[Treatment outcome in primary testicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma]. / Primer herelymphomás betegek kezelésével szerzett tapasztalatok.

INTRODUCTION: Primary testicular lymphoma constitutes a rare subgroup among extranodal non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Because of its aggressive clinical behaviour due to high grade histological features developing mainly in older population, patients with this disease usually have a poor prognosis. Orchidectomy followed by combination immunochemotherapy is a traditional treatment method with a rather inferior outcome. AIM: In this retrospective survey the authors analysed the clinical presentation, pathological features and treatment results of patients with primary testicular lymphoma diagnosed and treated in their haematology centre between 2000-2012 METHOD: During this period 334 patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas were treated, of whom 8 patients (2.39%; age between 23 and 86 years; median, 60 years) underwent semicastration for primary testicular lymphoma (7 patients had diffuse, large B-cell lymphoma and one patient had Burkitt-like lymphoma). According to the Ann Arbor staging system a limited stage I-IIE was diagnosed in 7 patients and advanced stage was found in one patient. All but one patients were treated with rituximab added to CHOP regimen (6 or 8 cycles in every 21 or 28 days), whereas one patient received radiotherapy only. Central nervous system intrathecal prophylaxis was used in one case and no preventive irradiation of the contralateral testis was used. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 50 months complete remission was observed in 7 patients. However, two patients died (one due to progression and one in remission from pulmonary solid tumour). Complete remission rate proved to be 87.5%, disease-free survival was between 13 and 152 months (median 38 months) and overall survival rates were between 17 and 156 months (median 43 months). The 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 37.5 %. CONCLUSIONS: The relatively favourable treatment outcome could be mainly explained by the high number of patients with early-stage of the disease, early surgical removal of testicular lymphomas and the use if immunochemotherapy. This therapeutic regimen was effective to prevent localized and distant relapses. Despite omission of regular prophylaxis of the central nervous system, no relapse was detected.

Clinical development of two innovative pharmaceutical forms of leuprorelin acetate.

OBJECTIVES: Two innovative pharmaceutical forms of leuprorelin acetate have been developed as 1-month and 3-month implants for the treatment of advanced hormone-dependent prostate cancer. These products contain active substance dispersed homogeneously in a biodegradable polymer. Here we present the key results from the clinical development of these slow-release implant formulations of leuprorelin. METHODS: Two therapeutic studies of the 1-month implant were performed: a randomized, controlled study comparing the leuprorelin implant with leuprorelin prolonged-release microspheres (Enantone) as the active control; and a single-arm study of the leuprorelin implant. For the 3-month implant, four therapeutic studies were performed: a randomized, controlled study comparing the leuprorelin implant with leuprorelin prolonged-release microspheres (Trenantone) as the active control; a single-arm study of the leuprorelin implant; and two long-term studies with the 3-month implant administered twice, either 12 or 16 weeks apart. A pooled analysis of data from the comparator-controlled and single-arm studies of the 3-month implant was also conducted. The main inclusion criterion for all studies was histologically confirmed advanced prostate cancer, with primary endpoints based around successful testosterone suppression (≤0.5 ng/ml). RESULTS: In the comparator-controlled studies, both implants were as effective as the microspheres for achieving successful testosterone suppression and normalization of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Data from the single-arm and long-term studies were consistent with those from the comparator-controlled studies. In the pooled analysis, significantly more patients treated with the 3-month implant achieved successful testosterone suppression compared with the comparator (p ≤ 0.01). The safety profile of the implants in the comparator-controlled studies was similar to that of the prolonged-release microsphere formulation, and consistent with that of the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist class. CONCLUSIONS: The innovative 1-month and 3-month implants of leuprorelin acetate are at least as effective as leuprorelin acetate prolonged-release microspheres for achieving successful testosterone suppression and normalization of PSA in men with advanced hormone-dependent prostate cancer, with a comparable safety profile.

[Our experience with nephron-sparing surgery in the past nine years]. / A szervmegtartó vesemutétekkel szerzett tapasztalataink az elmúlt kilenc évben.

UNLABELLED: Surgical therapy is the only curative therapeutic approach for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. Nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma, when performed by proper indication, provides recurrence-free and long-term survival rates similar to those observed after a radical surgical procedure. AIM: In this retrospective study we present our experiences on open nephron-sparing surgery. We describe the rates of different indications of nephron-sparing surgery, the rates of different hystopathological findings, the complications and the long-term cancer specific survival rates. METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively the data of 33 patients who had nephron-sparing surgery with T1 tumors between 1999 and 2008 in our department. The last patients' status evaluation was carried out in March 2009. The mean follow up was 4.64 years. RESULTS: 82% of the patients had an elective indication, 3% had relative and 15% had absolute indication for nephron-sparing surgery procedure. The mean tumor greatest dimension was 2.86cm. The hystopathologic review revealed 94% clear cell, 6% papillary renal cell carcinomas in the class of malignant renal tumors. The 1- and 5-year cancer-specific survival chance were 93.8%. We had to do nephrectomy because of postoperative bleeding and urinoma in 3 cases. CONCLUSION: Nephron-sparing surgery is an acceptable and safe treatment that provides excellent long-term cancer specific survival rates for T1a renal cell carcinoma patients.