Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rofo ; 169(5): 484-9, 1998 Nov.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9849597

RESUMO

PURPOSE: A prospective study of the diagnostic accuracy and image quality of two MRI systems in the detection of renal tumors was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 34 patients with the clinical suspicion of a space-occupying renal lesion were examined by MRI with a low field (0.2 Tesla magnet) and a high field (1.5 Tesla magnet) for comparison. An "informed" and a "blind" observer evaluated all of the MR images. In addition, the signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were evaluated as second quality parameters. RESULTS: In 29 cases the results could be compared with a confirmed release diagnosis. Diagnostic accuracy was comparable with both systems (Sensitivity for both observer on LF apparatus: 83%, HF apparatus: 81%) although the signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were significantly poorer at low field. CONCLUSIONS: The low field system in comparable to the high field MRI for detection and differentiation of renal space-occupying lesions.


Assuntos
Doenças Renais Císticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico , Rim/patologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Erros de Diagnóstico , Reações Falso-Negativas , Reações Falso-Positivas , Gadolínio DTPA , Humanos , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...