The use of daily electronic prompts to help improve antimicrobial stewardship in a critical care unit.

INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a growing threat to public health, with the potential to reverse many of the gains made in modern medicine. AMR is contributed to by both inappropriate choice of antibiotics and inappropriate antibiotic course durations. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this audit was to determine if the introduction of antimicrobial prescribing electronic prompts in an electronic patient record had a positive impact on antimicrobial stewardship. METHODS: The audit examined the proportion of antibiotic prescriptions within a critical care unit in which both a valid stop date and indication were recorded. The audit was repeated on two occasions: first, after an education programme, and second, after the introduction of an electronic prompt within the patients' electronic patient record. RESULTS: Chi-square analyses indicated that significant improvements in both the recording of indications (χ²(4) = 39.69, P <0.0001) and stop-dates (χ²(4) = 42.10, P <0.0001) occurred across the three audits. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the novel use of daily electronic prompts has a positive impact on antimicrobial stewardship.

Myoclonus after cardiac arrest: pitfalls in diagnosis and prognosis.

Accurate prediction of neurological outcome in survivors of cardiac arrest may be difficult. We report the case of a 44-year-old survivor of a hypoxic cardiac arrest who repeatedly developed relentless myoclonic jerks on attempted discontinuation of his propofol infusion. These were initially thought to represent myoclonic status epilepticus before the correct diagnosis of Lance-Adams syndrome was made. Lance-Adams syndrome is a rare disorder seen in survivors of profound hypoxic episodes. It is characterised by intention myoclonus but preserved intellect. Accurate distinction between myoclonic status epilepticus and Lance-Adams syndrome is vital as they have very different prognoses. The different pathophysiology and distinguishing clinical features of these two conditions are highlighted.

The Diamedica Draw-Over Vaporizer: a comparison of a new vaporizer with the Oxford Miniature Vaporizer.

The Diamedica Draw-Over Vaporizer (DDV) has been developed as an alternative to the Oxford Miniature Vaporizer (OMV). Both can function as draw-over or plenum vaporizers. The performances of these two vaporizers were compared under conditions simulating intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) and continuous flow (CF). Series 1 experiments were conducted with the vaporizers in water baths at 20, 25 and 30 degrees C. Vaporizers were tested at dial settings of 1-4% over a range of minute volumes (1.75-6 l.min(-1)) and flow rates (3-8 l.min(-1)). Series 2 experiments compared output of the vaporizers over time at ambient temperatures of 20, 25 and 30 degrees C. A minute volume of 6 l.min(-1) (IPPV) and a gas flow of 8 l.min(-1) (CF) were used with a vaporizer setting of 2%. Vapour concentrations were recorded at 5-min intervals. In series 1 IPPV experiments, the DDV vaporizer was more accurate, producing significantly fewer vapour concentrations 0.5% more than or less than setting (p = 0.013). The OMV tended to produce more favourable results under continuous flow (p = 0.42). In series 2 experiments, the accuracy of both vaporizers was similar but consistency of output over time was better for the DDV and consistency of output according to differences in ambient temperature was better for the DDV. The OMV produced more vapour concentrations that were markedly higher than dial setting, particularly at high ambient temperatures. The DDV is a suitable alternative to the OMV with some distinct advantages. These include a larger reservoir, tendency towards greater accuracy during IPPV and improved consistency of output.