The effect of excessive alcohol consumption on the heart function and working capacity of manual workers.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of prolonged daily excessive alcohol consumption on the heart function with particular reference to the impact on the working ability of alcoholics. The study was carried out on 54 male manual workers, 32 of whom had a median age of 40.5 years with a history of heavy alcohol consumption of more than 100 g a day over a period of 10 years or more. The study also covered 22 non-alcoholics with a median age of 38.5 years from the same work environment. The study covered laboratory tests (MCV, AST, ALT, GGT), a maximal exercise test, as well as echocardiography. CONCLUSION: In spite of the observed differences, the functional ability in the chronic alcoholics in this study has not yet been disrupted as far as the cardiovascular system is concerned. During the maximal exercise test alcoholics achieved on the average 10.8 METS the same as the non-alcoholics, which shows that they are still capable of performing strenuous manual work. The question which remains to be answered is whether, in view of the already observed accelerated heart rate, higher blood pressure at rest and the echocardiographic changes, the patients would develop a manifest heart disease if they were to continue to drink heavily for a period more than 10 years.

Hyperdynamic beta-adrenergic syndrome among Croatian soldiers engaged in battle.

A group of 1592 male Croatian soldiers (average age 32 +/- 9, ranging from 19 to 54) were examined by an internist at the war hospital. Elevated blood pressure was found in 80 men (5%); 61 of them had no history of hypertension (Group A), while in 19 patients hypertensive disease had been diagnosed before (Group B). In group A, systolic blood pressure (BPS in mm Hg), diastolic blood pressure (BPD in mm Hg) and heart rate (HR) were 182 +/- 13, 111 +/- 10, and 115 +/- 9; in group B, the values were 184 +/- 12, 108 +/- 8, 85 +/- 11. Electrocardiograms (ECG) and thorax roentgenograms of group A did not reveal any hypertension-caused signs, neither did the examination of the fundus, nor the serum creatinine values yield any abnormal results. The ECG test showed sinus tachycardia (heart rate > 100/min) but an otherwise normal function in group A. In group B, at least one of the laboratory examinations confirmed the previously diagnosed hypertension. Group A was treated with the cardioselective beta-blocker Atenolol (100 mg daily), while in group B, the previous antihypertensive medication was modified and/or increased. All patients were sent back to the front-line. Three days later, blood pressure and heart rate in group A were: BPS 139 +/- 9, BPD 87 +/- 6 and HR 77 +/- 8; and in group B: 156 +/- 11, 95 +/- 8, 75 +/- 7. A significant decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (p < 0.0001) was found in both groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)