RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of women who underwent abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) by urologist and gynecologist. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 61 women underwent transabdominal sacrocolpopexy, with 31 by a urologist (Group 1) and 30 by a gynecologist (Group 2). The patients were presented with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The results were evaluated with Baden-Walker system and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF) to assess anatomical and continence outcomes. Postoperative complications were documented based on the Dindo and Clavien Classification. Statistical analyses were done using Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test with SPSS version 21.0. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 21.4 (12-36) and 21.8 (12-36) months for Group 1 and Group 2, respectively (p = 0.72). The mean estimated blood loss and length of hospitalization were similar in both groups. The success rates were; 93.5% for Group 1 and 93.3% for Group 2 (p = 0.89). There was no difference in complication rates between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The fact that it was administered by gynocologist or urologist does not affect the outcomes of sacrocolpopexy surgery. Similar success and complication rates were found in the patients for both groups.
