range for over 75% of visits. CONCLUSIONS: Most direct health care costs associated with the sampled patients arise from the specialist-care monitoring required for the treatment. Good monitoring is inversely related to direct health care costs.

[Association between venous thrombosis and dyslipidemia]. / Asociación entre enfermedad tromboembólica venosa y dislipidemia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Venous and arterial thrombosis, despite being historically considered as distinct conditions, share certain risk factors. Dyslipidemia is a clinical condition with a relatively high prevalence in the population and has been associated with an increased thrombotic risk. Lipids and lipoproteins modulate the expression and/or function of thrombotic, fibrinolytic and rheological factors. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We have developed a descriptive, retrospective, comparative, cross-sectional study including a group of 313 patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). We collected basic demographic data, cardiovascular risk factors and thrombotic complications. All patients were subjected to a lipid profile study with determination of total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol (cHDL), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (cLDL) and triglycerides. RESULTS: The multivariable analysis showed that dyslipidemia was a risk factor for VTE (odds ratio [OR] 3.87, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.72-5.56; P<.0001). Of a total of 313 patients included in the study, 31% (n=97) had a recurrent thrombotic event and 23% (n=72) developed post-thrombotic syndrome. cHDL levels below 35 mg/dl and cLDL levels higher than 180 mg/dl represented risk factors for the development of recurrent thrombosis, OR 3.12 (95% CI 1.35-7.74; P=.008) and OR 2.35 (95% CI 1.24-4.45; P=.008), respectively, and post-thrombotic syndrome, OR 3.44 (95% CI 1.43-8.83; P=.005) and OR 2.35 (95% CI 1.24-4.45; P=.008). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed the association between dyslipidemia and VTE and showed a risk of thrombosis nearly 4 times higher in individuals with this disease. In addition, alterations in the lipid profile were also related to a higher prevalence of thrombotic complications, recurrence and post-thrombotic syndrome.