A review of currently available vessel sealing systems.

Laparoscopic surgery is rapidly expanding among urologists as a minimally invasive treatment with surgical procedures becoming increasingly challenging. Accurate haemostatis is of utmost importance in laparoscopy, as bleeding can rapidly impair the working environment conditions. We subsequently reviewed the different haemostatic tools used in laparoscopy with the focus on ultrasonic dissectors and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (EBVS). Briefly, there is a wide variety of haemostatic tools currently available in laparoscopy, all with their inherent advantages and limitations. The comparison of ultrasonic dissectors and EBVS shows that both systems are very attractive with similar physical properties concerning thermal spread and bursting pressure of vessels sealed. It has to be noted, however, that EBVS can handle vessels of up to 7 mm. In conclusion, haemostatic tools constitute a rapidly evolving domain with devices being developed which cause less thermal spread, while being more precise and faster. This evolution should finally allow more complex laparoscopic surgical procedures.

The importance of measuring the prostatic transition zone: an anatomical and radiological study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy and reliability of measurements of the volume of the transition zone (TZ, representing the hypertrophied benign component) and whole prostate by TRUS in patients with BPH or cancer, by comparing the radiological with pathological findings after surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study comprised 36 patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy and 34 patients with symptomatic BPH treated using retropubic adenectomy. The weights of the radical prostatectomy specimens and of the enucleated adenomas were correlated with the corresponding volumes of the TZ and of the whole prostate, respectively, measured by TRUS using the prolate ellipsoid method. RESULTS: The mean (sd) TZ volume measured by TRUS was 36.9 (25.48) mL, whereas the weight of the enucleated specimen was 42.7 (33.58) g (correlation coefficient r=0.95, P<0.001). The TRUS estimate of the volume of the whole prostate was 29.2 (9.24) mL, while the radical prostatectomy specimens weighed 34.5 (10.76) g (r=0.78, P<0.001). The variability in the TZ volume estimate ranged from -17% to +18%, whereas the variability for whole prostate was -21% to +30% (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of the TZ of the prostate by TRUS are more accurate than those for the whole prostate. An assessment of the TZ volume may be sufficiently reliable to be used in the clinical management of BPH and to detect prostate cancer using the prostate-specific antigen density of the TZ as a marker.