Effects of cardiologist experience on outcomes of patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction treated with primary PCI in a local area in Japan.

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) results in dramatically improved clinical outcomes when performed in a timely manner. Although guidelines for STEMI patients recommend PCI should be performed by experienced operators with acceptable PCI volume, cardiologists in a local area must perform primary PCI at their own hospitals. This study evaluated the effects of cardiologist experience on outcomes for STEMI patients in a local area in Japan.Between April 2007 and March 2010, 140 consecutive STEMI patients were admitted to our hospital and 121 of these patients received primary PCI. STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI were divided into two groups according to the operator's experience as a cardiologist. We retrospectively analyzed their clinical backgrounds, PCI findings, in-hospital outcomes, and drug administration at discharge.There were no significant differences in any clinical characteristics, angiographic findings, or PCI procedures between the two groups. Clinical outcomes of the two groups were similar, except for the length of hospital stay (21.1 ± 5.8 versus 15.5 ± 9.7; P = 0.0255). The frequency of administration of drugs such as ß-blockers (59.1% versus 34.0%; P = 0.0086), aldosterone blockade (10.4% versus 25.5%; P = 0.0334), and nicorandil (76.1% versus 25.5%; P = < 0.0001) was different between the two groups.The clinical outcomes of STEMI patients in this study were satisfactory and almost equivalent when compared according to the experience of the attending cardiologist. The present findings suggest the important clinical implication that younger cardiologists who have experienced PCI procedures to a certain extent can safely perform primary PCI and contribute to better prognoses of STEMI patients.

Clinical manifestations and effects of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with delayed pre-hospital time in acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged pre-hospital time for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with decreased indication for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the efficacy of primary PCI in AMI patients with prolonged pre-hospital time has not been fully investigated in Japan. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 3010 consecutive AMI patients admitted to AMI-Kyoto Multi-Center Risk Study Group hospitals were retrospectively analyzed, and the clinical characteristics and in-hospital prognosis of these patients were reviewed. Patients with pre-hospital delay [elapsed time (ET)>12 h] had a lower frequency of Killip≥3 (9.3%) and less frequently received primary PCI (77.7%) compared with patients with ET≤12 h. In the ET>12 h group, older patients or patients with MI history tended to be complicated by heart failure. Primary PCI was performed for patients with ET>12 h, irrespective of the severity of heart failure [Killip 1 (78.7%) vs Killip≥2 (74.0%); p=0.3827]. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, age [odds ratio (OR) 1.053], MI history (OR 2.860), Killip≥2 (OR 10.235), and multi-vessels or left main coronary artery as culprit (OR 11.712) were significant independent positive predictors of in-hospital mortality for patients with ET>12 h. Practice of primary PCI was not a significant negative predictor for patients with ET>12 h (OR 0.812), but it was for patients with ET≤12 h (OR 0.425). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that patients with ET>12 h have a less severe condition and less frequently receive primary PCI compared with patients with ET≤12 h. Although primary PCI is often performed for these patients irrespective of the severity of heart failure, no preferable effect of primary PCI on the in-hospital mortality is demonstrated. In contrary, practice of primary PCI is a significant negative predictor of in-hospital mortality for patients with ET≤12 h.

Effective surgical treatment for controlling the acute heart failure induced by acutely progressed mitral regurgitation with nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis.

A 45-year-old woman complaining of consciousness disturbance demonstrated multiple brain infarctions. Echocardiogram showed vegetation on the posterior mitral leaflet. Infectious endocarditis was initially suspected and we started empirical antibiotics. However, mitral vegetation grew rapidly and caused severe mitral regurgitation. Acute heart failure was so poorly controlled by conservative treatment that we concluded cardiac surgery was indicated. Mitral valve replacement was safely performed, and there was no sign of heart failure or recurrent thromboembolism during the postoperative course. Thereafter, multiple hepatic masses and a solid lesion in the pancreatic head were detected by computed tomography. The patient finally died of multiple organ failure that presumably resulted from malignancy in the terminal stage. The clinical course of this case can be explained by the pathology of nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE). The standard treatment for NBTE consists of systemic anticoagulation as well as controlling the underlying malignancy. However, we could not diagnose this case as NBTE before surgery. Although mitral valve replacement was finally effective to control acute heart failure in this case, NBTE should be exactly diagnosed as quickly as possible and the treatment policy should be deliberated.