Total Knee Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Joint Infection with Concomitant Extensor Mechanism Disruption and Soft-Tissue Defect: The Knee Arthroplasty Terrible Triad.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic infection (PJI) with concomitant extensor mechanism disruption (EMD) and soft-tissue defect - hereinafter termed the "Terrible Triad" - is a devastating complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to define the surgical and clinical outcomes following management of a cohort of patients who have the Terrible Triad. METHODS: From 2000 to 2022, 127 patients underwent operative management for PJI alone, 25 for PJI with soft-tissue defects (defined as defects requiring flap reconstruction or being a factor contributing to the decision of performing above-knee amputation (AKA) or arthrodesis), 14 for PJI with EMD, and 22 for the Terrible Triad. A composite outcome of infection status, range of motion, extensor lag, and ambulatory status at final follow-up was used to compare the proportion of patients in each group with a favorable overall knee outcome. Differences between groups were determined using one-way analyses of variance with post hoc Tukey's tests and Pearson's Chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests with post hoc Bonferroni adjustments, where applicable. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for comparison of the overall knee outcome between groups. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for patient mortality was performed. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 8.4 years and similar between groups (P = 0.064). Patients who had the Terrible Triad had a 45.5% incidence of AKA, or arthrodesis, and an 86.4% incidence of an unfavorable outcome. Compared to patients in the PJI group, patients in the PJI who had a soft-tissue defect (OR=5.8, 95%CI [confidence interval] 2.2 to 15.7), PJI with EMD (OR=3.7, 95%CI 1.0 to 12.9), and Terrible Triad groups (OR=11.6, 95%CI 3.3 to 41.5) showed higher odds of an unfavorable knee outcome. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the TKA Terrible Triad is a dreaded diagnosis with poor outcomes. Clinicians and patients might consider early treatment with amputation or arthrodesis.

Effectiveness of preoperative thoracic epidural testing strategies: a retrospective comparison of three commonly used testing methods.

PURPOSE: Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is a well stablished technique for pain management in major thoracic and abdominal surgeries; however, it has considerable failure rates. Local anesthetic (LA) administration and subsequent assessment of sensory block through physical examination (e.g., decreased temperature perception determined via an LA temperature dissociation test [LATDT]) has been the historical standard for evaluation of thoracic epidural placement. Nevertheless, newer methods to objectively evaluate successful placement have recently been developed, e.g., the epidural electrical stimulation test (EEST) and epidural pressure waveform analysis (EWA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative TEA catheter testing (LATDT, EEST, and EWA) on reducing TEA failure. METHODS: After obtaining an institutional research ethics board approval for a retrospective study, we conducted a single-institution retrospective review on all TEAs performed between January 2016 and December 2021. Patients were assigned to one of four groups based on the performed test method to verify the placement of the TEA catheter: no test, LATDT, EEST, and EWA. A TEA was deemed successful if it provided bilateral dermatomal sensory block to ice test in the postoperative period, and was used for patient analgesia for at least 24 hr. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred and forty-one patients submitted to preoperative TEA were included. Twenty-eight patients were excluded. Tested and untested epidurals had failure rates of 3.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8 to 6.2) and 11.5% (95% CI, 5.2 to 17.1), respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Objective preoperative testing after placement of thoracic epidurals was associated with a reduction in failure rates.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'analgésie péridurale thoracique (APT) est une technique bien établie pour la prise en charge de la douleur dans les chirurgies thoraciques et abdominales majeures; cette modalité entraîne cependant des taux d'échec considérables. L'administration d'anesthésique local (AL) et l'évaluation subséquente du bloc sensitif par un examen physique (p. ex. diminution de la perception de la température déterminée par un test de dissociation de la température après l'AL [LATDT]) ont constitué la norme historique pour l'évaluation du positionnement de la péridurale thoracique. Néanmoins, de nouvelles méthodes permettant d'évaluer objectivement le positionnement réussi ont récemment été mises au point, par exemple le test de stimulation électrique péridurale (EEST) et l'analyse de la forme d'onde de pression péridurale (EWA). L'objectif de cette étude était d'évaluer l'efficacité des tests préopératoires de cathéters d'APT (LATDT, EEST et EWA) sur la réduction des échecs d'APT. MéTHODE: Après avoir obtenu l'approbation d'un comité d'éthique de la recherche de l'établissement pour une étude rétrospective, nous avons réalisé un examen rétrospectif monocentrique de toutes les APT réalisées entre janvier 2016 et décembre 2021. Les patient·es ont été assigné·es à l'un des quatre groupes en fonction de la méthode de test utilisée pour vérifier l'emplacement du cathéter d'APT, soit : aucun test, LATDT, EEST et EWA. Une APT a été jugée efficace si elle a fourni un bloc sensitif dermatomal bilatéral au test de glace en postopératoire et a été utilisée pour l'analgésie pendant au moins 24 heures. RéSULTATS: Mille deux cent quarante et un·e patient·es soumis·es à une APT préopératoire ont été inclus·es. Vingt-huit personnes ont été exclues. Les péridurales testées et non testées présentaient des taux d'échec de 3,8 % (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 1,8 à 6,2) et de 11,5 % (IC 95 %, 5,2 à 17,1), respectivement (P < 0,001). CONCLUSION: Les tests préopératoires objectifs après la mise en place de péridurales thoraciques ont été associés à une réduction des taux d'échec.

