A new comprehensive 12-segment approach to right ventricular systolic and diastolic functions by 2D speckle tracking echocardiography in healthy individuals.

BACKGROUND: 2D speckle tracking echocardiography (2DSTE) was proved to be accurate for the assessment of the RV function. However, normal values for RV strain refer mostly to 3- or 6-segment models, excluding the contribution of other RV walls to RV function. We analyze RV function by 2DSTE in a normal population, using parasternal two-(2C) and apical four-chamber (4C) RV views, and creating a new 12-segment model for a potential better definition of RV function. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 100 normals using 2DE and STE. We assessed the RV systolic function from regional strain (basal, mid, and apical), and at the level of each wall: lateral (LS), septal (SS), inferior (IS), and anterior (AS), and also global strain for 4C (4CGS), and 2C (2CGS). Global systolic strain rate (SRs) was measured from 2C and 4C views. Diastolic function was assessed from early (SRe) and late global strain rate (SRl), for both views. RESULTS: A total of 70 healthy individuals (48±15 years, 34 men) were suitable for concomitant 4C and 2CRV analysis. Feasibility of the STE analysis was 87.8%. We found significantly lower SS by comparison with LS, AS, and IS (P<.001). All S/SR parameters (GS, SRs, and SRe) were higher in 2C view than in 4C view (P<.001). All systolic S/SR parameters did not change with age. The early diastolic SR decreased, while the late diastolic SR increased with age. CONCLUSION: Our 12-segment RV strain model is feasible. Moreover, 2DSTE analysis using 2C and 4C views of the RV does not provide similar information. Rather, they offer complementary data. This might be of particularly clinical interest in diseases with regional RV dysfunction.

Comparison of pulse wave velocity assessed by three different techniques: Arteriograph, Complior, and Echo-tracking.

Arterial stiffness estimated by pulse wave velocity (PWV) is an independent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Although recommended by the current guidelines, clinical applicability of this parameter is difficult, due to differences between the various techniques used to measure it and to biological variability. Our aim was to compare PWV assessed by 3 different commercially available systems. 100 subjects (51 ± 16 years, 45 men) were evaluated using the 3 methods: an oscillometric technique (Arteriograph, PWV-A); a piezo-electric method (Complior, PWV-C); and an high-resolution ultrasound technique implemented with an Echo-tracking system (Aloka, PWV-E). Conventional biological markers were measured. Correlations of PWV measured by the 3 methods were poor (r = 0.39, r = 0.39, and r = 0.31 for PWV-A vs. PWV-C, PWV-A vs. PWV-E, and PWV-C vs. PWV-E, respectively, all p < 0.05). By Bland-Altman analysis, mean difference (±SD) of PWV-A vs. PWV-C was -1.9 ± 2.0 m/s, of PWV-A vs. PWV-E -3.6 ± 1.9 m/s, and of PWV-C vs. PWV-E -2.7 ± 1.9 m/s, with a wide coefficient of variation (22.3, 25.7, and 25.7 %, respectively). As expected, PWV-A, PWV-C, and PWV-E correlated with other arterial stiffness parameters, such as intima-media thickness (r = 0.22, r = 0.22, and r = 0.36, respectively), E p (r = 0.37, r = 0.26, and r = 0.94, respectively), and augmentation index measured by Arteriograph method (r = 0.66, r = 0.35, and r = 0.26, respectively); all p < 0.05. Assessment of PWV is markedly dependent on the technique used to measure it, related to various methods for measuring traveled distance of the arterial wave. Our results suggest the urgent need to establish reference values of PWV for each of these techniques, separately, to be used in routine clinical practice.