Analysis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia diagnostic and management strategies in individuals with inconclusive antibody optical densities.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an uncommon but serious complication of exposure to heparin. Antibody optical densities (ODs) used to diagnose HIT exceeding 2 are highly suggestive of disease, whereas ODs less than 0.5 often 'rule out' HIT. Variation in the clinical care of patients with inconclusive ODs between 0.5 and 2 is likely. This single-centre, retrospective analysis evaluates the diagnosis, management and outcomes of those with antibody ODs between 0.5 and 2. We queried our institution's Healthcare Enterprise Repository for Ontological Narration (HERON) database to identify individuals with antibody ODs between 0.5 and 2. Chart review was completed to calculate 4T scores, corroborate diagnosis codes with documented information in our electronic health record (EHR) and evaluate the diagnosis, management and outcomes of these individuals. These data were evaluated using descriptive and univariate statistics. Among individuals evaluated for HIT between November 2007 and July 2020, we identified 302 individuals with ODs between 0.5 and 2. Serotonin release assays (SRAs) were assessed in 55% (165/302) and were positive in 12% (20/165). In those with available data, 96% with low 4T scores had negative SRAs and 4% had positive SRAs. As 4T scores and antibody ODs proportionally increased, SRA positivity also increased. Clinical management varied widely; however, 4T scoring remains a valuable assessment in this cohort. In those with HIT antibody ODs between 0.5 and 2, true positives were uncommon, and their clinical management varied widely. Fortunately, 4T scoring is a useful prognostic tool that improves the diagnosis and management among those with inconclusive HIT.

Evaluation of the Potential Impact of a Multiplex Rapid Diagnostic Panel in Critically Ill Patients With Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia.

Background Rapid diagnostic tools have emerged as valuable assets assisting clinicians in decision-making regarding patient management in the hospital setting. Our study sought to identify the potential impact of the BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel (FP Panel) (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA) in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). Methods Respiratory samples obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) or tracheal aspiration (TA) from ICU patients with a diagnosis of HAP were tested by the FP panel in addition to routine bacterial cultures. In addition, the electronic health records of these patients were reviewed to determine what potential changes in antimicrobial therapy could have been implemented if the panel results were known to the treatment team in real-time. A cost analysis was also performed incorporating the cost of the pneumonia panel and the savings associated with the potential decrease of antibiotic use and avoidance of the rapid viral diagnostic panel.  Results Fifty-six patients met the study criteria. The FP panel results could have prompted a change in therapy in 36 (64.3%) patients, with an anticipated mean reduction in time to optimized therapy of approximately 51 hours. In addition, the panel identified three cases where antimicrobials should have been altered because patients were not receiving empiric therapy with activity against the causative pathogen and 34 opportunities for antibiotic de-escalation. The cost analysis calculated an additional cost of $10 per patient associated with using the FP panel.  Conclusions The FP panel could have prompted a change in therapy in about two-thirds of patients studied. Its potential benefits include a more rapid time to optimized therapy, reduced exposure to and cost of broad-spectrum antimicrobials, and reduced cost of other rapid diagnostic tests.