Improving Resource Utilization for Arthroplasty Care by Leveraging Machine Learning and Optimization: A Systematic Review.

Background: There is a growing demand for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) surgery. The applications of machine learning (ML), mathematical optimization, and computer simulation have the potential to improve efficiency of TJA care delivery through outcome prediction and surgical scheduling optimization, easing the burden on health-care systems. The purpose of this study was to evaluate strategies using advances in analytics and computational modeling that may improve planning and the overall efficiency of TJA care. Methods: A systematic review including MEDLINE, Embase, and IEEE Xplore databases was completed from inception to October 3, 2022, for identification of studies generating ML models for TJA length of stay, duration of surgery, and hospital readmission prediction. A scoping review of optimization strategies in elective surgical scheduling was also conducted. Results: Twenty studies were included for evaluating ML predictions and 17 in the scoping review of scheduling optimization. Among studies generating linear or logistic control models alongside ML models, only 1 found a control model to outperform its ML counterpart. Furthermore, neural networks performed superior to or at the same level as conventional ML models in all but 1 study. Implementation of mathematical and simulation strategies improved the optimization efficiency when compared to traditional scheduling methods at the operational level. Conclusions: High-performing predictive ML-based models have been developed for TJA, as have mathematical strategies for elective surgical scheduling optimization. By leveraging artificial intelligence for outcome prediction and surgical optimization, there exist greater opportunities for improved resource utilization and cost-savings in TJA than when using traditional modeling and scheduling methods.

Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in 2-Stage Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) has long been used in 2-stage revision surgeries of the hip, for both aseptic and septic indications. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize the cumulative occurrence rates of the clinical and functional outcomes associated with the use of ETO in 2-stage revision total hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases were searched for articles published from January 1980 to January 2022 using the following keywords: "extended" AND "trochanteric" AND "osteotomy" AND "infection." Cumulative occurrence rates of outcomes and complications were calculated. A fixed-effects model and a 95% CI were applied. A P value of .05 was considered the significance threshold. RESULTS: Nine studies were in full compliance with the inclusion criteria, with a total population size across all studies of 378. Union and infection eradication rates among studies were 95.1% (95% CI, 92.7-97.1, P = .018) and 94.0% (95% CI, 91.1-96.4, P = .089), respectively. Postoperation complications occurred in 15.34% of patients (95% CI, 10.34-21.22, P = .066). Occurrence rates for stem subsidence, dislocation, and femoral fractures were 6.2% (95% CI, 3.3-9.9, P = .187), 7.6% (95% CI, 4.8-10.9, P = .075), and 9.1% (95% CI, 5.8-13, P = .106), respectively. CONCLUSION: With high rates of union and infection eradication, and low rates of postoperation complications, this study concludes the use of ETO in performing 2-stage revision total hip arthroplasty for the septic hip to be effective and safe.

The Impact of Peripheral Nerve Block on the Quality of Care After Ankle Fracture Surgery: A Quality Improvement Study.

OBJECTIVES: To increase peripheral nerve block (PNB) administration for ankle fracture surgeries (AFSs) at our institution to above 50% by January 1st, 2021. DESIGN: Longitudinal, single-center quality improvement study conducted at a high-volume tertiary care center. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing isolated AFS for unimalleolar, bimalleolar, or trimalleolar ankle fracture from July 2017 to April 2021 were included in this study. INTERVENTION: Interventions implemented to minimize barriers for PNB administration included recruitment and training of expert anesthesiologists in regional anesthesia, procurement of ultrasound machines, implementation of a dedicated block room, and creation of a pamphlet for patients describing multimodal analgesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: The primary outcome was the percentage of patients receiving PNB for AFS. Secondary outcomes included hospital length-of-stay, postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption (mean oral morphine equivalent [OME]), proportion of patients not requiring opioid analgesic in PACU, and PACU and 24-hour postoperative nausea/vomiting requiring antiemetic. RESULTS: The PNB and non-PNB groups included 78 and 157 patients, respectively. PNB administration increased from <5% to 53% after implementation of the improvement bundle. Mean PACU and 24-hour opioid analgesic consumption was lower in the PNB group (PACU OME 38.96 mg vs. 55.42 mg, P = 0.001; 24-hour OME 50.83 mg vs. 65.69 mg, P = 0.008). A greater proportion of patients in the PNB group did not require PACU opioids (62.8% vs. 27.4%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: By performing a root cause analysis and implementing a multidisciplinary, patient-centered improvement bundle, we increased PNB administration for AFSs, resulting in reduced postoperative opioid analgesia consumption. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.